Hi, I just installed Fedora 10 i686 and I installed grace from through yum. The fonts don't look right though, they are being drawn on a black background even though it should be white. The picture below shows what I mean. Any suggestions? Sometimes if I rescale the axes the text is drawn normal but if I close and reopen it the test is drawn with a black background. If I print to eps, things look fine in the eps file.
Results 1 to 15 of 39
-
16th December 2008, 11:04 PM #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 28
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Grace Font Problems
Last edited by kanato; 16th December 2008 at 11:11 PM.
-
2nd January 2009, 10:39 PM #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Please people ....some put some help on this issue ..... I am a graduate student and I use grace a lot ..... but after installing grace in fedora 10, I have the same problem ........ the fonts on the axis tics are not clear ..... just the same problem as the last post .....
by the way here is the font sets that I have installed in my box ......
can any one guess what is the problem here??Code:[user@localhost]# yum list | grep fonts VLGothic-fonts.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 installed VLGothic-fonts-proportional.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 installed abyssinica-fonts.noarch 1.0-2.fc8 installed baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common.noarch 2.2-9.fc10 installed baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim.noarch 2.2-9.fc10 installed bitmap-fonts.noarch 0.3-6.fc10 installed bitstream-vera-fonts.noarch 1.10-8 installed cjkunifonts-uming.noarch 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10 installed dejavu-fonts.noarch 2.26-2.fc10 installed dejavu-fonts-experimental.noarch 2.26-2.fc10 installed dejavu-lgc-fonts.noarch 2.26-2.fc10 installed fonts-ISO8859-2.noarch 1.0-19.fc10 installed fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch 1.0-19.fc10 installed fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch 1.0-19.fc10 installed fonts-KOI8-R.noarch 1.0-10.fc8 installed fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi.noarch 1.0-10.fc8 installed fonts-KOI8-R-75dpi.noarch 1.0-10.fc8 installed fonts-hebrew-fancy.noarch 0.20051122-4.fc10 installed fonts-truetype-apl.i386 4.22.4-4.fc10 installed fonts-x11-apl.i386 4.22.4-4.fc10 installed gfs-artemisia-fonts.noarch 20070415-7.fc10 installed gfs-baskerville-fonts.noarch 20070327-8.fc10 installed gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.noarch 20070415-7.fc10 installed gfs-bodoni-fonts.noarch 20070415-6.fc10 installed gfs-complutum-fonts.noarch 20070413-8.fc10 installed gfs-didot-classic-fonts.noarch 20080702-2.fc10 installed gfs-didot-fonts.noarch 20070616-7.fc10 installed gfs-gazis-fonts.noarch 20080318-3.fc10 installed gfs-neohellenic-fonts.noarch 20070415-6.fc10 installed gfs-olga-fonts.noarch 20060908-6.fc10 installed gfs-porson-fonts.noarch 20060908-8.fc10 installed gfs-solomos-fonts.noarch 20071114-7.fc10 installed gfs-theokritos-fonts.noarch 20070415-7.fc10 installed ghostscript-fonts.noarch 5.50-19.fc10 installed jomolhari-fonts.noarch 0.003-5.fc10 installed kacst-fonts.noarch 2.0-1.fc10 installed khmeros-fonts-base.noarch 5.0-3.fc10 installed liberation-fonts.noarch 1.04.92-1.fc10 installed lklug-fonts.noarch 0.2.2-6.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-bengali.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-gujarati.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-hindi.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-kannada.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-kashmiri.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-konkani.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-maithili.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-malayalam.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-marathi.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-nepali.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-oriya.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-punjabi.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-sindhi.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-tamil.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed lohit-fonts-telugu.noarch 2.3.1-1.fc10 installed mathml-fonts.noarch 1.0-22.fc10 installed msttcore-fonts.noarch 2.0-2 installed padauk-fonts.noarch 2.4-2.fc10 installed paktype-fonts.noarch 2.0-2.fc8 installed smc-fonts-meera.noarch 04.1-1.fc10 installed stix-fonts.noarch 0.9-7.fc10 installed texlive-texmf-errata-fonts.noarch 2007-4.fc9 installed texlive-texmf-fonts.noarch 2007-26.fc10 installed thaifonts-scalable.noarch 0.4.9-3.fc9 installed un-core-fonts-dotum.noarch 1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10 installed urw-fonts.noarch 2.4-6.fc10 installed xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch 7.2-6.fc9 installed xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch 7.2-6.fc9 installed xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch 7.2-6.fc9 installed xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch 7.2-6.fc9 installed xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic.noarch 7.2-6.fc9 installed xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch 7.2-6.fc9 installed
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
-
2nd January 2009, 11:04 PM #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Connellsville, PA, USA
- Posts
- 11,306
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Suggestions (but more like "educated" guesses):
> Install package mesa-libGLw; re-start grace.
> Install package yum-utils and then run (as root user or sudo):
package-cleanup --dupes
package-cleanup --problems
to make sure that there are no duplicates/dependency problems.
HTH,
V
-
2nd January 2009, 11:40 PM #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
-
2nd January 2009, 11:59 PM #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Connellsville, PA, USA
- Posts
- 11,306
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Well, poo.
I have seen a number of older programs with somewhat similar (or worse) rendering problems with the newer F9/10 X11/Xorg. However, GRACE appears to be relatively up-to-date code-wise. If you really, truly NEED to try something, then try this mesa-libGLw: http://www.4shared.com/file/76606537...icroni386.html. Ignore the F9 tag - it's fine for F10. NO GUARANTEES, USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. But it should be OK. Not GPG-signed (download and install with 'yum --nogpgcheck localinstall ...', or use RPM to install).
I assume that you have tried several different fonts? From different font packages?? As ugly as this looks on-screen, does it print out OK???
V
-
3rd January 2009, 01:46 AM #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
still Not working!!! I installed the package you provided after removing my old mesa-libGLw 6.5 version ........
by the way may I ask what could be the possible reason for such a hazy fonts?? and what mesa-libGLw has to with it?? just out of curiosity!!
Now I tried another approach ...... I tried to install the grace by compiling myself ...... but I could have any success as it stops just during configure step, with the error
what could this mean?? even though I haveCode:checking for a Motif >= 1002 compatible API... no configure: error: M*tif has not been found
any idea about this??Code:$ yum list | grep motif openmotif.i386 2.3.1-1 installed
yes as you have might notices in my first post I have tried with all lots of fonts with out any improvement though!! and about your last question :: even though it looks in ugly on the screen, it prints OK to any format eps or ps or svg or any other format.I assume that you have tried several different fonts? From different font packages?? As ugly as this looks on-screen, does it print out OK???
One more point : when I install grace with yum : it installs this :
now have a look at this : for dependency it just installs xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi font ........ so the question is : does garce uses only this font?? I dont think so, because then why it asks for motif when I try to compile the source.....Code:================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================================================== Installing: grace i386 5.1.22-2.fc10 fedora 1.2 M Installing for dependencies: fftw2 i386 2.1.5-16.fc9 fedora 394 k lesstif i386 0.95.0-26.fc10 fedora 762 k nedit i386 5.5-20.fc10 fedora 615 k netcdf i386 4.0.0-1.fc10 fedora 575 k t1lib i386 5.1.2-2.fc9 fedora 197 k xbae i386 4.60.4-10.fc10 fedora 158 k xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi noarch 7.2-6.fc9 fedora 928 k
ok may be I am talking silly ..... but my aim is to find a solution ....... so need help
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
-
3rd January 2009, 02:00 AM #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Connellsville, PA, USA
- Posts
- 11,306
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Wll, at least it didn't break anything.
Originally Posted by dbbrtdb
GRACE uses MOTIF (lesstif), and mesa-libGLw is the MOTIF run-time library, as shown: Originally Posted by dbbrtdb
Your compile failed because you do not have the required *-devel RPMs installed. In this case: motif-devel and/or lesstif-devel. Try:Code:~]$ rpm -qi mesa-libGLw [...] Summary : Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets Description : Mesa libGLw runtime library
yum groupinstall "Development Tools" "Development Libraries" "X Development Tools"
You may have to remove my mesa-libGLw first.
The X.Org font prerequisite is indeed odd, but the first poster above had all xorg fonts, but still had a problem. So... I'm not sure what else to suggest next. Install all the development stuff and try again to compile GRACE....
VLast edited by Hlingler; 3rd January 2009 at 02:03 AM.
-
3rd January 2009, 02:35 AM #8
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I am now just trying to compile the source ...... but the problem with the motif is still there even though I have installed the lesstif and lesstif-devel. I also tried with openmotif and openmotif-devel ...... but still no success .........
any way ....... thanks for the replies ........
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
-
3rd January 2009, 04:55 AM #9
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Connellsville, PA, USA
- Posts
- 11,306
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Try:
> Remove my mesa-libGLw
> Install "stock" Fedora mesa-libGLw AND mesa-libGLw-devel
> run (as root user OR sudo): updatedb
> Try to compile again
V
-
3rd January 2009, 06:00 AM #10
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
here is a quick update:
I just installed a new fedora 10 in my Sun xVM VirtualBox. and installed garce just after the first update. The font in the grace is just fine now in the guest version of f10. Now I looked at the list of fonts installed in this new installation. and then I also installed the SAME fonts in my old (the host now) fedora. and removed all extra fonts. But still it does not work : i.e. the grace font in the old (host) one is still ugly.
on the other hand while trying to compile the source I got some success. Here is what I did :
As I mentioned earlier there was a configure error while compiling grace-5.1.22 :
then I looked in the config.log file : it was like :Code:configure: error M*tif has not been found
then I edited the configure file and change all instances of -m486 to -mtune=i486 (got this clue form some other forum!!). Now the the configure was successful.Code:configure:17975: checking for a Motif >= 1002 compatible API configure:18023: gcc -o conftest -O2 -m486 -fno-common -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -L/usr/lib conftest.c -lXm -lXt -lXext -lX11 >&5 cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m486"
I have not yet installed the compiled version and also have not tried your last suggestions yet. I will do it a little later ....... I have to go to sleep now ..........
thanks .............|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
-
3rd January 2009, 06:10 AM #11
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
again a quick reply ........ even the compiled version have the same problem. same ugly font .......... and also tried your suggestions : but still no success.
Now I really do not have any idea what to do next ................|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
-
3rd January 2009, 06:49 AM #12
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Connellsville, PA, USA
- Posts
- 11,306
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
I have no further ideas at this point either. The fact that it looks fine in a virtual machine seems to indicate a possible video driver problem. What video driver is installed in the host system? And in the virtual machine??
BTW: -march=i486 is legal, -m486 is not; but -mtune=generic[i486] is also fine. I'm confused as to why that caused the M*tif error, but... whatever works, I guess.
V
-
3rd January 2009, 05:22 PM #13
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Video driver problem ....... Ok at least you have some clue still ......... thanks ...... now How do I find out exactly what video drivers are installed??
by the way here is what I have in my system ------- I do not know which one is for what!!!
Code:$ yum list | grep xorg-x11-drv xorg-x11-drv-acecad.i386 1.2.2-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-aiptek.i386 1.1.1-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-apm.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-ast.i386 0.85.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-ati.i386 6.9.0-63.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-calcomp.i386 1.1.2-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-cirrus.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-citron.i386 2.2.1-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch.i386 0.2.0-0.1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-digitaledge.i386 1.1.1-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-dmc.i386 1.1.2-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-dummy.i386 0.3.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-dynapro.i386 1.1.2-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-elographics.i386 1.2.3-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-evdev.i386 2.0.7-3.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-fbdev.i386 0.3.1-7.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-fpit.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-geode.i386 2.11.0-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-glint.i386 1.2.1-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-hyperpen.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-i128.i386 1.3.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-i740.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-i810.i386 2.5.0-4.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-keyboard.i386 1.3.0-3.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-mach64.i386 6.8.0-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-magellan.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-mga.i386 1.4.9-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-microtouch.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-mouse.i386 1.3.0-2.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-mutouch.i386 1.2.1-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-neomagic.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.i386 1:0.0.11-1.20081119git65b956f.fc10 xorg-x11-drv-nv.i386 2.1.12-6.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.i386 0.2.903-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-palmax.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-penmount.i386 1.3.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-r128.i386 6.8.0-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-rendition.i386 4.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-s3virge.i386 1.10.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-savage.i386 2.2.0-2.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion.i386 1.6.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-sis.i386 0.10.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-sisusb.i386 0.9.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb.i386 1.1.0-6.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-summa.i386 1.2.0-2.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-synaptics.i386 0.15.2-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-tdfx.i386 1.4.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-tek4957.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-trident.i386 1.3.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-ur98.i386 1.1.0-5.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-v4l.i386 0.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-vesa.i386 2.0.0-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse.i386 12.6.2-1.fc10 installed xorg-x11-drv-vmware.i386 10.16.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-void.i386 1.1.1-9.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-voodoo.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-wiimote.i386 0.0.1-1.fc9 installed xorg-x11-drv-ark.i386 0.7.0-1.fc9 fedora xorg-x11-drv-avivo.i386 0.0.1-7.fc9 fedora xorg-x11-drv-chips.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 fedora xorg-x11-drv-i810-devel.i386 2.5.0-4.fc10 updates xorg-x11-drv-ivtv.i386 1.0.1-2.fc9 fedora xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.i386 177.82-1.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx.i386 173.14.15-2.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-devel.i386 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-libs.i386 173.14.15-2.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx.i386 96.43.09-3.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-devel.i386 96.43.09-3.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-libs.i386 96.43.09-3.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta.i386 177.61.02-1.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta-devel.i386 177.61.02-1.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta-libs.i386 177.61.02-1.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-devel.i386 177.82-1.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs.i386 177.82-1.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-devel.i386 0.2.903-1.fc10 fedora xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd.i386 1.2.3-1.6.20081128git.fc10 updates xorg-x11-drv-s3.i386 0.6.0-2.fc10 fedora xorg-x11-drv-tseng.i386 1.2.0-1.fc9 fedora
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
-
3rd January 2009, 08:07 PM #14
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Connellsville, PA, USA
- Posts
- 11,306
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Many video drivers are installed by default, as you can see (because many people have many different hardware configs). Two things:
glxinfo|grep render
will give driver info. And:
su -
lspci|grep VGA
will give hardware info. For the Virtual Machine, VBox/VMWare itself should tell you in the setup for the virtual machine.
V
-
3rd January 2009, 08:57 PM #15
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Graz, Austria
- Posts
- 22
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
here is what I have :
Code:$ glxinfo|grep render direct rendering: Yes OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Q35 GEM 20080716 x86/MMX/SSE2
about virtual box video driver ...... I could not find any info for the video driver.....Code:# lspci|grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82Q35 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
here is a screen shot of the VBox fedora 10 details :
I am not sure whether this gives any clue to you or not about the video driver used ..... any way I could not find any other info ..........|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-------cheers--------|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|-----DBBRTDB-----|
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Reply With Quote
.........Similar Threads
-
Grace Font Problems (Merged Thread)
By nacre in forum Using FedoraReplies: 12Last Post: 23rd August 2008, 07:51 PM -
rpm, rpmbuild and grace rpm
By joskaefer in forum Using FedoraReplies: 3Last Post: 28th April 2008, 09:16 PM -
Grace period finished in quota ..
By blackwoodie in forum Servers & NetworkingReplies: 0Last Post: 25th August 2006, 11:04 PM
