Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > The Dungeon > Archived (Click Header To See Sub-Forums) > Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 11 Only)
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 11 Only) Post Development Version comments and questions that don't belong in Bugzilla here. These posts will be moved or deleted once the Final version is released

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th April 2009, 01:46 PM
stefan1975's Avatar
stefan1975 Offline
"Stefan the converted" -- forum Macintosh® Glee Club leader
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 127.0.0.1
Age: 38
Posts: 1,247
rawhide repo broken today?

is it just me or is rawhide kind of broken? I cannot update or install from it:

Code:
[root@localhost ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
rawhide/metalink                                         | 8.1 kB     00:01
rawhide                                                  | 3.8 kB     00:00
http://ftp.tudelft.nl/download.fedora.redhat.com/linux/development/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for rawhide
Trying other mirror.
rawhide                                                  | 3.8 kB     00:00
http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for rawhide
Trying other mirror.
rawhide                                                  | 3.8 kB     00:00
ftp://ftp.SURFnet.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for rawhide
Trying other mirror.
rawhide
s..
__________________
"$ su - bofh"
OS: Mac OSX Snow Leopard (x64 by default), W7_Enterprise_X64, F12_x64_KDE
Hardware: late 2009 Macbook 13", MSI Wind 10"
Browser: Opera 10.10, Safari 4
Registered linux user #459910
  #2  
Old 18th April 2009, 06:50 PM
drag Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4
Ya. Same exact problem for me.

Effectively has removed the ability for me to upgrade or install software..

~$ rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
fedora-release-10.92-1.noarch
  #3  
Old 18th April 2009, 10:03 PM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
Hrrm, no mention that I see on the testing list.

Seems to be a metalink issue, which happens from time to time. Comment out the metalink line and try.

That worked for me.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu

Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.


"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
  #4  
Old 18th April 2009, 10:47 PM
stefan1975's Avatar
stefan1975 Offline
"Stefan the converted" -- forum Macintosh® Glee Club leader
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 127.0.0.1
Age: 38
Posts: 1,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottro View Post
Hrrm, no mention that I see on the testing list.

Seems to be a metalink issue, which happens from time to time. Comment out the metalink line and try.

That worked for me.
jup...that helped. thx. still odd though.
__________________
"$ su - bofh"
OS: Mac OSX Snow Leopard (x64 by default), W7_Enterprise_X64, F12_x64_KDE
Hardware: late 2009 Macbook 13", MSI Wind 10"
Browser: Opera 10.10, Safari 4
Registered linux user #459910
  #5  
Old 19th April 2009, 12:20 AM
jonathan47 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 84
I have the same problem. I'm not sure I've identified the "metalink line" that needs to be commented out. I'm assuming that line is in the fedora-rawhide.repo file under [rawhide]. If I'm on the right track, do you mean the 2nd line in the following:

#baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/os/
mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=$basearch

Thank you!

Last edited by jonathan47; 19th April 2009 at 12:23 AM.
  #6  
Old 19th April 2009, 12:28 AM
Demz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
last i knew about it, i think presto rpms couldnt be made. something like that so they werent pushing out updates.
  #7  
Old 19th April 2009, 01:16 AM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
That was yesterday, or two days ago, I think. Sound right?
I didn't see any mention of it today, I don't think, but if Demz says he saw it (Today), I'd trust him over me.



There's now been some mention of it on the list, and apparently, the main fix is to simply force it to use the base repo rather than mirrors.

One of those things that I imagine will be cleared up shortly.

Presto seems to be working for me. When I forced it to use the base rather than a mirror, it downloaded several deltas, which have a .drpm suffix. It then built them, which takes a wee bit of time, at least on the underpowered netbook--but only a wee bit, probably about as long as it would have taken to download the full versions of the rpms, then it got the rest, and installed.

Then, I got that satisfying little message how it had downloaded something like 30 MB instead of 64 and there was a savings of 50 something percent.

So, seems to be good.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu

Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.


"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
  #8  
Old 19th April 2009, 01:32 AM
Demz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottro View Post
That was yesterday, or two days ago, I think. Sound right?
I didn't see any mention of it today, I don't think, but if Demz says he saw it (Today), I'd trust him over me.



There's now been some mention of it on the list, and apparently, the main fix is to simply force it to use the base repo rather than mirrors.

One of those things that I imagine will be cleared up shortly.

Presto seems to be working for me. When I forced it to use the base rather than a mirror, it downloaded several deltas, which have a .drpm suffix. It then built them, which takes a wee bit of time, at least on the underpowered netbook--but only a wee bit, probably about as long as it would have taken to download the full versions of the rpms, then it got the rest, and installed.

Then, I got that satisfying little message how it had downloaded something like 30 MB instead of 64 and there was a savings of 50 something percent.

So, seems to be good.
i did see it mentioned on the test-list the other day but there has been no mention of it being fixed so i assume that its still having problems
  #9  
Old 19th April 2009, 02:17 AM
jonathan47 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 84
Thanks for everyone's help. I activated the base and commented mirrors out. It works.
 

Tags
broken, rawhide, repo, today

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rawhide today's repo rpms unsigned, nokey SlowJet Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 11 Only) 5 7th May 2009 07:59 AM
Anyone Elses Rawhide K.O today? Jake Fedora Focus 3 8th January 2009 01:59 AM
Help, yum broken after upgrade to FC10 today CreepyCrawler61 Using Fedora 10 5th December 2008 06:36 PM
Fedora 10 Rawhide install w rpmfusion repo, can't get Xine working attilahooper Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 10 Only) 9 5th November 2008 03:21 AM
Is the kernel 2.6.27.3 in rawhide repo GEM enabled TheIcebreaker Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 10 Only) 2 26th October 2008 01:07 PM


Current GMT-time: 18:49 (Wednesday, 22-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat