Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 30th May 2005, 03:08 PM
platomxv Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West of Boston, USA
Posts: 52
FC4 Test3 64bit version

I have sucessfully installed FC4 Test3 64 bit version. Now I want to update it to the current level using Yum. Here is the output from the command yum update:

Transaction Summary
================================================== ===========================
Install 9 Package(s)
Update 229 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 458 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man8/dmraid.8.gz from install of dmraid-1.0.0.rc8-FC4_5 conflicts with file from package dmraid-1.0.0.rc7-4_FC4

Before downloading, I executed the command: yum update yum which I believe points yum to the proper repositories.

It took about nine hours to download the 229 + 9 packages. I want to preserve these downloaded rpms. Comments and suggestions welcome,
Norm
  #2  
Old 30th May 2005, 06:14 PM
kennon's Avatar
kennon Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central California
Posts: 36
Use the command:
yum -y --exclude=dmraid-1.0.0.rc8-FC4_5 update

Was in the same boat with amd64 install last night and this went fine. The packages you have already downloaded are safely stored in the yum tmp dir so you won't have to redownload them. Good Luck!
__________________
All those moments will be lost in time...like tears in the rain...
  #3  
Old 30th May 2005, 07:50 PM
platomxv Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West of Boston, USA
Posts: 52
Thanks Kennon. As you already know, your suggestion solved my problem.
Norm
  #4  
Old 2nd June 2005, 06:16 PM
drunkahol Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich
Posts: 638
Purely informational - but I'm using FC4T3 AMD64 too.

Would be good to do a survey of registered users to see what installs of Fedora we run. Especially to see the percentage of AMD64 hardware users that still run i386 installs . . .

Can the forums do vote surveys?
  #5  
Old 2nd June 2005, 07:17 PM
c4raku Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
tried the amd64 build. had problems with missing or broken libs. ut04 and D3 refused to run even after getting all the missing stuff installed and sym linked. Droped back to i386 and so far no problems. Once the build is final and I find a better comfort level in linux i'll give 64 a shot again. Right now i cant tell if a bug is from beta, 32-64 bit snafu, or just needs the right config.
  #6  
Old 2nd June 2005, 10:09 PM
kennon's Avatar
kennon Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central California
Posts: 36
Hmmm. I have been running the 64-bit build all along and aside from a few --exception=xxx switches in my yum command I have had no issues with the amd64 build. I am running an Asus A8V Deluxe mobo, AMD64 3500+ (venice) cpu, onboard sound (AC'97), onboard LAN (Yukon), Maxtor 200Gb SATA/150 (fedora core4 t3), Western Digital 120Gb ATA/133 (windowsXP), Leadtek Geforce 6800GT. I have been doing an "everything" install since test1. I have formatted and performed fresh installs with each new test version. I will admit though that I don't run a lot of games on my linux partition. I did install enemy territory and got it running using 32-bit emulation but sound never worked. Video was fine. The only issue I run into is occassionally the 64-bit ports of apps comes quite a bit later than the i386 on repos like freshrpm and Dag. I think this will change though over the course of the next 2 years though as more and more people start buying 64-bit PC's now that WinBlowzXP has a 64-bit version.

Shoot, even the NVIDIA binary driver works "right out of the box" and that is a first for me across like 5 computers, 3 years and 4 versions of Fedora.
__________________
All those moments will be lost in time...like tears in the rain...

Last edited by kennon; 2nd June 2005 at 10:15 PM.
  #7  
Old 3rd June 2005, 07:50 PM
rramson Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
I tried running 64 bit FC4T2 and it worked fine until one kernel update kept rebooting my PC. I never got FC3 64 bit to install. Must be something with the hardware. I can't wait until the 13th to try FC4-64. Hopefully I will never have to look at another windows machine again.
__________________
CPU: AMD Athlon™ 64 Processor Model Number 3000+ 1.8GHz 512KB 939-pin
Motherboard: GA-K8NXP-SLI nForce4 SLI chipset
Memory: (2 total 2 GB) Kingston 1GB Kit (PC3200 / 400MHZ CL3A) DDR Memory
Video Card: eVGA GeForce 6600 / 256MB DDR / PCI Express / VGA / Video Card
Sound: Onboard
HDD: 2 IBM 120GB ( 1 for WinXP 64 bit & 1 for FC4T2)
Monitor: DCL / DCL9A / 19-Inch / SXGA / 700:1 / Black / 16ms / LCD Monitor :D
  #8  
Old 3rd June 2005, 07:58 PM
bytesniper's Avatar
bytesniper Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abq, NM
Age: 35
Posts: 1,158
ive been running FC4Test3-x86_64 since it was released and its been rock solid. FC4 should improve upon that and hopefully be even better, so anxiously i continue to wait
__________________
I am root. If you see me laughing you better have a backup.
  #9  
Old 8th June 2005, 04:12 PM
kylemaxwell Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 24
I'm running FC4T3 (x86_64 at home and i386 on the laptop) and it's worked pretty well. I have one issue with the clock running too fast, but I have a workaround for it so it's not a killer.

Actually, I think I'm going to keep the laptop on rawhide as it's mostly a development machine anyway and doesn't need to be too terribly stable.
  #10  
Old 8th June 2005, 04:48 PM
bytesniper's Avatar
bytesniper Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abq, NM
Age: 35
Posts: 1,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylemaxwll
I have one issue with the clock running too fast
this hasnt happened on any of my boxes but i hear its a APIC problem. if you disable it then the clock goes back to normal. in your boot line in grub add noapic somewhere in there around rhgb.
__________________
I am root. If you see me laughing you better have a backup.
  #11  
Old 8th June 2005, 05:05 PM
forceload Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Issues on install (mptscsih)

I've been trying to get Fedora Core 4 - Test 3 installed on my Asus A8V for the last few days. I do not use, nor do I have enabled, any of the SATA stuff. I do have an LSI logic 21320 card with three drives hanging off of it, 2 one channel 1, 1 on channel 2. The problem I am having is that on install, when anaconda loads the mptscsih driver, the system locks. I've done the noprobe option and added the drivers manually with the same result. I've tried different distro's and I have the same problem. The SCSI card is configured at default values. I'm fairly new to install problems; most of my other computers loaded linux fine. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance.
  #12  
Old 8th June 2005, 05:20 PM
kylemaxwell Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytesniper
this hasnt happened on any of my boxes but i hear its a APIC problem. if you disable it then the clock goes back to normal. in your boot line in grub add noapic somewhere in there around rhgb.
Yep, that's the workaround I'm using currently. It's just something that should be fixed, but it's definitely not a reason to avoid FC4 (a tip in the release notes would be useful though ).
 

Tags
64bit, fc4, test3, version

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Install the 64bit version or the 32bit,on a core2 duo? nlkrio Installation and Live Media 8 10th November 2007 08:04 PM
FC4 64bit and 32bit version in a computer with one harddisk lau0001 EOL (End Of Life) Versions 2 6th January 2006 04:41 PM
Intel Fortran compiler and FC4 Test3 64bit csaba Fedora Core 4 Test 3 18th June 2005 02:52 PM
do the ntfs rpms work for the 64bit version Shadow Skill Using Fedora 4 24th November 2004 04:58 AM


Current GMT-time: 23:07 (Saturday, 18-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat