F15: Nautilus is being naughty ... 100% CPU usage

[twohot]

I can't use Nautilus for up to 2mins without hitting 100%+ CPU usage. This happens with a right-click event, or copy event and usually within 'Downloads' folder. Is this a known issue?

[chdongsh]

I never meet this problem

[twohot]

Interesting

I erased/removed nautilus and reinstalled it. Some vital packages went away as dependencies e.g. deja-dup, evince-nautilus, totem-nautilus, file-roller-nautilus. Attempting to reinstall those give me errors:

Error: Protected multilib versions: 1:totem-2.91.92-1.fc15.i686 != 1:totem-2.91.93-1.fc15.x86_64
Error: Protected multilib versions: openldap-2.4.23-9.fc15.i686 != openldap-2.4.24-2.fc15.x86_64
Error: Protected multilib versions: libpeas-0.7.4-1.fc15.i686 != libpeas-0.9.0-1.fc15.x86_64

---------- Post added at 10:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:50 AM ----------

Even then I still get 100% CPU usage running nautilus without the extra packages. This is definitely a bug

Originally Posted by twohot

I can't use Nautilus for up to 2mins without hitting 100%+ CPU usage. This happens with a right-click event, or copy event and usually within 'Downloads' folder. Is this a known issue?

i cant reproduce your problem either

[twohot]

Originally Posted by detox

i cant reproduce your problem either

Then something is uniquely wrong ... looks like a case of total re-installation. I've had F15 from Alpha stage (been updating from fedora, fedora-testing and rpmfusion rawhide repos). I think its time to consider F15 BETA as a starting point.

[DBelton]

when you go to re-install the dependencies that got removed, try disabling the updates-testing repo and see what happens. Those 3 packages that give you an error, the later package is sitting in updates-testing, so by disabling that repo, you may be able to install, then enable updates-testing and update..

Also, are you using packagekit to try and install them? There is a bug similar to what you describe using packagekit, but they said theirs works using yum.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692453

[twohot]

I have filed a bug at bugzilla for Nautilus Component in Fedora. The Developers need a back-trace. The new problem is that I can't get debuginfo packages for two dependences. Anyone who knows where I can find them is highly appreciated:

Could not find debuginfo for main pkg: libgcc-4.6.0-1.fc15.x86_64
Could not find debuginfo for main pkg: libstdc++-4.6.0-1.fc15.x86_64

[DBelton]

debug packages are in the debug repos.

enable repos updates-debuginfo fedora-debuginfo updates-testing-debuginfo

you can either edit the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora* repo files and set the debuginfo repos to enabled, or just use the enablerepo switch on the yum command line.

Edit:

only enable the updates-testing-debuginfo repo if you have the updates-testing repo enabled as well. You may get mismatched packages if you have one enabled without the other.

[twohot]

Originally Posted by DBelton

debug packages are in the debug repos.

enable repos updates-debuginfo fedora-debuginfo updates-testing-debuginfo

you can either edit the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora* repo files and set the debuginfo repos to enabled, or just use the enablerepo switch on the yum command line.

Edit:

only enable the updates-testing-debuginfo repo if you have the updates-testing repo enabled as well. You may get mismatched packages if you have one enabled without the other.

Both ways i get the errors:
This time one more package has been added.:

Could not find debuginfo for main pkg: adwaita-gtk3-theme-2.91.92.1-1.fc15.x86_64

[DBelton]

Those packages may not have a debuginfo package in the repos. I can't imagine a theme package having a debuginfo package. (I may be and probably am wrong about this.. )

[twohot]

Originally Posted by DBelton

Those packages may not have a debuginfo package in the repos. I can't imagine a theme package having a debuginfo package. (I may be and probably am wrong about this.. )

I guess I have to report that 'wall' to the guys at bugzilla. Unless, someone knows another way to get a backtrace from a naughty Nautilus

[twohot]

Finally the Culprit Emerges! It was a bug alright ... an ugly one.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693061

Nautilus was chewing on source SVG file for Fedora Wallpaper (trying to generate thumbnail). My, that File is huge. Inkscape was having hard time with it too. I didn't realize there could be more.

WARNING: Avoid large SVG files!