Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 13th February 2009, 04:34 PM
marvin_ita Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 248
Question xorg-fglrx or kmod-fglrx?

I'm changing my video card from nvidia to ati. I uninstalled the kmod-nvidia proprietary drivers and I want to install AMD proprietary drivers.
But when I search in repos (rpmfusion) I find that there are kmod-fglrx and xorg-x11-drv-fglrx: what's the difference, since they're the same driver version?
I think it's better to install the xorg ones, that are kernel independent... am I wrong?

Thanks.
Mattia
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13th February 2009, 05:32 PM
leigh123linux's Avatar
leigh123linux Offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,509
kmod-fglrx = just a kernel module for fglrx

xorg-x11-drv-fglrx & xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-libs = driver package

You need all three packages.
__________________
My Hardware
- CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 Hex Core 1055T 95W Edition @3.5Ghz
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
- Cooler: Corsair H50 CPU Cooler
- RAM: Corsair Dominator 8GB (4x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz
- Graphics: Gigabyte GeForce GTS 450 OC 1024MB GDDR5
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13th February 2009, 06:54 PM
marvin_ita Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 248
Oh, I see... I thought that the xorg-x11-drv-fglrx was a stand alone package like xorg-x11-drv-ati...

Thanks for the clarification.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th February 2009, 09:34 PM
AdamW's Avatar
AdamW Offline
Fedora QA Community Monkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,765
The difference is that most drivers don't have kernel components to them. Only really the NVIDIA and ATI proprietary drivers do. So only they need to have extra packages containing the kernel bits.
__________________
Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13th February 2009, 09:48 PM
leigh123linux's Avatar
leigh123linux Offline
Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamW View Post
The difference is that most drivers don't have kernel components to them. Only really the NVIDIA and ATI proprietary drivers do. So only they need to have extra packages containing the kernel bits.
Not true, you have forgotten about drm


Code:
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i810/i810.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i830/i830.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/mga/mga.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/r128/r128.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/savage/savage.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/sis/sis.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/tdfx/tdfx.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.29-0.6.rc3.fc10.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via.ko
__________________
My Hardware
- CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 Hex Core 1055T 95W Edition @3.5Ghz
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H
- Cooler: Corsair H50 CPU Cooler
- RAM: Corsair Dominator 8GB (4x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz
- Graphics: Gigabyte GeForce GTS 450 OC 1024MB GDDR5
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th February 2009, 01:01 AM
AdamW's Avatar
AdamW Offline
Fedora QA Community Monkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,765
I didn't forget, I was just trying to gloss over that bit so the point looked nice and simple .

But those are actually shipped as part of the kernel, not part of the drivers. This is a bit of a weird way of doing things, though. Still, it's an odd area, because the DRM stuff and the driver stuff is really quite separated. I know the openchrome developers say "we don't work on the DRM stuff or even really know much about it" when you ask them anything about 3D issues.
__________________
Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
kmodfglrx, xorgfglrx

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How I can downgrade the kmod-fglrx xorg-x11-drv-fglrx? PashaP Using Fedora 3 22nd June 2008 10:06 PM
kmod-fglrx & kmod-ntfs modules for 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6.stk16 kernel sideways Using Fedora 1 18th January 2007 10:10 AM
kmod-fglrx & kmod-ntfs modules for 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6.stk16 kernel sideways Using Fedora 2 18th January 2007 05:30 AM
kmod-fglrx-smp and xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-8.28.8-1.lvn5 Xorg log file questions ThunderFox Hardware & Laptops 1 5th October 2006 09:11 PM


Current GMT-time: 00:40 (Thursday, 23-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat