PDA

View Full Version : wine cant install and libxslt problem



ichihollow
22nd May 2008, 10:22 PM
[root@localhost 1085720330]# yum install wine
Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package wine.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: wine-ldap = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-nas = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-esd = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-tools = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-capi = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-core = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-cms = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-jack = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Processing Dependency: wine-twain = 0.9.58-1.fc9 for package: wine
--> Running transaction check
---> Package wine-nas.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package wine-capi.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package wine-twain.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package wine-cms.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: liblcms.so.1 for package: wine-cms
---> Package wine-tools.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package wine-ldap.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libldap_r-2.4.so.2 for package: wine-ldap
--> Processing Dependency: liblber-2.4.so.2 for package: wine-ldap
---> Package wine-core.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libGLU.so.1 for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc8) for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libxml2.so.2 for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libgphoto2.so.2 for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libXxf86vm.so.1 for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4) for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libGL.so.1 for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libasound.so.2 for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libgphoto2_port.so.0 for package: wine-core
--> Processing Dependency: libxslt.so.1 for package: wine-core
---> Package wine-jack.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package wine-esd.i386 0:0.9.58-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libaudiofile.so.0 for package: wine-esd
--> Processing Dependency: libesd.so.0 for package: wine-esd
--> Running transaction check
---> Package mesa-libGLU.i386 0:7.1-0.29.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package lcms-libs.i386 0:1.17-4.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package libxslt.i386 0:1.1.24-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package mesa-libGL.i386 0:7.1-0.29.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libdrm.so.2 for package: mesa-libGL
--> Processing Dependency: libXdamage.so.1 for package: mesa-libGL
---> Package openldap.i386 0:2.4.8-3.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libsasl2.so.2 for package: openldap
---> Package esound-libs.i386 1:0.2.38-7.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package gphoto2.i386 0:2.4.0-10.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libltdl.so.3 for package: gphoto2
--> Processing Dependency: libexif.so.12 for package: gphoto2
--> Processing Dependency: libreadline.so.5 for package: gphoto2
--> Processing Dependency: libusb-0.1.so.4 for package: gphoto2
--> Processing Dependency: libpopt.so.0 for package: gphoto2
--> Processing Dependency: libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0) for package: gphoto2
---> Package libXxf86vm.i386 0:1.0.1-5.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package alsa-lib.i386 0:1.0.16-3.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package libxml2.i386 0:2.6.32-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package audiofile.i386 1:0.2.6-8.fc9 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libdrm.i386 0:2.4.0-0.11.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package cyrus-sasl-lib.i386 0:2.1.22-13.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package libtool-ltdl.i386 0:1.5.24-6.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package popt.i386 0:1.13-3.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package readline.i386 0:5.2-13.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package libexif.i386 0:0.6.16-1.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package libXdamage.i386 0:1.1.1-4.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package libusb.i386 0:0.1.12-15.fc9 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

================================================== ===========================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================== ===========================
Installing:
wine i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 20 k
Installing for dependencies:
alsa-lib i386 1.0.16-3.fc9 fedora 407 k
audiofile i386 1:0.2.6-8.fc9 fedora 108 k
cyrus-sasl-lib i386 2.1.22-13.fc9 fedora 1.1 M
esound-libs i386 1:0.2.38-7.fc9 fedora 73 k
gphoto2 i386 2.4.0-10.fc9 fedora 1.5 M
lcms-libs i386 1.17-4.fc9 fedora 106 k
libXdamage i386 1.1.1-4.fc9 fedora 11 k
libXxf86vm i386 1.0.1-5.fc9 fedora 14 k
libdrm i386 2.4.0-0.11.fc9 fedora 28 k
libexif i386 0.6.16-1.fc9 fedora 235 k
libtool-ltdl i386 1.5.24-6.fc9 fedora 39 k
libusb i386 0.1.12-15.fc9 fedora 28 k
libxml2 i386 2.6.32-1.fc9 fedora 847 k
libxslt i386 1.1.24-1.fc9 updates 529 k
mesa-libGL i386 7.1-0.29.fc9 fedora 2.2 M
mesa-libGLU i386 7.1-0.29.fc9 fedora 220 k
openldap i386 2.4.8-3.fc9 fedora 311 k
popt i386 1.13-3.fc9 fedora 39 k
readline i386 5.2-13.fc9 fedora 184 k
wine-capi i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 25 k
wine-cms i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 40 k
wine-core i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 10 M
wine-esd i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 35 k
wine-jack i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 37 k
wine-ldap i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 87 k
wine-nas i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 23 k
wine-tools i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 636 k
wine-twain i386 0.9.58-1.fc9 fedora 46 k

Transaction Summary
================================================== ===========================
Install 29 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)

Total size: 19 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test


Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/xsltproc.1.gz from install of libxslt-1.1.24-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package libxslt-1.1.23-3.fc9.x86_64

Error Summary

ichihollow
22nd May 2008, 10:29 PM
ive deleted the file it says is causing the problem but i keep getting the same error. anyone have any ideas???

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 09:55 AM
earlier i went to install wine, it told me there was a conflict with libxsltxxxxxxxxxx(that was some version number) i had tried removing and finally deleting the file that terminal was telling me was conflicting with the install of wine, but it kept giving me the same error. So finally i went into terminal and tried yum remove libxsltxxxxxxxxxxxxx(whatever the version number was), didnt know what it was, so i tried just yum -y remove libxslt (yes i know the -y was stupid but its too late for that now isnt it?) well it removed the libxslt, and about 149 other things. wine installed but several other things were removed, including terminal!!! Now i noticed what it was doing and DID NOT close terminal, however i can not open another one, ( i was able to open two at a time before) a few programs where already reinstalled, like firefox, and ran the dangermouse auto install for FC9, but there are still alot of things missing. Im getting a pop up sayting "NetworkManager" cant continue, i go into terminal yum install NetworkManager and it tells me that its already installed noting to do. i tried yum update, and it tells me no packages marked for update. so im kind of lost at this point. I would like to not have to go about reinstalling FC. any help or even just a list of things i need to install would be awesome. if i can get a list of things i need to install i can search for how to install each thing if yum install progarmx doesnt work.

thanks guys

mik

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 10:02 AM
update, Archive Manager is also gone.

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 10:04 AM
new problem associated with this thread, a new thread has been started for this problem. this thread should be considered CLOSED.

new thread

http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1019770#post1019770

Wayne
27th May 2008, 10:08 AM
I think the two threads should be merged rather than closed, so others can follow all progress.

Wayne

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 10:11 AM
thanks for the help

Wayne
27th May 2008, 10:12 AM
No, you can't, but I did. I should have said "I've merged these two threads because....." Sorry for the confusion.

Wayne

asymptote
27th May 2008, 10:15 AM
Can you try a different package manager? I ran into this problem in ubuntu because I needed the build-essential package which couldn't be installed because I needed the libc6-dev library which couldn't be installed because the repositories had an earlier version so the package manager wouldn't install it. That is using apt.

So I tried installing using aptitude which automatically searched and found the problem - downgraded a couple packages so every dependency worked fine.

So is there a different package manager you can use? If not, just install it from source - works perfectly.

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 10:15 AM
its cool, thanks for all the help.

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 10:17 AM
the problem is that i cant install anything that cant be install through yum, as the only way to open rpms was through archive manager, but since thats not there anymore, i cant install another pachage manager. i thought about that too, i tried file roller.

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 11:08 AM
hey guys dont worry about it im going to do a reinstall tomorrow when i wake up.

asymptote
27th May 2008, 11:10 AM
Oh for god's sake please don't do that. There is nothing more humiliating than seeing someone re-install when the whole purpose of using a Linux-based distribution is that it should be more stable that proprietary operating systems. Granted, it all depends on what the user does with that operating system, but do you really need a re-install? Can't you fix it?

ichihollow
27th May 2008, 12:48 PM
Oh for god's sake please don't do that. There is nothing more humiliating than seeing someone re-install when the whole purpose of using a Linux-based distribution is that it should be more stable that proprietary operating systems. Granted, it all depends on what the user does with that operating system, but do you really need a re-install? Can't you fix it?

lol one its too late, two i was a xp service tech for 7 years, im really really new to linux, 3 i wanted to see if i could uninstall yum... but at that point i had already decided to reinstall anyways. there were 150 packages that would have needed to be reinstalled, it was faster to do this. and i only had one file to back up anyway, which i just emailed to myself.

the first thing i did was to install wine, so i wont have that problem, this thread can be closed or if people want to comment on or create a list of programs that would have been needed to be reinstalled, im sure it could be used to help other users.

also as a parting note, even though i was a windows tech for so long, im tired of it, thats why linux is my primary OS now. but this change happened less then a month ago so give me some time, ill catch up.

asymptote
28th May 2008, 03:15 AM
Just in case you haven't seen it, check out Stuff I've Learned About Wine (http://gaming.gwos.org/doku.php/wine:winestuff). I'm wine'ing a bunch of stuff and it's perfect :)