Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 22nd October 2011, 11:38 AM
billybob linux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 337
linuxchrome
Update Failed Today..?

I just done an update today and I got a notification that updates failed.
This the Beta of F16 installed yesterday

Two items failed to update:
Quote:
sssd-System Security Services Daemon
And

Quote:
sssd-client-SSSD Client libraries for NSS and PAM
Here is a description of the updates:

Quote:
This update will fix bugs and other non-critical problems.
This notification was issued on 20/10/2011 02:18.
2011-10-21: Added selinux-policy and updated SSSD with explicit Requires


FreeIPA:

== What happened to 2.1.2 ?
After looking at this I installed FreeIPA.
On checking the FreeIPA version I see that it is
2.1.3-4.fc16.
I might be wrong but are these updates for an older version of FreeIPA, then again I might be off on completely the wrong track.
Do I even need these updates, have I missed something ? Is there something enabled or disabled in the configuration that needs setting up that I missed?

It's not a showstopper but more of a minor annoyance right now. After all this is still the beta version (F16)
  #2  
Old 22nd October 2011, 12:29 PM
fantab's Avatar
fantab Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
Posts: 84
linuxfirefox
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Yes it failed for me too I used yum update.

Quote:
Error: Package: sssd-1.6.2-3.fc16.x86_64 (updates-testing)
Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.10.0-46
Installed: selinux-policy-3.10.0-45.1.fc16.noarch (@updates-testing)
selinux-policy = 3.10.0-45.1.fc16
Available: selinux-policy-3.10.0-40.fc16.noarch (fedora)
selinux-policy = 3.10.0-40.fc16
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
More Info about the update:
Quote:
This update will fix bugs and other non-critical problems.
This notification was issued on 10/20/2011.
2011-10-21: Added selinux-policy and updated SSSD with explicit Requires
FreeIPA:
== What happened to 2.1.2!? ==
Right after tagging 2.1.2 we found an upgrade issue that would have affected any users using the selfsign CA (installed with --selfsign). We decided to hold back the release, fix a few more bugs, and just push out 2.1.3 instead about a week later. So here we are.
== Highlights in 2.1.3 ==
• Enforce that system hostname matches hostname of IPA server.
• Require that /etc/hosts is sane even when configuring DNS.
• Increase default server-side LDAP search limits.
• Client enrollment improvements including longer wait for sssd to start, recovery if discovered IPA server is not responsive and when anonymous bind is disabled in 389-ds.
== Highlights in 2.1.2 ==
• Upgrade older dogtag installs to use new PKI proxy configuration
• hbactest improvements
• Added platform-independent code to make ipa-client-install more portable
• Make client uninstaller more robust, should restore state more completely.
• UI usability improvements
• Tool for Enabling/Disabling Managed Entry Plugins
• Managed Entries configuration is now replicated
• IPv6 client enrollment improvements
• Man page improvements
• Performance improvements when calculating indirect membership
• Improved handling of disabled anonymous binds in 389-ds
• user is now prompted to enter current password when changing to a new password
• ipa server now support multiple namingContexts. ipa-client-install and password migration were fixed
== Upgrading ==
To upgrade a 2.0.0, 2.0.1 or 2.1.0 server do the following: # yum update freeipa-server --enablerepo=updates-testing
This will pull in updated freeIPA, 389-ds, dogtag, libcurl and xmlrpc-c packages (and perhaps some others). A script will be executed in the rpm postinstall phase to update the IPA LDAP server with any required changes.
There is a bug reported against 389-ds, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730387, related to read-write locks. The NSPR RW lock implementation does not safely allow re-entrant use of reader locks. This is a timing issue so it is difficult to predict. During testing one user experienced this and the upgrade hung. To break the hang kill the ns-slapd process for your realm, wait for the yum transaction to complete, then restart 389-ds and manually run the update process:
# service dirsrv start # ipa-ldap-updater --update
The ipa-client-install tool in the ipa-client package is just a configuration tool. There should be no need to re-run this on every client already enrolled.
SSSD: == Highlights ==
• Improved handling of users and groups with multi-valued name attributes (aliases)
• Performance enhancements * Initgroups on RFC2307bis/FreeIPA * HBAC rule processing
• Improved process-hang detection and restarting
• Enabled the midpoint cache refresh by default (fewer cache misses on commonly-used entries)
• Cleaned up the example configuration
389-ds-base:
• fix config del/add mods
• memberof is transaction aware resource
• limits for simple paged results
• Native systemd support
• Fix for managed entry
• Fixed source tarball
• fix transaction support in ldbm_delete

For more information about this update please visit this website:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda...ORA-2011-14614.
For more information about bugs fixed by this update please visit these websites:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699785.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741744.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743966.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740942.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742324.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695736.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735114.
This is a test update, and is not designed for normal use. Please report any problems or regressions you encounter.
__________________
"Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
-Linus Torvalds

Last edited by fantab; 22nd October 2011 at 12:36 PM. Reason: added more info
  #3  
Old 22nd October 2011, 12:40 PM
ah7013's Avatar
ah7013 Offline
Registered "Cashew" User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 614
linuxfirefox
Re: Update Failed Today..?

It failed here too - both with a yum update and Apper (New KDE PackageKit frontend in Fedora 16).
__________________
Running Mageia 3 (KDE 4.10) on an ASUS K55V (Core i5, 16GB RAM, 750GB HDD, Nvidia 610M)
  #4  
Old 22nd October 2011, 04:48 PM
billybob linux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 337
linuxchrome
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Thanks for the feedback and help here Since others are seeing the same issue with the update, I guess it will eventually be looked at. I can live with it, no problem, but I thought I would flag it up in case this was something related to my own setup here, I just set Apper to "never" for updates for now and will change it in a few days or if a fix is released. Thanks guys

Last edited by billybob linux; 22nd October 2011 at 05:00 PM.
  #5  
Old 22nd October 2011, 05:34 PM
xjonquilx's Avatar
xjonquilx Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 131
linuxchrome
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Yum update is failing here too. I get this:

Code:
jonquil@jonquil ~$ sudo yum update
[sudo] password for jonquil: 
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Error: no such table: packages
__________________
~ Toshiba L755D-S5204 running F17 ~
  #6  
Old 22nd October 2011, 09:32 PM
monkeypigs Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
linuxfirefox
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Fresh install today, and exactly the same here. Anyone any suggestions?
Thanks
  #7  
Old 22nd October 2011, 09:47 PM
fedvasu's Avatar
fedvasu Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 382
linuxfirefox
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeypigs View Post
Fresh install today, and exactly the same here. Anyone any suggestions?
Thanks
just skip those updates , here is how , it will be fixed eventually
Code:
yum update --skip-broken
as posted by others ,bug in bugzilla has been filed , don't worry about it.
__________________
Programming is one of the most difficult branches of applied mathematics; the poorer mathematicians had better remain pure mathematicians.
--Edward W. Dijkstra
  #8  
Old 23rd October 2011, 12:34 AM
xjonquilx's Avatar
xjonquilx Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 131
linuxchrome
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Updating is working fine now here.
__________________
~ Toshiba L755D-S5204 running F17 ~
  #9  
Old 23rd October 2011, 06:34 AM
billybob linux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 337
linuxchrome
Re: Update Failed Today..?

@xjonquilx, glad to see you have your updates working. Reading your post I think you may have had a slightly different update issue.

I have just tried again and the update fails with the same two updates I posted at the start of the thread and it might be related to recent installs (from reading other posts such as monkeypigs)) .
As fedvasu said it will get fixed at some point. I am using F16 Beta and to me this is a minor update issue and everything else is running well so far, not bad for a Beta release

Again, thanks for the feedback everybody, much appreciated.
  #10  
Old 23rd October 2011, 11:37 AM
monkeypigs Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
linuxfirefox
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Here's the following output when I use --skip-broken

Code:
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
    sssd-1.6.2-3.fc16.x86_64 from updates-testing
Error: Protected multilib versions: sssd-client-1.6.2-3.fc16.x86_64 != sssd-client-1.6.1-1.fc16.i686

I also tried yum -y install yum-skip-broken which suceeded, but then went to update again which gave the exact same issue,

I realise that this issue will be addressed, but how can I get the other 300 updates that are waiting to be downloaded whilst this is fixed?

Many thanks
Iain

[EDIT]
Sorry, still getting used to Fedora after switching from Ubuntu, I disabled the testing repo and now the download is working like a charm
[/EDIT]

Last edited by monkeypigs; 23rd October 2011 at 12:06 PM.
  #11  
Old 23rd October 2011, 12:37 PM
YeOK's Avatar
YeOK Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North West UK.
Age: 32
Posts: 510
linuxchrome
Re: Update Failed Today..?

You can grab the updated packages from koji, they will probably get pushed soon enough anyway.

Just run,

Code:
sudo yum update http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/selinux-policy/3.10.0/46.fc16/noarch/selinux-policy-targeted-3.10.0-46.fc16.noarch.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/selinux-policy/3.10.0/46.fc16/noarch/selinux-policy-3.10.0-46.fc16.noarch.rpm
or grab the required files directly from koji (The Fedora build system): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b...buildID=269914

After that, you can update as normal.
__________________
He who asks a question is a fool for a minute; he who does not remains a fool forever.

Last edited by YeOK; 23rd October 2011 at 12:44 PM.
  #12  
Old 23rd October 2011, 01:20 PM
billybob linux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 337
linuxchrome
Re: Update Failed Today..?

@YeOK That line of code has worked, updates are now all complete, thanks
Once again, thanks everybody for the help.
  #13  
Old 23rd October 2011, 01:36 PM
ah7013's Avatar
ah7013 Offline
Registered "Cashew" User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 614
linuxfirefox
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Thanks YeOK, that worked and I can now update.
__________________
Running Mageia 3 (KDE 4.10) on an ASUS K55V (Core i5, 16GB RAM, 750GB HDD, Nvidia 610M)
  #14  
Old 23rd October 2011, 09:37 PM
cyborg's Avatar
cyborg Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brackley, England
Age: 22
Posts: 180
linuxchrome
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by YeOK View Post
You can grab the updated packages from koji, they will probably get pushed soon enough anyway.

Just run,

Code:
sudo yum update http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/selinux-policy/3.10.0/46.fc16/noarch/selinux-policy-targeted-3.10.0-46.fc16.noarch.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/selinux-policy/3.10.0/46.fc16/noarch/selinux-policy-3.10.0-46.fc16.noarch.rpm
or grab the required files directly from koji (The Fedora build system): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b...buildID=269914

After that, you can update as normal.
Good shout, works a treat.
__________________
[joe@host]
  #15  
Old 23rd October 2011, 11:04 PM
LightDot Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Out there
Age: 38
Posts: 90
linuxfirefox
Re: Update Failed Today..?

Temporarily excluding sssd-client and sssd also works for me:

Code:
yum update -x sssd-client -x sssd
 

Tags
failed, today, update

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
yum update failes today... bjorntj Using Fedora 14 17th April 2011 02:45 AM
Did F11 update today and no more USB mouse wmelnick Using Fedora 3 15th September 2009 01:20 AM
Troubles to log after today update Javier Santoyo Using Fedora 1 13th September 2009 05:01 AM
Update today, yum stuffed.. galaxian Using Fedora 5 12th November 2007 12:22 PM
Anyone else having update problems today? coyoteboy Using Fedora 7 20th July 2007 01:21 PM


Current GMT-time: 18:40 (Tuesday, 21-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat