Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 31st July 2013, 11:24 PM
bob's Avatar
bob Offline
Administrator (yeah, back again)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colton, NY; Junction of Heaven & Earth (also Routes 56 & 68).
Age: 72
Posts: 23,296
linuxfirefox
F17 Reaches EOL

As of 30th July 2013, Fedora 17 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 17. A previous reminder was sent on July 3rd [0]. Fedora 18 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 20. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [1]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [2] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Cheers, Dennis Gilmore
__________________
Linux & Beer - That TOTALLY Computes!
Registered Linux User #362651


Don't use any of my solutions on working computers or near small children.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st August 2013, 03:35 PM
solo2101's Avatar
solo2101 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: behind that screen...
Posts: 918
linuxfirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

well... there goes another good version...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd August 2013, 03:24 PM
jonnycat's Avatar
jonnycat Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 322
linuxfirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by solo2101 View Post
well... there goes another good version...
Aye, 17 has been very good to me, and I really don't want to fight with the Anaconda mess to get another Fedora version.

RIP F17.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th August 2013, 06:21 AM
Reisswolf's Avatar
Reisswolf Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 337
linuxubuntufirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

Methinks this has surely been discussed somewhere, but given that most "serious" pieces of software--please don't ask me to define what that means--can take 18 months or more to conceive and bring to production, how do other people here handle software development on Fedora? Do you simply update to the latest version and hope that everything will work? Or do you use a different distribution, perhaps a long-term one with a penchant for alliterative names?
__________________
Registered user # 441814
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th August 2013, 12:41 PM
CronoCloud's Avatar
CronoCloud Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midwest USA
Age: 50
Posts: 514
linuxfirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reisswolf View Post
Or do you use a different distribution, perhaps a long-term one with a penchant for alliterative names?
Well, there's always RHEL and CentOS.

CronoCloud
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6th August 2013, 08:11 PM
Reisswolf's Avatar
Reisswolf Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 337
linuxubuntufirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

Both excellent distributions, and would have been my primary choices but for the fact that their repositories don't always have the latest versions of the packages. And I am someone who prefers to install packages (almost) exclusively through the package manager and keep manual installations down to a minimum. (Opera is the only exception I can point to.)

CentOS and Red Hat are still using 2.x kernels. It says clearly on Red Hat's page that kernel upgrades should only be done through yum. But the repositories don't have the latest kernels. (I would have thought that Debian's use of kernel 3.2 would be suuficient to establish the stability and viability of the newer kernels.)

Another problem is that the repositories don't have version 4 of OCaml, my primary language on Linux (along with C). There have been a few upgrades to the language from version 3.12; these are not present in the repositories.

Otherwise, I would have almost certainly used CentOS.

But until then, Fedora and Ubuntu will have to suffice.
__________________
Registered user # 441814
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 6th August 2013, 11:35 PM
jonnycat's Avatar
jonnycat Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 322
linuxfirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reisswolf View Post
Both excellent distributions, and would have been my primary choices but for the fact that their repositories don't always have the latest versions of the packages. And I am someone who prefers to install packages (almost) exclusively through the package manager and keep manual installations down to a minimum.
That is exactly why I originally chose Fedora, and why I am reluctant to change.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 6th August 2013, 11:38 PM
jpollard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
Posts: 7,346
linuxfirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reisswolf View Post
Both excellent distributions, and would have been my primary choices but for the fact that their repositories don't always have the latest versions of the packages. And I am someone who prefers to install packages (almost) exclusively through the package manager and keep manual installations down to a minimum. (Opera is the only exception I can point to.)

CentOS and Red Hat are still using 2.x kernels. It says clearly on Red Hat's page that kernel upgrades should only be done through yum. But the repositories don't have the latest kernels. (I would have thought that Debian's use of kernel 3.2 would be suuficient to establish the stability and viability of the newer kernels.)

Another problem is that the repositories don't have version 4 of OCaml, my primary language on Linux (along with C). There have been a few upgrades to the language from version 3.12; these are not present in the repositories.

Otherwise, I would have almost certainly used CentOS.

But until then, Fedora and Ubuntu will have to suffice.
Not just that... the latest kernels have changes that make the older versions of KVM/VMware/Xen user space tools fail.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 7th August 2013, 05:51 PM
Gareth Jones Offline
Retired Adminstrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Birmingham, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 2,761
linuxfirefox
Re: F17 Reaches EOL

There’s also Rawhide, if you’re doing software development and want to ensure that your code works with the latest releases.

Ultimately, if you’re doing Linux development and want to target more than one distribution (or version), you (or at least your team) will need to be prepared to work with multiple installations anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F17 To Reach EOL 7/30 - Dennis Gilmore bob News 0 3rd July 2013 07:43 PM
F16 eol, f17->f18 yaxattax Installation, Upgrades and Live Media 7 17th January 2013 07:42 PM
Unvanquished Reaches Alpha 9 mmix Gamers' Lounge 0 14th November 2012 12:36 PM
Songbird reaches version 1.0.0 status Wayne Using Fedora 18 9th January 2009 02:51 PM


Current GMT-time: 09:48 (Sunday, 22-10-2017)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat