Quote:
Originally Posted by jsandys
What is the correct answer for "Install boot loader on /dev/sda?" to get a dual boot of F16 and F17-Beta?
|
I would let the beta installer replace GRUB 1.99 from Fedora 16, with GRUB 2.00 ~beta2 or 3 or wherever it's at now, because its grub2-mkconfig is vastly better. (Although I admit I have not tried it with two Fedoras, only Fedora + Mac OS + Windows).
And the reason I'd do this is because two Fedora should co-habitat, and GRUB 2 should be agreeable. If not, it needs to get sorted out with a bug report, and since you're beta testing... you've sorta volunteered.
Why can't Anaconda see that I have F16 (or other linux with grub2) is installed and F17-Beta is being added, and suggest an answer?
Anaconda doesn't look. It runs grub2-mkconfig which is going to write out a new grub.cfg but only in the F17 beta vg-lv. So if you didn't replace the F16 GRUB with F17's GRUB, the old one is still looking for the F16 grub.cfg which will not have been updated to see F17.
Quote:
|
Or at least, how about a help file displayed with this question?
|
Oh sweet Jesus on a stick. I'm a Mac user and even I would never expect this. You're beta testing. Your help file is this forum.
Quote:
|
It is impossible to pull up the installation guide (which doesn't answer this question) while Anaconda is running.
|
Umm, docs are still being written...
Quote:
|
I hope I can fix this soon, I want to show off F17-Beta at LinuxFest NorthWest this weekend.
|
I know for sure single install with VBox and KVM work.
---------- Post added at 07:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:47 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsandys
What is the correct answer for "Install boot loader on /dev/sda?" to get a dual boot of F16 and F17-Beta?
|
Sorry. Leave it checked as default which should be /dev/sda.
If this isn't replacing old with new, I think that's a bug.