 |
 |
 |
 |
| Programming & Packaging A place to discuss programming and packaging. |

30th April 2009, 09:17 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 313

|
|
|
How to install CMU Lisp (not the common lisp in fedora repo) on Fedora 10?
Hi everyone,
for my assignment in school I need CMU Lisp installed. It looks like there's a package "clisp," but my teacher told that implementation of common lisp differs slightly from CMU Lisp, so I need CMU Lisp specifically.
I went to CMU Lisp website, but it said that package for Fedora wasn't implemented yet.
I found another RPM package at http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/se...hp?query=cmucl
How do I know if the above RPM needs any dependencies?
Or maybe someone knows any other clever ways to install CMU Lisp on Fedora? I have F10 64-bit.
Thank you!
|

1st May 2009, 04:36 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,619

|
|
Code:
yum install cmucl cmucl-extras
|

1st May 2009, 05:35 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 313

|
|
Thanks, RupertPupkin, for your reply, but apparently there are no such packages in Fedora repo. I also have RPM Fusion installed and neither one of the packages is available:-(
Code:
[root@localhost ~]# yum install cmucl cmucl-extras
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirrors.tummy.com
* fedora: mirror.stanford.edu
* rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.web-ster.com
* rpmfusion-free: mirror.web-ster.com
* updates: mirror.stanford.edu
* rpmfusion-nonfree: mirrors.tummy.com
* fusion: mirror.thegamingkid.com
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package cmucl available.
No package cmucl-extras available.
Nothing to do
[root@localhost ~]#
Should I install some other repository for those two packages?
|

1st May 2009, 05:45 AM
|
 |
Banned (for/from) behaving just like everybody else!
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 1,307

|
|
|
The CMUCL packages are in the repo indeed.. I can confirm it.
Can you try flusing the YUM cache and try again?
yum clean all
yum install cmucl cmucl-extras
__________________
I believe in nerditarianism. I read FedoraForum for the Fedora-related posts.
|

1st May 2009, 05:49 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 313

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aleph
The CMUCL packages are in the repo indeed.. I can confirm it.
Can you try flusing the YUM cache and try again?
yum clean all
yum install cmucl cmucl-extras
|
I just cleaned the yum cache => same result, no such packages. Do you think that "yum-fastestmirror" plugin could mess things up? Or maybe it's because I'm using Fedora 64-bit, but I should still see all 32-bit packages, right?
Last edited by premudriy; 1st May 2009 at 05:57 AM.
|

1st May 2009, 05:52 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 313

|
|
|
One of my classmates is also on the same project and he doesn't have these two packages either. He also uses F10 64-bit.
I also uninstalled "yum-fastestmirror" just now. Flushed yum cache again and still can't get those packages.
|

1st May 2009, 06:02 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,619

|
|
They're in the F7 i386 repository: http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pu...386/os/Fedora/
You could try installing those RPMs (cmucl-19d-3.fc7.i386.rpm, cmucl-extras-19d-3.fc7.i386.rpm).
Worst case, just grab the source and compile it.
|

1st May 2009, 06:03 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 313

|
|
|
I just called another friend who has Fedora 10 32-bit and he said that he has cmucl in repo. How come my 64-bit Fedora can't find it ?
|

1st May 2009, 06:06 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 313

|
|
|
Do you think that my repo URL is messed up? Can I just put Fedora 32-bit repo URL temporarily and install from there or will it mess things up?
|

1st May 2009, 06:12 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 8,302

|
|
|
I beleive there are some in the koji repo for F11 and others in freshrpms.
Personally I'd just install from source - looks easy.
|

1st May 2009, 06:16 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 313

|
|
|
Okay, thanks a lot, guys! I'll go ahead and try to install from source.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 13:01 (Friday, 24-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|