Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 15th March 2009, 03:51 AM
Natilatux's Avatar
Natilatux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: at my computer
Posts: 13
Thumbs up Eee PC 1000HE - Fedora 10

I'm currently typing this from an Asus Eee PC 1000HE running Fedora 10 off a LiveCD. EVERYTHING needed to run works so perfectly! The wi-fi not only works, it's near-instant to connect to our linksys router. The webcam works great, and the default background, which is my favorite default I've ever seen, looks stunning with the rest of the operating system on the high-density screen.

In regards to the special keys, Num lock, volume controls, and screen brightness all work, however the other special keys (which I find quite useless) (wifi kill, etc.) don't work. --

--whoops, while testing various keys I hit the "sleep" button which apparently doesn't work on a LiveCD...duh.

Anyways, I'm astounded at how well this works. If you plan on putting a binary distro on the 1000HE and want something other than Ubuntu, Fedora is most definitely the way to go.
__________________
Once upon a kernel warring, with some hardware myself deploring;
When I clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning,
And my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear fedor'.
"'Tis not possible!" I uttered, "Give me back my forums of lore!"
Quoth the server: 404.
Linux user #487045
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th March 2009, 05:20 AM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
I've been running F11 on it with almost no issues. I haven't tested some things (I tend to not use function keys), and I've been running a fairly minimal install using fluxbox as WM.

But yes, wireless worked out of the box, which is always the most important thing for me.
Even allowing for my prejudices, I have found that so far, a minimal F10 works better than a minimal (from the install CD) Ubuntu jaunty. (I figure it's fair, because they're both alpha.)

Sound works too, but on a netbook, I don't care that much about sound, it's main use is access my server/workstation, or if on call and far away, to access my work's VPN. (We have a Cisco VPN so vpnc works quite well for that..

Ubuntu's done a lot more work on netbooks, and there's also the eeebuntu and easypeasey, but
I've found Fedora to work just as well. This included setting my router to only accept N wireless connections.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu

Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.


"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15th March 2009, 05:51 AM
Natilatux's Avatar
Natilatux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: at my computer
Posts: 13
Great! It's nice to know that good results aren't few and far between with what I hope to be my favourite OS!

My main reason for the thread was to give any curious passers-by who have a 1000HE the knowledge that Fedora would run great on their machine.
__________________
Once upon a kernel warring, with some hardware myself deploring;
When I clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning,
And my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear fedor'.
"'Tis not possible!" I uttered, "Give me back my forums of lore!"
Quoth the server: 404.
Linux user #487045
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th March 2009, 05:59 AM
z.kevino Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
thanks for the info. A few questions, if you don't mind. I just purchased my 1000HE:


(1) can you install Fedora (10 or 11alpha) from normal Fedora install DVD ? or must you do it from live distro?

(2) can you install the x86_64 or must you choose the i386 version?

(3) i would like to dual boot with the XP, so can I just use a tool like partition magic, to adjust the factory partitions, to make room for the Fedora?

(4) other than alpha, any reason I shouldn't install Fedora 11 on the eeepc 1000HE?

thanks for all of your help - this was my first post to this site, and my first hour with the eeepc
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th March 2009, 05:07 AM
Natilatux's Avatar
Natilatux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: at my computer
Posts: 13
(1) Yes, you can install from the DVD.

(2) I think both are compatible.

(3) I haven't looked too deeply into this, but that should work. I think anaconda (fedora installer) has it's own partitioner which you might be able to use instead.

(4) As scottro said, he's been using F11 without any problems.

Have fun with your awesome netbook!
__________________
Once upon a kernel warring, with some hardware myself deploring;
When I clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning,
And my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear fedor'.
"'Tis not possible!" I uttered, "Give me back my forums of lore!"
Quoth the server: 404.
Linux user #487045
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th March 2009, 05:10 AM
Natilatux's Avatar
Natilatux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: at my computer
Posts: 13
Oh, I also tested a bit more, the audio out jack doesn't work on the LiveCD. The audio in I haven't tested yet.

Scottro, I'm sorry I didn't notice your similar post before I posted this.
__________________
Once upon a kernel warring, with some hardware myself deploring;
When I clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning,
And my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear fedor'.
"'Tis not possible!" I uttered, "Give me back my forums of lore!"
Quoth the server: 404.
Linux user #487045
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20th March 2009, 05:16 AM
z.kevino Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
thanks,

as a side note, when I tried to run a live CD that was 64 bit, I got an error that the kernel wouldn't run, and that I had to get an i686 version. So, I didn't try with 64 bit install, but rather the i386 dvd.


I was able to install from i386 dvd, but only after deleting the D: drive partition, because even if you shrink the D: drive, as delivered, there are already 4 primary partitions on the harddrive.

I chose to use partition magic, and delete D:, make C: a bit larger, then boot from Fedora 11 alpha (i386) and installed it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20th March 2009, 05:30 AM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
Nautilux, not at all, it frequently happens, and each viewpoint is a good thing. @z.kevino, no, it's a 32 bit system, as you found out. I know there are supposed to be some changes in the next generation of Atom processors, but have no idea if they will or won't support 64 bit--I suspect a quick google would give the answer, but I should be asleep.

I didn't try F10 on it, but if it has the ath9k driver, wireless, at least should work. I'm finding that most of the Function keys don't work, but I seldom use any of them anyway, so have done NO research on trying to fix that.
I don't have an external DVD drive, so I just used livecd-to-usb or whatever it's called (as per sideways' tutorial--it's a sticky somewhere, possibly in the installation section). However, rather than following his complete instructions, I just wrote the boot.iso image to a USB and installed via network installation, using NFS.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu

Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.


"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20th March 2009, 01:20 PM
z.kevino Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottro View Post
I've been running F11 on it with almost no issues.
i think i'll give it a few more hours before i install fedora 10. I haven't any luck with 11 and wired DCHP, and for some reason, I can't get the wireless (WPA2) to connect (although it sees my SSID).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20th March 2009, 01:50 PM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
I didn't use NM. Don't know if that makes a difference. I did a fairly minimal installation, then upgraded before trying wireless, which I did from command line (after making sure NetworkManager, .i.e., NM, wasn't running. Also, even if one stops NM after booting, it leaves a wpa_supplicant process running which also has to be stopped. (Frankly, I've always found that even if I stop NM, and then stop wpa_supplicant, it doesn't seem to work properly--I then have to reboot, with NM turned off at boot, but this isn't something I've researched at all, it just seems to be the way it is. )
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu

Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.


"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21st March 2009, 05:27 AM
z.kevino Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
update: i got the wireless working, but after a yum update my xwindows wouldn't work right - display only showed up on keypresses and button clicks, so I gave up and started installing 10...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22nd March 2009, 09:55 AM
Multanimous Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
Sorry, I'm a relative newbie to Fedora and Linux.

I ran a live-install on my 1000HE, but could never get the webcam or "special four" keys to work. I even reinstalled using the installation DVD, only to find the same results. I tested the DVD, and there were no problems with it.

My point is, if two computers are of the same model, and both supposedly have the same operating system run on them, what causes the difference of what works what doesn't? If its any help, I believe my BIOS is the 601 version, or the one before it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22nd March 2009, 03:01 PM
z.kevino Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
OK, so I installed Fedora 10, with no problems. Now, i've been reading the incredibly lard thread on getting Fedora 10 on the other models of eeepc
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=206114
and wonder if the synaptic drivers must be fixed like they specify? it seems the hal is not finding the touchpad.
have any of you gotten this to work, or should I start a new thread, rather than hijack this one?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22nd March 2009, 04:56 PM
Natilatux's Avatar
Natilatux Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: at my computer
Posts: 13
If you're touchpad isn't being sensed, you might want to try the fixes they specify. If it breaks anything, it's not like reinstalling is too hard.

While I certainly don't mind you posting here, you might be better off starting a new thread, just so it's easier for others to find your questions.

EDIT: There's a reason why F11 is in "Alpha".
__________________
Once upon a kernel warring, with some hardware myself deploring;
When I clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning,
And my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear fedor'.
"'Tis not possible!" I uttered, "Give me back my forums of lore!"
Quoth the server: 404.
Linux user #487045
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22nd March 2009, 07:34 PM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
@Multanimous. PLEASE DO NOT delete a post because you've solved the problem. Post back about how you solved the problem. Many people will no doubt have the same issue and be grateful for having the solution there.
__________________
--
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu

Do NOT PM forum members with requests for technical support. Ask your questions on the forum.


"I don't know why there is the constant push to break any semblance of compatibility" --anon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1000he, asus, eeepc, fedora 10, fedora 11 alpha

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
eeepc 1000HE fonts? kernel_klink Hardware & Laptops 4 18th October 2009 02:04 PM
fedora 11 KDE : force windows to fit 1024x600 eeepc 1000he screen? udutronik Hardware & Laptops 1 5th October 2009 11:52 PM
Asus 1000HE scottro Hardware & Laptops 24 23rd July 2009 06:01 PM


Current GMT-time: 16:47 (Monday, 20-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat