 |
 |
 |
 |
| F16 Development This section archived once F16 reached final release. |
17th May 2010, 03:43 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
 
|
|
So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Did that come down from the BP off-shore testing group?
www.kernel.org
$ rpm -qa kernel-PAE
kernel-PAE-2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.33.3-83.fc13.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.33.3-84.fc13.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.34-0.49.rc7.git0.fc14.i686
SJ
__________________
Do the Math
|
18th May 2010, 09:33 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Well, it seems to be working ok.
$ uname -a
Linux Ruthie-07.WinProxy 2.6.34-2.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon May 17 03:51:24 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[darwinhwebb@Ruthie-07 ~]$ rpm -qa kernel\*
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.34-2.fc14.i686
kernel-headers-2.6.34-2.fc14.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.34-0.49.rc7.git0.fc14.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.34-2.fc14.i686
SJ
__________________
Do the Math
|
22nd May 2010, 10:09 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Kernel-PAE-2.6.34-11 stop crashing Gnome/xorg.
So far so ggod.
SJ
__________________
Do the Math
|
26th May 2010, 08:09 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 226
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
2.6.34 has been a champ over here.
|
26th May 2010, 09:49 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 254
 
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Most excellent for me as well.
__________________
F18
|
27th May 2010, 12:04 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,409
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Working well for me as well.
dd_wizard
|
27th May 2010, 12:20 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
A yup +1
Ky
|
1st June 2010, 07:29 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
2.6.34-14 works for nouveau but intel (915=> 865) = no kms drv's found, no screen
vesa works (however f14 intel looks older than f13 intel?)
2.6.34-18 - compiling now looks like a fix.
SJ
---------- Post added at 10:29 AM CDT ---------- Previous post was at 09:51 AM CDT ----------
No change for 18.
nouveau works but gets a kernel crash on Pent III 800
intel crashes kernel, still no kms drv's found.
vesa with xorg.conf init3 startx works as before.
SJ
__________________
Do the Math
|
1st June 2010, 07:39 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
2.6.34-18.fc14.i686.PAE up and running here (not very long yet) seems ok so far.
Ky
|
1st June 2010, 07:52 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyryder
2.6.34-18.fc14.i686.PAE up and running here (not very long yet) seems ok so far.
Ky
|
Are you using xorg-x11-drv-nouveau for a nvidia card?
SJ
__________________
Do the Math
|
1st June 2010, 07:53 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,409
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowJet
2.6.34-14 works for nouveau but intel (915=> 865) = no kms drv's found, no screen
vesa works (however f14 intel looks older than f13 intel?)
|
You're right about that:
Quote:
[gene@Mobile-PC exaile]$ yum list xorg-x11-drv-intel
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves, show-leaves,
: verify
Installed Packages
xorg-x11-drv-intel.x86_64 2.11.0-4.fc13 @/xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.11.0-4.fc13.x86_64/13
Available Packages
xorg-x11-drv-intel.i686 2.10.0-5.fc14 rawhide
|
Kernel 14 works fine on my Intel 945GM graphics, I'm about to try 18.
dd_wizard
|
1st June 2010, 08:02 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dd_wizard
You're right about that:
Kernel 14 works fine on my Intel 945GM graphics, I'm about to try 18.
dd_wizard
|
Yes, 14 was ok for many.
The stange thing I observered was the vesa (on an intel) is much more stable for f13 and CentOS-5.5 running in VBox-320 (They use vesa also.).
I may revert back to 14 and f13 intel drv if they can't figure out the 35 patch stuff. It's too iffy and looks like guess work.
SJ
__________________
Do the Math
|
1st June 2010, 08:06 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowJet
Are you using xorg-x11-drv-nouveau for a nvidia card?
SJ
|
No, I am using intel:
Code:
[kyryder@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa|grep xorg-x11-drv-intel*
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.11.0-4.fc13.i686
Ky
|
1st June 2010, 08:14 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyryder
No, I am using intel:
Code:
[kyryder@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa|grep xorg-x11-drv-intel*
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.11.0-4.fc13.i686
Ky |
You are also using the f13 drv.
What model of intel graphics do you have?
SJ
__________________
Do the Math
|
1st June 2010, 08:15 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
Re: So 2.6.34 is stable, aye?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowJet
You are also using the f13 drv.
What model of intel graphics do you have?
SJ
|
i915GM in laptop
Ky
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Which is more stable?
|
SURESH MENON |
Installation and Live Media |
6 |
4th December 2008 03:04 PM |
|
Is FC3 less stable than FC2?
|
jerrybasham |
EOL (End Of Life) Versions |
23 |
17th March 2005 11:11 PM |
Current GMT-time: 16:29 (Saturday, 18-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
