<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>FedoraForum.org - Linux Chat</title>
		<link>https://forums.fedoraforum.org/</link>
		<description>The place to talk about anything linux-related outside of Fedora</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:56:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[[SOLVED] POPOS's Cosmic]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336626-POPOS-s-Cosmic&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[There is a Fedora Cosmic that follows the POPOS version.   On the 19th (5 days ago), there was a recent update of the latter.  
Is it possible that Fedora's cosmic version has pulled in the updates.  I much prefer remaining with Fedora deliverables 
as they tend to work well++.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>There is a Fedora Cosmic that follows the POPOS version.   On the 19th (5 days ago), there was a recent update of the latter. <br />
Is it possible that Fedora's cosmic version has pulled in the updates.  I much prefer remaining with Fedora deliverables<br />
as they tend to work well++.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?43-Linux-Chat">Linux Chat</category>
			<dc:creator>lsatenstein</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336626-POPOS-s-Cosmic</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Today, mid September 2026</title>
			<link>https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336617-Today-mid-September-2026&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:22:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The YouTube Linux presentor Lunduke, mentioned quite excitedly 
 
That For the quarter year ending Aug 31, . Linux North American Market Share has risen to 15%  
 
Actually, to 15.65% 
 
I do not live in Europe, but with European government use and conversion, their usage percentage is probably...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The YouTube Linux presentor Lunduke, mentioned quite excitedly<br />
<br />
That For the quarter year ending Aug 31, . Linux North American Market Share has risen to 15% <br />
<br />
Actually, to 15.65%<br />
<br />
I do not live in Europe, but with European government use and conversion, their usage percentage is probably closer to or above North American use<br />
<br />
<br />
I am curious to know &quot;How many people are still using Linux after one year since installation?&quot;</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?43-Linux-Chat">Linux Chat</category>
			<dc:creator>lsatenstein</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336617-Today-mid-September-2026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IBM/Redhat = ?</title>
			<link>https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336606-IBM-Redhat&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 16:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Well ... with 7 years in the rearview mirror, and therefore some actual real perspective, what do you think of the merger now? 
 
Personally, I liked it better when Redhat was unencumbered by serving a tech giant overlord.   Whereas before 2019, Redhat would have been my hands-down,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Well ... with 7 years in the rearview mirror, and therefore some actual real perspective, what do you think of the merger now?<br />
<br />
Personally, I liked it better when Redhat was unencumbered by serving a tech giant overlord.   Whereas before 2019, Redhat would have been my hands-down, automatic-without-thought go-to for commercial/enterprise level systems, I have to admit I'd be more inclined to slow down and think it over these days.   <br />
<br />
I can't point to any single reason why ... just a gut feeling.   But I'm also very willing to admit that might be more superstition than direct data supported.<br />
<br />
<br />
What say you?<br />
<br />
<br />
P.S.   On the plus side, your average Stink Pad certainly didn't suffer from the change.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?43-Linux-Chat">Linux Chat</category>
			<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336606-IBM-Redhat</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[France's Move To Linux]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336598-France-s-Move-To-Linux&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 05:48:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The move within the EU to control their sovereignty is shifting towards Linux on the Desktop.  One major move is France, who are moving quickly by Government standards.  Will this have long term consequences for Linux on the desktop or not?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The move within the EU to control their sovereignty is shifting towards Linux on the Desktop.  One major move is France, who are moving quickly by Government standards.  Will this have long term consequences for Linux on the desktop or not?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?43-Linux-Chat">Linux Chat</category>
			<dc:creator>robertdaleweir</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336598-France-s-Move-To-Linux</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>X11 vs Wayland</title>
			<link>https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336594-X11-vs-Wayland&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This topic came up in this thread: https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336588-new-install-worked-well-then-installed-xorg-and-pfft! Instead of hijacking that thread by continuing the discussion there, I thought it would be better to create a new thread here specifically for that topic. 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This topic came up in this thread: <a href="https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336588-new-install-worked-well-then-installed-xorg-and-pfft" target="_blank">https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showt...-xorg-and-pfft</a>! Instead of hijacking that thread by continuing the discussion there, I thought it would be better to create a new thread here specifically for that topic.<br />
<br />
This site has an interesting comparison of X11 and Wayland: <a href="https://gist.github.com/probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://gist.github.com/probonopd/9f...5e3a9f2d1f2277</a><br />
The author is obviously biased, and I wouldn't go so far as to say that &quot;Wayland breaks everything,&quot; but it is surprising how many features that long-time Linux/UNIX X11 users have taken for granted still aren't available in Wayland.<br />
<br />
For example, window shading—the ability to &quot;roll up&quot; a window to just its title bar—is a handy feature that I use every day in Window Maker. In Window Maker I can do it either by double-clicking the window's title bar or by hitting Ctrl-Alt-h in the window (then unroll with that same key combo when the title bar has focus). I'm so used to window shading after decades of using Window Maker (and fvwm before that), that I can't even imagine <i>not</i> being able to do that. Lots of other plain X11 window managers also have that feature (e.g. Enlightenment, IceWM, Openbox, Fluxbox and other *box variants). Even KDE Plasma has window shading under X11, but not under Wayland. Wayland has no native ability to do that, mainly because it lacks the equivalent of X11's WM_STATE property (which you can query with X11's xprop utility).<br />
<br />
In general Wayland doesn't expose all the window properties that X11 users take for granted, leaving that up to individual compositors (whose number and quality can vary) or by running X11 utilities under Xwayland (for X11 applications). The existence of Xwayland itself is a testament to X11's extensibility (superior to Wayland's), and is what has made Wayland even usable, as many X11 applications have not been rewritten for Wayland. Many of the GUI toolkits that started as X11 toolkits still don't have all their features available in Wayland. For example, in GTK3 some methods and objects aren't supported in Wayland and likely never will be (e.g. gtk_window_move(), gtk_window_get_position(), gtk_window_set_position(), gdk_window_get_pointer()).<br />
<br />
I know this topic can generate some strong opinions, so I'm interested to hear them, regardless of what &quot;side&quot; they're on.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?43-Linux-Chat">Linux Chat</category>
			<dc:creator>RupertPupkin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?336594-X11-vs-Wayland</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
