 |
 |
 |
 |
| Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 11 Only) Post Development Version comments and questions that don't belong in Bugzilla here. These posts will be moved or deleted once the Final version is released |

18th April 2009, 01:46 PM
|
 |
"Stefan the converted" -- forum Macintosh® Glee Club leader
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 127.0.0.1
Age: 38
Posts: 1,247

|
|
|
rawhide repo broken today?
is it just me or is rawhide kind of broken? I cannot update or install from it:
Code:
[root@localhost ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
rawhide/metalink | 8.1 kB 00:01
rawhide | 3.8 kB 00:00
http://ftp.tudelft.nl/download.fedora.redhat.com/linux/development/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for rawhide
Trying other mirror.
rawhide | 3.8 kB 00:00
http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for rawhide
Trying other mirror.
rawhide | 3.8 kB 00:00
ftp://ftp.SURFnet.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for rawhide
Trying other mirror.
rawhide
s..
__________________
"$ su - bofh"
OS: Mac OSX Snow Leopard (x64 by default), W7_Enterprise_X64, F12_x64_KDE
Hardware: late 2009 Macbook 13", MSI Wind 10"
Browser: Opera 10.10, Safari 4
Registered linux user #459910
|

18th April 2009, 06:50 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4

|
|
|
Ya. Same exact problem for me.
Effectively has removed the ability for me to upgrade or install software..
~$ rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
fedora-release-10.92-1.noarch
|

18th April 2009, 10:03 PM
|
 |
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142

|
|
|
Hrrm, no mention that I see on the testing list.
Seems to be a metalink issue, which happens from time to time. Comment out the metalink line and try.
That worked for me.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu
Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.
"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
|

18th April 2009, 10:47 PM
|
 |
"Stefan the converted" -- forum Macintosh® Glee Club leader
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 127.0.0.1
Age: 38
Posts: 1,247

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottro
Hrrm, no mention that I see on the testing list.
Seems to be a metalink issue, which happens from time to time. Comment out the metalink line and try.
That worked for me.
|
jup...that helped. thx. still odd though.
__________________
"$ su - bofh"
OS: Mac OSX Snow Leopard (x64 by default), W7_Enterprise_X64, F12_x64_KDE
Hardware: late 2009 Macbook 13", MSI Wind 10"
Browser: Opera 10.10, Safari 4
Registered linux user #459910
|

19th April 2009, 12:20 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 84

|
|
|
I have the same problem. I'm not sure I've identified the "metalink line" that needs to be commented out. I'm assuming that line is in the fedora-rawhide.repo file under [rawhide]. If I'm on the right track, do you mean the 2nd line in the following:
#baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/os/
mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=$basearch
Thank you!
Last edited by jonathan47; 19th April 2009 at 12:23 AM.
|

19th April 2009, 12:28 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
last i knew about it, i think presto rpms couldnt be made. something like that so they werent pushing out updates.
|

19th April 2009, 01:16 AM
|
 |
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142

|
|
That was yesterday, or two days ago, I think. Sound right?
I didn't see any mention of it today, I don't think, but if Demz says he saw it (Today), I'd trust him over me.
There's now been some mention of it on the list, and apparently, the main fix is to simply force it to use the base repo rather than mirrors.
One of those things that I imagine will be cleared up shortly.
Presto seems to be working for me. When I forced it to use the base rather than a mirror, it downloaded several deltas, which have a .drpm suffix. It then built them, which takes a wee bit of time, at least on the underpowered netbook--but only a wee bit, probably about as long as it would have taken to download the full versions of the rpms, then it got the rest, and installed.
Then, I got that satisfying little message how it had downloaded something like 30 MB instead of 64 and there was a savings of 50 something percent.
So, seems to be good.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu
Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.
"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
|

19th April 2009, 01:32 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottro
That was yesterday, or two days ago, I think. Sound right?
I didn't see any mention of it today, I don't think, but if Demz says he saw it (Today), I'd trust him over me.
There's now been some mention of it on the list, and apparently, the main fix is to simply force it to use the base repo rather than mirrors.
One of those things that I imagine will be cleared up shortly.
Presto seems to be working for me. When I forced it to use the base rather than a mirror, it downloaded several deltas, which have a .drpm suffix. It then built them, which takes a wee bit of time, at least on the underpowered netbook--but only a wee bit, probably about as long as it would have taken to download the full versions of the rpms, then it got the rest, and installed.
Then, I got that satisfying little message how it had downloaded something like 30 MB instead of 64 and there was a savings of 50 something percent.
So, seems to be good.
|
i did see it mentioned on the test-list the other day but there has been no mention of it being fixed so i assume that its still having problems
|

19th April 2009, 02:17 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 84

|
|
|
Thanks for everyone's help. I activated the base and commented mirrors out. It works.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 18:49 (Wednesday, 22-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|