 |
 |
 |
 |
| F16 Development This section archived once F16 reached final release. |

2nd August 2011, 04:36 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
BTRFS and F16
is BTRFS still oncourse to be made default for F16?
|

2nd August 2011, 09:07 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,549

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
Hi
Follow along in the devel mailing list and you will get to know. All decisions are made in public
__________________
Rahul
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram
|

2nd August 2011, 09:58 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
Quote:
Originally Posted by RahulSundaram
Hi
Follow along in the devel mailing list and you will get to know. All decisions are made in public
|
Rahul, i always follow the devel list, i havent seen anything mentioned whether its still gonna be default or not but i do recall Josef saying that a few things are unlikely to be completed before F16 goes final. i could probably dig that thread up, which has the post from Josef linked in it . im not exactly sure what he meant by that though? im assuming a workinable fsck will be in BTRFS before it goes Alpha? ( not these Test Candidates )
---------- Post added at 06:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:55 PM ----------
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=266869
|

2nd August 2011, 11:16 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,549

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
Hi
The last update from him is the one that we all have now. Like I said, any further discussions will happen publicly and you can get to know about it along with the rest of us. AdamW or me don't know more than you on what will be decided.
__________________
Rahul
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram
|

2nd August 2011, 11:22 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
ok thanks Rahul .
|

2nd August 2011, 08:28 PM
|
 |
Fedora QA Community Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,762

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
I believe the last thing I read (which was indeed on -devel, I think) is that this is dependent on a working fsck for btrfs being available in time, and that was considered quite unlikely to happen, so it's likely this would be pushed to F17.
|

3rd August 2011, 12:09 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamW
I believe the last thing I read (which was indeed on -devel, I think) is that this is dependent on a working fsck for btrfs being available in time, and that was considered quite unlikely to happen, so it's likely this would be pushed to F17.
|
thats what i thought as Josef mentioned that on his last post last month in devel list about it.
---------- Post added at 09:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:08 AM ----------
i haad to ask as the feature hasnt been removed from F16 Feature list so i thought it might have been still on track for f16
|

3rd August 2011, 06:55 AM
|
 |
Fedora QA Community Monkey
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,762

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
detox: it wouldn't be removed until FESCo makes a final decision one way or the other.
|

3rd August 2011, 07:14 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamW
detox: it wouldn't be removed until FESCo makes a final decision one way or the other.
|
ohh ok, any idea when there might be another Fesco meeting whether BTRFS makes default?
i guess untill they hear more from Josef?
|

9th August 2011, 04:38 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Out there
Age: 38
Posts: 90

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
I thought I'd update this thread for the sake of completeness. It's decided - btrfs will NOT be the default file system in Fedora 16.
Too bad, but in my opinion, the only sensible choice in the current situation.
Here is the source of this information (fedora-devel list).
|

10th August 2011, 12:48 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
Re: BTRFS and F16
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightDot
I thought I'd update this thread for the sake of completeness. It's decided - btrfs will NOT be the default file system in Fedora 16.
Too bad, but in my opinion, the only sensible choice in the current situation.
Here is the source of this information (fedora-devel list).
|
i actually did post this in the " release schedule ' thread i made about F16 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=262991
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 17:44 (Tuesday, 21-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|