Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > The Dungeon > Archived (Click Header To See Sub-Forums) > Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 10 Only)
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Alpha, Beta & Snapshots Discussions (Fedora 10 Only) Post Development Version comments and questions that don't belong in Bugzilla here. These posts will be moved or deleted once the Final version is released

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26th October 2008, 06:00 PM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
ath9k (ar9281) and NetworkManager and N-routers

Hi All,

Having severe problems with ath9k and N-routers (see this bugzilla report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465696).

With the latest yum update, I can connect without Network manager. Never with it. However, connection is slower than molasses and firefox times out. Pings take enormous amount of time.

Some details:
Laptop Sony Viao VGN-FW139E.
FC10 with 2.6.27.3-44.fc10.i686
lspci > 06:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. Device 002a (rev 01)
Connecting to Netgear N-router WNR834Bv2 RangeMax Next Router.

Also, with the 27 series kernel, the wireless light does not turn on as it did for 26 series kernel.

Any insight appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Partha
  #2  
Old 26th October 2008, 07:16 PM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
As for wireless light, it seems that some sysctl variables have disappeared in 2.6.27, specifically dev.wifi.0.softled and dev.wifi.0.ledpins (or something similar, I've forgotten the exact name.) That might be why there's no LED anymore.
I'm not familiar with the ath9k, but judging from the thread, it seems as if you folks are working on troubleshooting it.
Those cards and the ath9k are relatively new, so unfortunately, unlike my 5007, there's not a great deal of experience with it yet.
Have you tried searching Ubuntu forums at all? The reason I ask is that with the large amount of Ubuntu users, there might be someone who's had a similar problem with the same hardware. Of course, if it is specifically the Fedora kernel, that won't help.
(On the other hand, a recent Intrepid 2.6.27 update broke the ath5k module, though it's fixed by installing backports.)
  #3  
Old 26th October 2008, 09:27 PM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Scottro,

Thanks for your response. Appreciate it. Nice it isn't it? Something that was easily available before is no longer available in the name of progress?

Yes - I was wondering if any other user here has similar equipment. I will try the Ubuntu forums as well.

Partha
  #4  
Old 26th October 2008, 11:01 PM
scottro's Avatar
scottro Offline
Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,142
That is the trouble with Fedora. Although it seems to sometimes want to be a desktop distribution, it's still very much a testing distro, or developer's distro, if you prefer.
There really oughta be something in between the stability of CentOS/RHEL and Fedora's bleeding edge, a stable Fedora if you will, for those of us who like the gee whiz stuff that you sometimes get with newer kernels but don't want every upgrade to be an adventure.

Easier said than done, of course.
  #5  
Old 26th October 2008, 11:43 PM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
I still don't get why something that was working was removed. Anyway c'est la vie.

I checked out Ubuntu. This seems to be a big problem over there as well. No connection using ath9k.

I have made a bit of a progress though ....

I stopped Network manager and wpa_supplicant. Also, blacklisted ipv6. Then I tried connecting. First it would not connect. Then suddenly when I tried dhclient again, I got a stable connection!! However, I could do this when the link quality as reported by iwconfig was 70/100.

Now, I am using this connection. Let's see how long this last.

Thanks,
Partha
  #6  
Old 27th October 2008, 12:09 AM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Update:

Didn't last very long. Funny thing is, I can ping and do traceroute etc. But the amount of time it takes is humongous. Needless to say, firefox times out.
  #7  
Old 27th October 2008, 10:03 PM
Balinus Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montréal, Qc
Posts: 27
I have the same card and it doesn't work with Fedora 10 beta, nor does it work with RC of Ubuntu 8.10.
  #8  
Old 27th October 2008, 11:42 PM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balinus View Post
I have the same card and it doesn't work with Fedora 10 beta, nor does it work with RC of Ubuntu 8.10.
Hi,

Can you be more specific? Can you tell us the symptoms? This will helps us all to get this card working faster. Also, can you also add your comments to the bugzilla at the top of this thread?

Thanks!
Partha
  #9  
Old 28th October 2008, 07:20 PM
Balinus Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montréal, Qc
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by partha View Post
Hi,

Can you be more specific? Can you tell us the symptoms? This will helps us all to get this card working faster. Also, can you also add your comments to the bugzilla at the top of this thread?

Thanks!
Partha
Sure, it seems to try to connect...ask for password and hangs there withtout completing the connection process.

I didn't tried anything more than that though.

Bugzilla is over my understanding so I'm not sure I can be of good assistance.
  #10  
Old 28th October 2008, 11:31 PM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balinus View Post
Sure, it seems to try to connect...ask for password and hangs there withtout completing the connection process.
Have you tried connecting without any security? Are you able to turn off wpa/wpa2 and connect? Could you try that?
Quote:
I didn't tried anything more than that though.

Bugzilla is over my understanding so I'm not sure I can be of good assistance.
[/QUOTE]

It is really quite simple. You need to open an account. After you do that 0 click on the link on the first post and add your comments. Look at my comments and add similar stuff.

Thanks,
Partha
  #11  
Old 30th October 2008, 07:32 PM
Balinus Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montréal, Qc
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by partha View Post
Have you tried connecting without any security? Are you able to turn off wpa/wpa2 and connect? Could you try that?
I'll try!

But I lost mt DVD with Fedora 10 beta, so re-installing might be a problem in the short-term. I guess I'll wait for the official release as november is quite busy for me.
  #12  
Old 30th October 2008, 11:41 PM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balinus View Post
I'll try!

But I lost mt DVD with Fedora 10 beta, so re-installing might be a problem in the short-term. I guess I'll wait for the official release as november is quite busy for me.
OK - sounds good. However, you don't need the DVD to change the security settings. That setting is in your router.

Thanks,
Partha
  #13  
Old 7th November 2008, 01:28 AM
younker Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
I have the problem too, I installed F10 preview on my macbook C2D, but I can not connect to my wireless N router, I can get connection when running with live CD mode, but can not when start up from hard disk, the same problem exists when I tried Ubuntu 8.10 and OpenSuse 11.1 Beta 4, so I think there are something wrong about ath9k driver, I do really hope that this issue can be solved in the final version, since I think F10 is the best choice for my macbook pro.

Btw, according to some posts in ubuntu forums, I tried to blacklist the bluetooth module, but not work.
  #14  
Old 7th November 2008, 10:40 AM
partha Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Younker,

Can you add your comments to the bug listed above (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465696) ?

Thanks,
Partha
  #15  
Old 8th November 2008, 01:19 AM
younker Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by partha View Post
Younker,

Can you add your comments to the bug listed above (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465696) ?

Thanks,
Partha
Partha, I have added my comment to that bug, now I can connect to my wireless N router by disable NM serivce.
 

Tags
ar9281, ath9k, networkmanager, nrouters

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weak connection from ath9k junxuan Servers & Networking 2 7th July 2009 02:21 PM
WPA, Networkmanager, Netgear Routers, ipw3495 twilightomni Servers & Networking 9 20th February 2009 03:45 AM
F9 kernel update adds ath9k driver. nyjetshead Servers & Networking 1 26th January 2009 02:01 PM
DWA-556 ATH9k not working on F10 final release download dvd Broly Servers & Networking 5 7th January 2009 11:50 PM
ath9k daves2357 Hardware & Laptops 8 14th September 2008 11:42 PM


Current GMT-time: 15:04 (Tuesday, 21-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat