FedoraForum.org - Fedora Support Forums and Community
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    bob's Avatar
    bob is online now Administrator (yeah, back again)
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Colton, NY; Junction of Heaven & Earth (also Routes 56 & 68).
    Age
    72
    Posts
    23,339

    F17 Reaches EOL

    As of 30th July 2013, Fedora 17 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 17. A previous reminder was sent on July 3rd [0]. Fedora 18 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 20. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [1]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [2] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Cheers, Dennis Gilmore
    Linux & Beer - That TOTALLY Computes!
    Registered Linux User #362651


    Don't use any of my solutions on working computers or near small children.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    behind that screen...
    Posts
    929

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    well... there goes another good version...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    322

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    Quote Originally Posted by solo2101
    well... there goes another good version...
    Aye, 17 has been very good to me, and I really don't want to fight with the Anaconda mess to get another Fedora version.

    RIP F17.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    337

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    Methinks this has surely been discussed somewhere, but given that most "serious" pieces of software--please don't ask me to define what that means--can take 18 months or more to conceive and bring to production, how do other people here handle software development on Fedora? Do you simply update to the latest version and hope that everything will work? Or do you use a different distribution, perhaps a long-term one with a penchant for alliterative names?
    Registered user # 441814

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Age
    50
    Posts
    514

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    Quote Originally Posted by Reisswolf
    Or do you use a different distribution, perhaps a long-term one with a penchant for alliterative names?
    Well, there's always RHEL and CentOS.

    CronoCloud

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    337

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    Both excellent distributions, and would have been my primary choices but for the fact that their repositories don't always have the latest versions of the packages. And I am someone who prefers to install packages (almost) exclusively through the package manager and keep manual installations down to a minimum. (Opera is the only exception I can point to.)

    CentOS and Red Hat are still using 2.x kernels. It says clearly on Red Hat's page that kernel upgrades should only be done through yum. But the repositories don't have the latest kernels. (I would have thought that Debian's use of kernel 3.2 would be suuficient to establish the stability and viability of the newer kernels.)

    Another problem is that the repositories don't have version 4 of OCaml, my primary language on Linux (along with C). There have been a few upgrades to the language from version 3.12; these are not present in the repositories.

    Otherwise, I would have almost certainly used CentOS.

    But until then, Fedora and Ubuntu will have to suffice.
    Registered user # 441814

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    322

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    Quote Originally Posted by Reisswolf
    Both excellent distributions, and would have been my primary choices but for the fact that their repositories don't always have the latest versions of the packages. And I am someone who prefers to install packages (almost) exclusively through the package manager and keep manual installations down to a minimum.
    That is exactly why I originally chose Fedora, and why I am reluctant to change.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Waldorf, Maryland
    Posts
    7,346

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    Quote Originally Posted by Reisswolf
    Both excellent distributions, and would have been my primary choices but for the fact that their repositories don't always have the latest versions of the packages. And I am someone who prefers to install packages (almost) exclusively through the package manager and keep manual installations down to a minimum. (Opera is the only exception I can point to.)

    CentOS and Red Hat are still using 2.x kernels. It says clearly on Red Hat's page that kernel upgrades should only be done through yum. But the repositories don't have the latest kernels. (I would have thought that Debian's use of kernel 3.2 would be suuficient to establish the stability and viability of the newer kernels.)

    Another problem is that the repositories don't have version 4 of OCaml, my primary language on Linux (along with C). There have been a few upgrades to the language from version 3.12; these are not present in the repositories.

    Otherwise, I would have almost certainly used CentOS.

    But until then, Fedora and Ubuntu will have to suffice.
    Not just that... the latest kernels have changes that make the older versions of KVM/VMware/Xen user space tools fail.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,761

    Re: F17 Reaches EOL

    There’s also Rawhide, if you’re doing software development and want to ensure that your code works with the latest releases.

    Ultimately, if you’re doing Linux development and want to target more than one distribution (or version), you (or at least your team) will need to be prepared to work with multiple installations anyway.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 3rd July 2013, 07:43 PM
  2. F16 eol, f17->f18
    By yaxattax in forum Installation, Upgrades and Live Media
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 17th January 2013, 07:42 PM
  3. Unvanquished Reaches Alpha 9
    By mmix in forum Gamers' Lounge
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14th November 2012, 12:36 PM
  4. Songbird reaches version 1.0.0 status
    By Wayne in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 9th January 2009, 02:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •