Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #676  
Old 6th October 2011, 05:05 PM
Dangermouse's Avatar
Dangermouse Offline
Administrator - (On Leave)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London Postbox (the red one)
Age: 52
Posts: 3,868
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: [Obsolete] flash-plugin-11.0.1.129-1.x86_64.rpm

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBelton View Post
Yep! I tried the extra themes, and they do work.

However, I think some of them may be in the standard fedora repos now. Here are the ones in the fedora repo for F16...

Code:
gnome-shell-theme-Elementary.noarch : The Elementary gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-NeoGeniX.noarch : The neogenix gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-SLAVE.noarch : The Slave gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-atolm.noarch : The Atolm gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-dark-glass.noarch : The Dark-Glass gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-gaia.noarch : The Gaia gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-orta.noarch : The Orta gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset.noarch : The Smooth-Inset gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-smooth-inset-small-screen.noarch : The
     ...: smooth-inset-small-screen gnome-shell theme
gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy.noarch : The Tron gnome-shell theme


---------- Post added at 10:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 AM ----------



sure did. Wonder how it got your name in there?? I'll fix it though.
Looks like they have put all bar one of them in f16, not sure why they missed out the one, maybe
it will be in soon or they didnt like it
Reply With Quote
  #677  
Old 6th October 2011, 05:16 PM
DBelton's Avatar
DBelton Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,463
linuxfirefox
Re: [Obsolete] flash-plugin-11.0.1.129-1.x86_64.rpm

Yep. all but one explains why I have 11 themes (besides the default) and there are 10 in the repo. I had to try them all out because I think the default theme is butt ugly.

Now I just have to find themes to get rid of the butt ugly GDM login screen. I thought the older one looked better than the new theme. Those plain black boxes just don't do much for me.
Reply With Quote
  #678  
Old 6th October 2011, 06:29 PM
Dangermouse's Avatar
Dangermouse Offline
Administrator - (On Leave)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London Postbox (the red one)
Age: 52
Posts: 3,868
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: [Obsolete] flash-plugin-11.0.1.129-1.x86_64.rpm

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBelton View Post
Yep. all but one explains why I have 11 themes (besides the default) and there are 10 in the repo. I had to try them all out because I think the default theme is butt ugly.

Now I just have to find themes to get rid of the butt ugly GDM login screen. I thought the older one looked better than the new theme. Those plain black boxes just don't do much for me.
Havent tried yet but i think what ever the default system theme is, it will be in the gdm, plus
you can change the background
http://www.dnmouse.org/autoten/gnome...ackground.html
I will package some more themes once i get on to f16, hopefully they will end up in the repos as well.



Lock Thread ??????????
Reply With Quote
  #679  
Old 27th October 2011, 03:17 AM
tox
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
windows_7firefox
Re: [Obsolete] flash-plugin-11.0.1.129-1.x86_64.rpm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangermouse View Post
Havent tried yet but i think what ever the default system theme is, it will be in the gdm, plus
you can change the background
http://www.dnmouse.org/autoten/gnome...ackground.html
I will package some more themes once i get on to f16, hopefully they will end up in the repos as well.



Lock Thread ??????????
are you taking over the 64builds Dave and packaging them in AutoPlus?
Reply With Quote
  #680  
Old 4th February 2015, 05:54 AM
clariceoshea Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 290
linuxfirefox
Re: [Obsolete] flash-plugin-11.0.1.129-1.x86_64.rpm

Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================== ================================================== ================================================== =====================================
Removing:
nspluginwrapper x86_64 1.4.4-21.fc21 installed 510 k

Transaction Summary
================================================== ================================================== ================================================== =====================================
Remove 1 Package

Installed size: 510 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading packages:
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction (shutdown inhibited)
Erasing : nspluginwrapper-1.4.4-21.fc21.x86_64 1/1
Verifying : nspluginwrapper-1.4.4-21.fc21.x86_64 1/1

Removed:
nspluginwrapper.x86_64 0:1.4.4-21.fc21

Complete!
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -Uvh http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecal...1-2.noarch.rpm
Retrieving http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecal...1-2.noarch.rpm
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
error: skipping http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecal...1-2.noarch.rpm - transfer failed
[root@localhost ~]#
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flashpluginx8664rpm , obsolete

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New x86_64 adobe flash plugin (alpha) G3R Using Fedora 53 10th November 2011 02:12 AM
flash-player plugin for x86_64? legumes Using Fedora 4 21st September 2011 11:24 PM
F11 x86_64, Firefox 3.5, flash-plugin i386, mozilla-plugin-config bongoman Using Fedora 21 30th July 2009 02:58 AM
Opera and Flash-Plugin on Fedora x86_64 Keldorn Using Fedora 0 6th July 2008 05:40 PM
Woohooo Flash + Plugin For X86_64 In A While !!! Knudson Using Fedora 1 16th January 2006 11:32 AM


Current GMT-time: 22:33 (Monday, 23-10-2017)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat