 |
 |
 |
 |
| News Community information and the latest Fedora related news |

10th May 2005, 10:46 PM
|
 |
Retired Community Manager
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Slovenia
Age: 30
Posts: 1,713

|
|
|
Fedora Core 4 test3
Third and the last test release candidate before Fedora Core 4 stable is now avalible for download.
Bittorrent download -> http://torrent.linux.duke.edu/
More info -> http://fedoranews.org/blog/?p=659
Highlights:
* GCC 4.0
* GNOME 2.10
* KDE 3.4
* Native Eclipse 3.1M6 - Part of free Java stack
* MySQL 4.1
* PHP 5.0
* Xen 2 - Virtualization to run multiple versions of an OS
* GFS 6.1-0.pre22 - Cluster file system
* Evince 0.2.1 - Universal document viewer
* GDM 2.6 - Includes early login capability
|

10th May 2005, 11:24 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Plano, Texas, USA
Posts: 127

|
|
|
I am very glad to see Xen. Any experience with Xen 2?
yur
|

11th May 2005, 03:16 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S.E. USA
Age: 51
Posts: 135

|
|
|
Just finished the bittorrent download. I am getting ready to burn and install. I will let you know how it goes.
|

11th May 2005, 07:55 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Age: 25
Posts: 1,426

|
|
|
Going to download this afternoon (at school :P )
It's nice to see gcc4, is it faster then gcc3?
__________________
Registered Linux user number 389291
Laptop: Nec Versa p550, Pentium M 1.86GHz, 1024MB ram, x300, 80 GB HD, bluetooth, 2915BG Wlan card
Desktop: Amd Athlon x2 4200+, 2GB ram, Geforce 7300GT 512MB silent, 160GB HD in a nice centurion 534 case :cool:
|

11th May 2005, 10:42 AM
|
 |
Retired Community Manager
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Slovenia
Age: 30
Posts: 1,713

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bitrain
Going to download this afternoon (at school :P )
It's nice to see gcc4, is it faster then gcc3?
|
Read here -> http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/gcc4/index.html
|

11th May 2005, 03:17 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Age: 25
Posts: 1,426

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ghaefb
|
Bit disapointing, but I think good things will happen in the future. (I do a bit longer on a kernel compilation  )
__________________
Registered Linux user number 389291
Laptop: Nec Versa p550, Pentium M 1.86GHz, 1024MB ram, x300, 80 GB HD, bluetooth, 2915BG Wlan card
Desktop: Amd Athlon x2 4200+, 2GB ram, Geforce 7300GT 512MB silent, 160GB HD in a nice centurion 534 case :cool:
|

11th May 2005, 09:41 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 206

|
|
|
What's wrong with this picture?
__________________
athlon 64 3700+ san diego | asus a8n5x | x1900xt | 1GB
Compaq Presario R3000 (DP533AV) | Athlon XP-M 2800+ | 512MB | 54g WLAN | Geforce4 MX 420 Go 32M | 40GB | 15.4" WXGA
|

11th May 2005, 10:03 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 153

|
|
|
Just installed FC4T3...
...and it's "OK", but I'm surprised with the long list of packages that are no longer on even the DVD ISO. Significant examples include abiword, aumix, bzflag, xmms, pdksh (replaced by ksh), nedit, exim, gnuchess/xboard, Maelstrom, ncftp, pan, tuxracer and tora. Yes, I know you can probably get them from Fedora Extras, but considering the DVD ISO was "only" 2.7GB, it seems a bit strange to drop so many well-known packages.
BTW, is it just me or are there now *no* 3D games at all with Fedora Core 4's install media?! We seem to be going backwards in the games department w.r.t. what ships with FC nowadays...
|

12th May 2005, 02:15 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brasília, Brazil
Age: 32
Posts: 11

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Heon2574
What's wrong with this picture?
|
Maybe because you're using MD5SUM instead of SHA1SUM?
The hashes are for SHA1SUM and no more for MD5SUM, AFAIK...
|

12th May 2005, 02:29 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Age: 34
Posts: 90

|
|
|
Gcc4
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bitrain
Going to download this afternoon (at school :P )
It's nice to see gcc4, is it faster then gcc3?
|
GCC4 has actually shown signs of regression in performance.
I have done my own tests and found personally that GCC3.4 is slightly quicker.
Here is a Slashdot Post to back by post.
http://developers.slashdot.org/artic...&tid=156&tid=8
__________________
CCA-XP, CCNP, CCSE-NG, AIX/Linux Specialist
Quote "Software is like sex, it's better when it's free." - Linus Torvalds
Wine FC4 RPM's
Main Site
Mirror (Host by Marq)
|

12th May 2005, 02:55 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,317

|
|
|
What exactly is the purpose of Xen?
__________________
Ware wa mutekinari.
Wa ga kage waza ni kanau mono nashi.
Wa ga ichigeki wa mutekinari.
Please vote for this bug and help me make GAYT [Go As You Type ]a standard option in Firefox.
|

12th May 2005, 03:11 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: That toddlin' town...
Posts: 296

|
|
|
A school of Mahayana Buddhism that asserts that enlightenment can be attained through the Linux kernel, open source software, and finally getting that nVidia card to load, rather than through faith and devotion.
|

12th May 2005, 04:30 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,317

|
|
|
LOL don't you mean ati card?
__________________
Ware wa mutekinari.
Wa ga kage waza ni kanau mono nashi.
Wa ga ichigeki wa mutekinari.
Please vote for this bug and help me make GAYT [Go As You Type ]a standard option in Firefox.
|

12th May 2005, 05:21 AM
|
 |
Community Manager
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,367

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shadow Skill
What exactly is the purpose of Xen?
|
Fedora Xen Quickstart
__________________
Desktop CPU: AMD Phenom II(tm) X4 Processor 940 AM2+ - Memory: 8GB DDR2-RAM - GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 v2 - OS: Fedora 18 Spherical Cow x86-64 and Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit
Laptop Toshiba Satellite C650D - OS: Fedora 19 Schrödinger's Cat (preview release) x86-64 and Microsoft Windows 7 64-bit
|

12th May 2005, 05:21 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 206

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Salomao
Maybe because you're using MD5SUM instead of SHA1SUM?
The hashes are for SHA1SUM and no more for MD5SUM, AFAIK...
|
OMG I can't believe i missed that. I just learned something new today - I don't read carefully enough and there's a sha1sum. Thank you.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 04:18 (Sunday, 26-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|