Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 4th July 2004, 07:09 AM
Cr0n_J0b Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 75
NETDEV errors with FC2 eth1

I keep seeing these errors every few seconds on my internal network card.

Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth1: transmit timed out
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: eth1: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status e000.
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: diagnostics: net 0cc0 media 8802 dma 00000000 fifo 8800
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: Flags; bus-master 1, dirty 1(1) current 17(1)
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: Transmit list 00000000 vs. 18d312a0.
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 0: @18d31200 length 8000006e status 8000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 1: @18d312a0 length 80000046 status 00000046
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 2: @18d31340 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 3: @18d313e0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 4: @18d31480 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 5: @18d31520 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 6: @18d315c0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 7: @18d31660 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 8: @18d31700 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 9: @18d317a0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 10: @18d31840 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 11: @18d318e0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 12: @18d31980 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 13: @18d31a20 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 14: @18d31ac0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 15: @18d31b60 length 8000006e status 8000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: eth1: Transmit error, Tx status register 90.
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: Flags; bus-master 1, dirty 1(1) current 17(1)
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: Transmit list 16d31340 vs. 18d312a0.
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 0: @18d31200 length 8000006e status 8000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 1: @18d312a0 length 80000046 status 00000046
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 2: @18d31340 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 3: @18d313e0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 4: @18d31480 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 5: @18d31520 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 6: @18d315c0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 7: @18d31660 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 8: @18d31700 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 9: @18d317a0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 10: @18d31840 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 11: @18d318e0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 12: @18d31980 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 13: @18d31a20 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 14: @18d31ac0 length 8000006e status 0000006e
Jul 3 10:51:35 ip68-231-208-189 kernel: 15: @18d31b60 length 8000006e status 8000006e


Any thoughts?

I have:

eth0 VIA chipset ether port
eth1 Kingston 100TX Tulip card
eth2 3Com Boomerang
eth3 3Com Boomerang

IFCONFIG.

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0A:E6:E9C:B5
inet addr:68.231.208.189 Bcast:68.231.211.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20a:e6ff:fee9:dcb5/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:12094899 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2489624 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:2269799182 (2164.6 Mb) TX bytes:146541727 (139.7 Mb)
Interrupt:5 Base address:0xd00

eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:972:76:4E
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::260:97ff:fec2:764e/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:18441 dropped:0 overruns:18443 carrier:18443
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:32125 (31.3 Kb) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe800

eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:248:5D:E6
inet addr:192.168.1.22 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::2a0:24ff:fed8:5de6/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1 errors:12 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:2 carrier:2
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:32125 (31.3 Kb) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe400

eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 000:F0:30:0E:A6
inet addr:192.168.1.23 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::2c0:f0ff:fe30:ea6/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1465866 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:808103 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:2 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:988013911 (942.2 Mb) TX bytes:575624529 (548.9 Mb)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xcf80

lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:2965 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2965 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1846675 (1.7 Mb) TX bytes:1846675 (1.7 Mb)

vmnet8 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:560:00:08
inet addr:172.16.56.1 Bcast:172.16.56.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:fec0:8/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:309 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)


mii-tool

eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok
eth1: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
eth2: no autonegotiation, 100baseTx-FD, link ok
eth3: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok


thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6th July 2004, 12:47 AM
maxut Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:972:76:4E
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::260:97ff:fec2:764e/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:18441 dropped:0 overruns:18443 carrier:18443

collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:32125 (31.3 Kb) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe800

something wrong with eth1. maybe cables, maybe drivers, maybe wrong configs. if i were u, i would change the cable and RJ-45 connectors first. if it stil keep collisions, i would change that NIC card.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th July 2004, 06:25 AM
Cr0n_J0b Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 75
Well I switched the cables...but I'm worried it's software related.

I'd hate to have to go get another card.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th July 2004, 06:35 AM
crackers's Avatar
crackers Offline
Retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,423
Swap the Tulip card with one of the 3Coms (in the slots) - they should "switch" between eth1 and eth2. That'll aid in determining if the card is bad or not. You might also be having a conflict between the drivers (doubtful, though). I've used different chipset cards before and not had problems (granted, this was non-FC, but it should still apply unless the kernel developers have really broken something bad - also doubtful, but possible).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th July 2004, 06:48 AM
Cr0n_J0b Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 75
I have a feeling that it was the cable...I'm checking the logs and I'm not getting the constant messages....I had it hooked with a CAT 3 cable...don't know why...

We'll see if this is a real fix or just a short term bandaid.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21st July 2004, 03:42 AM
daddyr Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1
I am getting this same problem, except that it did not start until yesterday when I upgraded from RH 9 to FC 2, so I'm pretty sure its not a hardware or cable problem.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th September 2004, 09:29 AM
uNstAbLe Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
Cool Disable kudzu..

Take a look to this thread:

http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/vorte...st/002428.html

The problem should be related to kudzu, disabling it in my case solved the problem:

> IIRC, kudzu from Fedora did not play nice with the 3c59x driver, trying to get some
> data that needed hardware access while the hardware was still in sleep
> state. Some cards were disturbed by this and did not function
> afterward; some others (like Tornado/905C) were not disturbed. Alan
> Cox submitted a fix at some point, but, as I have lost track of the
> issue, I don't know if it actually fixed the problem.

> So, my suggestion is to disable kudzu ('chkconfig kudzu off') then
> reboot. If the network starts functioning, then you had this problem.
> An update of the kernel and/or kudzu (if available) might provide the
> fix and will allow using the network while still keeping kudzu on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
errors, eth1, fc2, netdev

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Current GMT-time: 02:14 (Monday, 20-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat