Amarok 2.1 Beta & Qtscript-binding

[CraigWatson]

I currently have Amarok 2.1 Beta ready to try out, and I've hit the final snag.

I have all of the devel packages I need installed, I have downloaded, compiled and generated the QtScript packages, but I need to tell the Amarok CMake where to find them, as they have been compiled in a folder on my desktop

[root@khashoggi script]# ls
libqtscript_core.so        libqtscript_network.so.1      libqtscript_phonon.so.1.0    libqtscript_svg.so.1.0.0      libqtscript_xmlpatterns.so
libqtscript_core.so.1      libqtscript_network.so.1.0    libqtscript_phonon.so.1.0.0  libqtscript_uitools.so        libqtscript_xmlpatterns.so.1
libqtscript_core.so.1.0    libqtscript_network.so.1.0.0  libqtscript_sql.so           libqtscript_uitools.so.1      libqtscript_xmlpatterns.so.1.0
libqtscript_core.so.1.0.0  libqtscript_opengl.so         libqtscript_sql.so.1         libqtscript_uitools.so.1.0    libqtscript_xmlpatterns.so.1.0.0
libqtscript_gui.so         libqtscript_opengl.so.1       libqtscript_sql.so.1.0       libqtscript_uitools.so.1.0.0  libqtscript_xml.so
libqtscript_gui.so.1       libqtscript_opengl.so.1.0     libqtscript_sql.so.1.0.0     libqtscript_webkit.so         libqtscript_xml.so.1
libqtscript_gui.so.1.0     libqtscript_opengl.so.1.0.0   libqtscript_svg.so           libqtscript_webkit.so.1       libqtscript_xml.so.1.0
libqtscript_gui.so.1.0.0   libqtscript_phonon.so         libqtscript_svg.so.1         libqtscript_webkit.so.1.0     libqtscript_xml.so.1.0.0
libqtscript_network.so     libqtscript_phonon.so.1       libqtscript_svg.so.1.0       libqtscript_webkit.so.1.0.0

Is there a folder I need to move these into?

[CraigWatson]

D'oh! Found it:

/usr/lib[64]/qt4/plugins/script

[rdieter]

Or just install qtscriptgenerator (or qtscriptbindings) from updates-testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda...DORA-2009-3432

[temporalmaniac]

I've tried compiling, both with the in-repo package and with compile-and-copied bindings, but it's still not finding it. Am I completely overlooking something?

[temporalmaniac]

Nevermind, I managed to get it. I did an 'rm -rf amarok-2.0.96', then re-extracted the tarball. Now it works! (I have yet to get the version of libgpod that it wants, though.) While I have no problems that such an action works, I fail to understand why it should work, unless there was an error in the previous extraction process.

[rdieter]

Pre-built (post) beta2 versions are coming to updates-testing:
F10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda....20090518.fc10
F11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda....20090518.fc11