 |
 |
 |
 |
| Please pardon our dust A thread in which to constructively make observations, offer feedback, make suggestions and provide assessments specifically about new and recent changes to the fedora forum. |

11th April 2009, 04:02 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottro
Maybe the same reason I do.  If I'm googling for something, I go to google. I type in whatever ['m googling and open promising pages in adjacent tabs. Or, hit ctl+t and open a tab and google.
However, if I'm searching the forums, I start with the forum search--if I have no joy, then I don't have to go to google or bugzilla anymore, because it's there.
At any rate, I think I'd have to say, "Whatever." If you don't like it or you prefer your firefox addon, use that, but I, at least, find it convenient.
I can't believe we've had 30 posts on this thing.
Not saying your way is bad, just that *I* find this more convenient.
|
its more convienent for the "lazy "
|

12th April 2009, 01:10 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
i see the Bugzilla one removed? how come
|

13th April 2009, 11:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 4,168

|
|
|
I don't see the Bugzilla search thingy. Only Fedora Forum Search and Google Search thingy.
|

13th April 2009, 11:07 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: /dev/realm/{Abba,Carpenters,...stage}
Posts: 3,286

|
|
|
It has been removed. Permanently it seems.
|

15th April 2009, 11:56 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne
Age: 41
Posts: 528

|
|
|
I think it would make life much easier if members asked questions (that is the title of the post) in a careful and considerate way.
A lot of threads that contain helpful information are often hidden away because the title of the thread was poorly written.
Maybe threads with helpful posts should be rewritten in the interest of the forum. I don't know if this can be done due to posting restrictions.
When i start a thread i try to make it informative so that it is easy to locate for anyone doing a search.
Nobody should have to reinvent the wheel.
Lazy questions that lack effective description are a big time waster and for me are deeply annoying. Isn't it better to contribute something positive to the community at large?
I think the forum guidelines should encourage this kind of approach.
Last edited by jonathonp; 15th April 2009 at 11:59 AM.
|

15th April 2009, 12:11 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Euregio
Posts: 3,613

|
|
Hi johnnylinux,
I agree with you. And basically the Howto Forum was made for this. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=12
If you find certain posts especially helpful to the community, the idea is, that you contribute by rewriting them as a howto or guide. I am sure nobody is going to object it, especially if you link back to the original thread!
Ilja
|

15th April 2009, 02:03 PM
|
 |
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142

|
|
|
Actually, the forum guidelines do suggest using helpful titles. Much of time, I find myself changing titles of a thread--especially the ones that read something like help, wireless help, can't connect and other vague titles.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu
Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.
"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
|

15th April 2009, 04:44 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 1,013

|
|
|
Glad you added the extra search engine.
Today, however, I got a rude surprise. When I was searching for posts on DNSSEC, it complained about posting more than one search a minute. Come on guys - get real.
If a search returns 0 entries (or even some arbitrarily low number of entries like say under 5 or 10) it can be pretty obvious that you need to change the terms of your search or that the results from the titles you scan weren't what you wanted. It doesn't take minute to take a word out of a search query and waiting a minute to hit search again is crazy!
|

16th April 2009, 12:06 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by William Haller
Glad you added the extra search engine.
Today, however, I got a rude surprise. When I was searching for posts on DNSSEC, it complained about posting more than one search a minute. Come on guys - get real.
If a search returns 0 entries (or even some arbitrarily low number of entries like say under 5 or 10) it can be pretty obvious that you need to change the terms of your search or that the results from the titles you scan weren't what you wanted. It doesn't take minute to take a word out of a search query and waiting a minute to hit search again is crazy!
|
im gathering you used the inbuilt vbulletin Search?
|

16th April 2009, 03:19 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: England, Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,576

|
|
vB default search works fine for me.. but maybe that's because I know how to use it
Anywho as for these other ones, I cannot use them
reason: I block all of google's nasty scripts which allow them to spy on me.
__________________
Fedora user since FC6.
Linux user since 2003.
Registered Linux ID: #456478
OS: Fedora 16 x86_64
|

16th April 2009, 04:37 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 1,013

|
|
|
@Demz
Yes, I was using the old default search engine in normal mode as opposed to advanced search. I see that it's now 30 seconds (or maybe it varies with the load on the server). Regardless, it still seems unreasonable. There are just too many reasons when you might have spelled something wrong or were just too specific and got 0 or too few results to have to wait to reenter a search.
|

16th April 2009, 04:50 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
i think leigh123@linux should be able to fix that up , but i would recommend you use google, its better than the default search embeded into the forum
|

16th April 2009, 11:39 AM
|
 |
Retired Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,509

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by William Haller
@Demz
Yes, I was using the old default search engine in normal mode as opposed to advanced search. I see that it's now 30 seconds (or maybe it varies with the load on the server). Regardless, it still seems unreasonable. There are just too many reasons when you might have spelled something wrong or were just too specific and got 0 or too few results to have to wait to reenter a search.
|
Searches put a large load on the server so it is reasonable to limit them, 60 seconds seems to be default for most forums.
I wont reduce it further, FYI the other engine that I added has no restriction and is quicker ( + zero server load for the forum ).
Quote:
|
There are just too many reasons when you might have spelled something wrong or were just too specific and got 0 or too few results to have to wait to reenter a search.
|
Tough, it isn't my problem if people can't use a search engine properly.
__________________
My Hardware
- CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 Hex Core 1055T 95W Edition @3.5Ghz
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
- Cooler: Corsair H50 CPU Cooler
- RAM: Corsair Dominator 8GB (4x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz
- Graphics: Gigabyte GeForce GTS 450 OC 1024MB GDDR5
|

16th April 2009, 11:49 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
pretty obvious that google search is quicker + zero server load for the forum
|

16th April 2009, 02:47 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 52
Posts: 1,013

|
|
|
Well. I erased my first reply, which was probably a good thing.
If searches are such a problem for you and put such a load on your servers and Google is load-free, then why is the forum search engine still available?
I still stand by my original statement. If you have to limit by time, then having to wait a minute when your search query fails to deliver is not helping your user base. A search for DNSSEC which gives one thread about dynamic DNS (and now this thread) but which prevents any query for the next minute is just wrong.
You can take a "that's tough" attitude, but it makes the forum much less useful and irritating for people who are using it to solve work problems and don't have unlimited minutes to spend waiting to try a different search.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 20:04 (Saturday, 18-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|