Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > Fedora 17/18 > Using Fedora
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Using Fedora General support for current versions. Ask questions about Fedora and it's software that do not belong in any other forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th March 2004, 03:40 PM
masteq's Avatar
masteq Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 26
Security Patches

What is the process for fixes coming into Fedora when something like this comes out:

http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-5174...l?tag=nefd_top

Will this get automatically patched with yum or apt?

I guess the bigger question is: can we assume that yum or apt are applying the patches as appropriate for all new vulerabilities. Or are the vulerabilities just coming out of the Fedora community.

Please advise.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18th March 2004, 05:18 PM
mike's Avatar
mike Offline
Retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Age: 45
Posts: 199
Yun should get the updates (about a day slower) is you use the yum.conf from http://fedora.artoo.net/faq/.

Apt should works also, if you downloaded it from freshrpms or Dag.

Mike
__________________
Mike Basinger: mike@fedoraforum.org
Linux Registered User # 371887
"The hardest questions in life are the once worth answering."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22nd March 2004, 09:29 PM
Fedoran00bi Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Age: 41
Posts: 24
I have a feeling this is a very unsecure distro of Linux.

Where using old kernel, outdated packages, the fedora updates are behind.

Last edited by Fedoran00bi; 25th March 2004 at 04:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24th March 2004, 02:07 AM
Bana's Avatar
Bana Offline
Retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 26
Posts: 581
Umm, I don't really know where you are coming from but if you think that Fedora is an unstable OS then you can help turn the situation around by posting security patches and reports on bugzilla. Everyone can help in the community, I challenge you to.
__________________
http://coolhands.blogspot.com/
binarybana AT gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th March 2004, 11:53 PM
Jman Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 27
Posts: 7,909
Quote:
Originally posted by Fedoran00bi
How can we trust this OS?
How can you trust any OS?

Every new Fedora kernel comes with some fixes. It's lagging a couple minor versions behind http://kernel.org/ because of the testing and packaging.

I feel reasonably secure running Fedora. Whether or not I should is another matter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th March 2004, 03:17 AM
mhelios Offline
Retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Queensland, AU
Posts: 736
It's actually not lagging behind kernel.org in any regard. The RedHat kernel developers, mainly Dave Jones, backports all relevant features, updates and secuirty fixes into the 2.4.22 (in the case if FC1). Red Hat uses it's own naming conventions as do all distros and as such will not haver the same version numbers as the mainline.

If you have a look at the errata pages for Fedora's security fixes and say RHEL, Fedora's fixes are released usually within a day of the Enterprise Red Hat product. This is pretty good for a project Red Hat sponsors but not officially supports.

I get all my updates, security or other easily and quickly with the up2date panel applet. And all within the quickest timeframe available once the patch is completed.
__________________
mhelios@fedoraforum.org
Registered Linux User # 348963
GnuPG KeyID: 0xCE9F8922
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th March 2004, 03:52 AM
Fedoran00bi Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Age: 41
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally posted by Jman
How can you trust any OS?

Every new Fedora kernel comes with some fixes. It's lagging a couple minor versions behind http://kernel.org/ because of the testing and packaging.

I feel reasonably secure running Fedora. Whether or not I should is another matter.
Jman, ive seen a huge increase in linux insecurities, even more insecure then windows. Im just concered.. like the OpenSSL for example, it took fedora how long to put it in updates dir...a week? 2 weeks?, its been a while. Also see new apache out, and didnt see a new version in updates....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th March 2004, 06:46 PM
zoodayz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nebraska USA
Age: 35
Posts: 45
But windows

Count the updates for windows compared to Linux and Microsoft. Microsoft decides what and "IF IF IF" core software code they will patch and the IF is if it is a really bad thing to there software Like this thing keeps on sutting down my computer "win32" we will fix that. But you tell me when the Usa Fbi comes to Microsoft and forces Microsoft to put a open port in the software JUST FOR THE FBI. How secure is that? but go spend $25,000 yes twenty five thousand dollers for Microsoft software and yes they have some that cost that much and take a look at how many updates it has lots and lots and lots. As it goes for fedora running a little behind thats also a good thing. We come out with this update and oops we should have not done that so lets update again to fix it but joe on the other end is running the newest of updates and is now vulnerable. ZoodayZ......
__________________
[COLOR=Blue]This message is powered by Fedora /COLOR]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27th March 2004, 07:41 PM
Fedoran00bi Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Age: 41
Posts: 24
Re: But windows

Quote:
Originally posted by zoodayz
But you tell me when the Usa Fbi comes to Microsoft and forces Microsoft to put a open port in the software JUST FOR THE FBI. How secure is that?
There is over 65 thousand ports on a microsoft OS, you tell me which port the FBI forced microsoft to open.

Also, if anyone here knows about security, you gotta patch. If you dont patch, holes will be open, and if someone drops a kernel level rootkit on your Linux box, I dont think your gonna be too happy. Especially if the Linux box is in production.

Im just saying, fedora needs to throw the updated patches alittle faster on there update DIR, after the vendor releases it.

Apache 2.0.49 update is out, is it on the fedora update site yet?

I dont think so.

Im not kocking linux or fedora, Im just saying I dont wanna have to wait weeks to get an updated package.
The day the vendor releases it, is the day it should be available for us to download and install it.

Ez.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
patches, security

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I keep a system up to date with ONLY security patches? MaryStern Security and Privacy 22 10th October 2007 05:29 PM
Firefox security patches controversy? imdeemvp Fedora Focus 12 24th July 2005 07:10 AM
Where will security errata and patches be available? rsr Using Fedora 3 14th November 2003 10:12 PM


Current GMT-time: 19:42 (Tuesday, 21-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat