Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
Old 4th July 2006, 06:55 PM
Thetargos Offline
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Age: 39
Posts: 4,430
Wine 0.9.16 slower than previous ones?

For some games at least. I had not installed Wine 0.9.16 until it was available through Extras.

For some time now, me and some friends have at least three times a week a Diablo II session (in TCP/IP mode), and for some time now I could stop using Cedega for Diablo (which is a pain to get working properly in FC5, by the way) in favor of Wine, which with latest installments supported the drives mounted via gnome-mount just fine (a God's send!). Anyway, so I upgraded recently to the latest version of Wine, but I DO notice that at least in Diablo, performance has suffer quite a bit. I will have to test other applications such as Starcraft, Warcraft II and maybe even Warcraft III (which at least up to 0.9.15 was much faster than Cedega [using -opengl] on my system). I'm more concerned about older games as for newer I've got Cedega installed (and to speak the truth I'd rather use Wine than Cedega).

What I have noticed thus far:
  • Diablo II now seems to be more sensible at having the minimap opened than with previous releases of Wine. If the minimap is set to fade any areas or everything, the performance hit is bigger.
  • Sensitive to the amount of action on the screen. Up to 0.9.15-FC release I never noticed any peformance decrement when there was a lot of action on the screen.
  • Certain areas make the game run choppy. For instance behind the castle in Lut Golein, when you are using 3D acceleration.
  • Corrupted visuals if you are using AA/AF filters with your drivers (nVidia) in the form of "tiles" and "ghost trails" in the game, needless to mention this did not happen with 0.9.15
  • Audio seems to skip quite a bit.

I'm not complaining about these issues, I'm just trying to stablish if anybody else has encountered these issues with Wine 0.9.16 and other games (like in my case Diablo II).

As far as I can tell, Starcraft works pretty much the same... Since it had bee a while since I last played this game, I'm not 100% sure when the performance was compromised, but even in 0.9.15 there seemed to be some problems when a lot of sprites were on the screen, and there was a lot of action, however, to later be renedered at normal speed... Odd...

Anyway, apparently Starcraft behaves pretty much the same as with 0.9.15.
If ain't broken, don't fix it! :eek:
If can be improved, go for it! :cool:

FedoraForum Community forums lurker.
Fedora user since RHL 5.2 :cool:
Reply With Quote

previous, slower, wine

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
my computer is getting slower and slower... help! Wiles Using Fedora 6 9th May 2007 07:45 PM
CPU MHz Slower than it should be? leaded Using Fedora 27 24th August 2006 07:59 PM
Is FC4 far slower than FC3 for anyone? ggulik EOL (End Of Life) Versions 24 27th June 2005 02:23 AM
FC4 Seems Slower Than FC3 bkedelen Using Fedora 0 17th June 2005 11:45 PM

Current GMT-time: 03:46 (Saturday, 19-08-2017)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat