Test your browser with this page. Here is the reference. The closest the browser properly render this smiley, the closest it is for W3C standard. So far, among the browser I used (Opera, Konqueror and Firefox), Firefox is the best.
Results 1 to 15 of 26
-
17th April 2005, 09:41 PM #1
Community Manager
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada
- Posts
- 2,653
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Test your favorite browser
Desktop CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - Memory: 32GB DDR4-RAM - GPU: Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 560 4GB OC Storage: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500 GB NVMe and Seagate 7200 RPM 2TB - OS: Fedora 36 Design Suite x86-64 and Windows 11 64-bit
Laptop HP ENVY x360 15- APU: AMD Ryzen 2500U - Memory: 16GB DDR4-RAM - Storage: Samsung 970 Evo Plus 1TB NVMe + Samsung 860 Evo 1TB SSD - OS: Fedora 36 Design Suite x86-64
-
18th April 2005, 12:43 AM #2veritas Guest
I went there with Firefox and it was TERRIBLE. It was a mutant smiley from OUTER SPACE. Not even recognizable. What does that say about my Firefox browser. I usually don't have many issues with it, but it does make me wonder.
-
18th April 2005, 01:00 AM #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Bristol, UK
- Posts
- 471
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Yeah I also got a load of junk with firefox.
Although I was in Windows at the time - perhaps its caught some nasty IE bug?
Looking at the page in IE - half the page was a giant red block with a bit of yellow in it and the word ERROR. :|
Out of intrest what exactly does this test prove anyway?
Dave
-
18th April 2005, 01:18 AM #4
Community Manager
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada
- Posts
- 2,653
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
This test is about W3C standard compliance. Here is more info
Desktop CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - Memory: 32GB DDR4-RAM - GPU: Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 560 4GB OC Storage: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500 GB NVMe and Seagate 7200 RPM 2TB - OS: Fedora 36 Design Suite x86-64 and Windows 11 64-bit
Laptop HP ENVY x360 15- APU: AMD Ryzen 2500U - Memory: 16GB DDR4-RAM - Storage: Samsung 970 Evo Plus 1TB NVMe + Samsung 860 Evo 1TB SSD - OS: Fedora 36 Design Suite x86-64
-
18th April 2005, 01:25 AM #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- ark n saw out in the sticks
- Posts
- 2,316
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
FC3 with Firefox messed up considerable on the acidtest
FC3 running Dillo was a total disaster for compliance.
guess my browsers are setup not to allow just anything---just as I want them to do.
-
18th April 2005, 07:16 AM #6imdeemvp Guest
ok.........
-
27th June 2005, 05:53 PM #7johny Guest
heh, well... firefox's thing is nothing compared to konqueror's
-
27th June 2005, 06:33 PM #8tejas Guest
That is exactly what I got
From FF in FC4
I'm about to cry. What can be done to improve FF?
Are you sure this isn't for IE compliance?
-
27th June 2005, 06:40 PM #9ieuuk Guestits definatly not for ie... mine comes out pants
Originally Posted by tejas
-
27th June 2005, 07:06 PM #10
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Netherlands
- Age
- 35
- Posts
- 1,426
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
It's to test css2 compliance... (so certainly NOT for M$IE) Originally Posted by tejas
Anyway, safari was the first do pass the test, but they haven't released it yet. Konqueror (khtml) developers are heavilly backporting the safaria khtml port (are you still with me
), so that's why konqueror does it better than firefox. I don't even speak of IE, it isn't worthy to be even mentioned.
Registered Linux user number 389291
Laptop: Nec Versa p550, Pentium M 1.86GHz, 1024MB ram, x300, 80 GB HD, bluetooth, 2915BG Wlan card
Desktop: Amd Athlon x2 4200+, 2GB ram, Geforce 7300GT 512MB silent, 160GB HD in a nice centurion 534 case :cool:
-
29th June 2005, 01:34 AM #11brisray Guest
I've just looked at it with
Windows XP - MSIE 6.0.29, Opera 7.54, Firefox 1, Netscape Navigator 7.2, WebTV Viewer
Mac OSX - MSIE 5.2, Netscape Navigator 7.2 and Safari 1.0.3
FC5 Linux - Konqueror 3.4.1, Firefox 1.0.4 and Linux Epiphany 1.7.1
Not one of them renders it properly.
Ray
-
29th June 2005, 01:45 AM #12rayyes Guest
hehe i don't need a test to tell me that IE is crappy. If only browsers respected some sort of standard(right), site developers wouldn't have to jump through hoops to try and please everyone.
-
29th June 2005, 08:49 AM #13ieuuk Guest
it is quite impressive the mess ie makes of it though
-
29th June 2005, 04:21 PM #14brisray Guest
I've now got two really simple pages with the images on them - http://brisray.com/test/css2/gary.htm and http://brisray.com/test/css2/acid.htm
Some interesting effects. It looks like all the browsers have a way to go before they are completely compliant - some more than others. Until they are it looks like web developers have to ...
a) "dumb down" their sites
b) add a lot of code to cope with the differences
c) target individual browsers
RayLast edited by brisray; 29th June 2005 at 04:42 PM. Reason: rubbish grammar
-
29th June 2005, 05:09 PM #15tejas Guest
If no browser can render it exactly, then who sets these standards?
How do we know what that picture is 'supposed' to look like?
Similar Threads
-
What is your favorite type of music, favorite band?
By carlc in forum WibbleReplies: 78Last Post: 30th March 2006, 04:51 PM -
Favorite browser
By fc_jeff in forum Linux ChatReplies: 10Last Post: 9th April 2005, 04:36 PM -
What are your favorite forums?
By micha in forum WibbleReplies: 15Last Post: 17th June 2004, 01:29 PM
Posting Permissions
[[template footer(Guest)]]