FedoraForum.org - Fedora Support Forums and Community

View Poll Results: Which update method do you prefer?

Voters
220. You may not vote on this poll
  • Adventurous

    156 70.91%
  • Conservative

    64 29.09%
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 110
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    4,327

    POLL: Fedora updates - conservative or adventurous?

    Those of you who read the development mailing list (you poor, poor people) may have noticed this week's egregious bitchfest^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Henthusiastic discussion on the topic of Fedora's update strategy.

    Because I'm an experienced poop-stirrer^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hinterested in the views of users, I thought "hey, what this thread REALLY needs is a highly unscientific forum poll!"

    So, here it is. Which update strategy do you prefer - conservative or adventurous? EDIT: just to be totally clear, this is about stable releases - what kind of updates do you want for a given Fedora release after it comes out. Here's some definitions:

    conservative - usually defined as updates being pushed only to fix security issues and specific, serious bugs. New versions of software are not pushed as updates as a matter of course.

    adventurous - new versions of software are pushed as updates, along with security fixes when no new version is available. Particularly disruptive updates are not pushed, being held for the next release instead.

    At present, Fedora uses a mixture of both. Fr'instance, the GNOME team follows the conservative path (if Fedora 12 comes out with GNOME 2.28, you don't get GNOME 2.30 as an update), while the KDE team follows the adventurous path (they do ship new major KDE versions as updates).

    Some of the proposals under discussion would essentially provide both paths, but what I'm interested in with this poll is which of the two paths you personally prefer, so if you would prefer the distribution to implement a system giving users a choice, just vote for whichever option you'd choose in that case.

    This'll be fun. Heh.
    Last edited by AdamW; 5th March 2010 at 08:12 PM.
    Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
    Fedora QA Community Monkey
    IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
    http://www.happyassassin.net

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tallahassee
    Age
    33
    Posts
    337
    Adventurous! Updates have almost never broken anything for me, and when they have it's been minor with a fix waiting on this forum. On the other hand, updates often fix things. One day I updated Rhythmbox and cover art appeared on my Ipod where it hadn't before. It was like Christmas .

    If I wanted to use stagnating software, I'd use Ubuntu .

  3. #3
    leigh123linux Guest
    I find Rawhide conservative .

  4. #4
    pete_1967 Guest
    If I wanted conservative, I'd be running RHEL/ CentOS.

  5. #5
    PabloTwo's Avatar
    PabloTwo is offline "Registered User" T-Shirt Winner
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Seville, FL
    Posts
    7,568
    Well, I would have pressed the button "in the middle" of the poll choices. You know, that "somewhere between conservative and adventurous" button.

    I like that Fedora keeps up somewhat fairly well with current releases of software, but I am definitely not one of those "gotta have the latest version, of whatever, just because, well, it's the latest version" people.

    I like updating to software that works. If that means a package spending a little more time in updates-testing before being pushed into updates, that's just fine with me. To err is human, but it's got to be more than a little embarrassing to a package maintainer to push a package into updates that won't even launch (a recent update of Sunbird comes to mind). Bet it never saw one second in updates-testing and the package builder never bothered to install and run it on his/her own system first. Arhg!

    Especially since I have slow dial-up, I get all "grrrrrrrry" when I update a package or packages only to have to update the same package(s) within a day or two 'cuz someone goofed. Fingers are pointing more at the RPM Fusion package maintainers here than at Fedora on this gripe. There's been a rash of this coming from RPM Fusion repos lately.

    So, if I had to pick between the two poll choices, I guess it'd be "conservative".

  6. #6
    kyryder Guest
    To me Fedora should = Adventurous . Isn't that the whole idea behind Fedora? Although, it would be nice to be adventurous for packages that are downgradeable and conservative with packages that are not downgradeable but that may be a different barrel of monkeys altogether.

    When I want conservative I run RHEL/CentOS.

    Ky

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    MT USA
    Posts
    886
    If I wanted conservative, I'd be running RHEL/ CentOS.
    I am of the same thought.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,059
    Either way of updating can be the wrong way or the the correct way depending on what the programs inside the package is doing and how much you understand Fedora (Linux) to recover from a situation.

    But in general, if one is conservative in updating, they would be constantly fighting bugs and broken conditions, the same exact things that too aggressive updating creates, but with a known fallback path (yesterdays updates) or just a waiting period (try again tomorrow.)

    It really isn't about one's personality, it's about knowledge of what one is doing.
    This overall base knowledge takes years to collect.
    So in a nutshell, those that get Fedora update and those switching over from the Disney Channel don't have a clue.

    SJ
    Do the Math

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Paris, TX
    Posts
    24,099
    This is fedora we're talking about here?

    Damn the torpedoes, man!

    Live!
    Laugh!
    Love!

    ...

    Re-install! <....>

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,059
    Exactly,

    SJ
    Do the Math

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mexico City
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,111
    I consider it's best for Fedora to take de adventurous path and although I use a mixture of both sometimes, that's the approach I preffer because it drives innovation.

    For example I like the fact that thanks to Fedora's adventurous approach, new hardware is supported faster; on the other hand if I happen to know in advance about a major issue with an upcoming update (like wifi being killed) I switch myself to the conservative approach by reducing the updates.

    However, Fedora's thing is to be bleeding edge, right?

    Thanks,
    Joe.
    Notebook: Samsung NP355 V4C
    AMD A6 VISION 4400M APU @ 2.7GHz, 4GB DDR3,
    1TB Toshiba HDD, TSSTcorp DVD-RW.
    Debian 9 x86-64.

  12. #12
    bob's Avatar
    bob is offline Administrator (yeah, back again)
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Colton, NY; Junction of Heaven & Earth (also Routes 56 & 68).
    Age
    72
    Posts
    23,358
    F14-Rawhide borked & froze dead in the middle of an update last night; CLI only after reboot, lost kernel; 716 updates..... Now that's LIVIN'! (fixed & good this AM, btw).
    Linux & Beer - That TOTALLY Computes!
    Registered Linux User #362651


    Don't use any of my solutions on working computers or near small children.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    4,327
    bob: er, I should note that the poll is about the updates in *stable* releases, not the way rawhide development should be approached. obviously it wouldn't be appropriate for rawhide to be 'conservative'.
    Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
    Fedora QA Community Monkey
    IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
    http://www.happyassassin.net

  14. #14
    leigh123linux Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamW
    Those of you who read the development mailing list (you poor, poor people) may have noticed this week's egregious bitchfest^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Henthusiastic discussion on the topic of Fedora's update strategy.

    Because I'm an experienced poop-stirrer^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hinterested in the views of users, I thought "hey, what this thread REALLY needs is a highly unscientific forum poll!"

    So, here it is. Which update strategy do you prefer - conservative or adventurous? EDIT: just to be totally clear, this is about stable releases - what kind of updates do you want for a given Fedora release after it comes out. Here's some definitions:

    conservative - usually defined as updates being pushed only to fix security issues and specific, serious bugs. New versions of software are not pushed as updates as a matter of course.

    adventurous - new versions of software are pushed as updates, along with security fixes when no new version is available. Particularly disruptive updates are not pushed, being held for the next release instead.

    At present, Fedora uses a mixture of both. Fr'instance, the GNOME team follows the conservative path (if Fedora 12 comes out with GNOME 2.28, you don't get GNOME 2.30 as an update), while the KDE team follows the adventurous path (they do ship new major KDE versions as updates).

    Some of the proposals under discussion would essentially provide both paths, but what I'm interested in with this poll is which of the two paths you personally prefer, so if you would prefer the distribution to implement a system giving users a choice, just vote for whichever option you'd choose in that case.

    This'll be fun. Heh.

    For those lucky bastards that missed the bitchfest

    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper...ry/131331.html

    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper...ch/132221.html

    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper...ch/132271.html



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    226
    My desktop I want to go the adventurous route. My server in the closet I want to be a little more conservative. Then again the server runs headless so if it falls down and can't get up it is a whole production to get it out of the closet etc. If it was close to a monitor and keyboard I would probably be feeling a little more risque about it. The gnome folks are pussies.

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. POLL: Fedora KDE Users
    By Clunixchit in forum Fedora Focus
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29th October 2006, 08:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •