Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > Fedora 17/18 > Using Fedora
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Using Fedora General support for current versions. Ask questions about Fedora and it's software that do not belong in any other forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21st March 2008, 03:47 PM
StefanJ Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
upgrade: puzzling conflict message

I poked around the archives for similar cases, but couldn't find a match to this problem.

I'm upgrading my MythTV box's Fedora 7 install prior to upgrading MythTV itself. Right now it's happily running:

[root@mythtv ~]# echo $KVER
2.6.22.5-76.fc7

I disabled atrpms and freshrpms by editing their repos.d files. I also have protectbase installed. Here is what yum can access right now:

Quote:
[root@mythtv ~]# yum repolist
Loading "protectbase" plugin
repo id repo name status
adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated enabled
fedora Fedora 7 - i386 enabled
livna Livna for Fedora Core 7 - i386 - Base enabled
updates Fedora 7 - i386 - Updates enabled
I ran 'yum clean all'
'yum upgrade' checks what it needs to upgrade, checks dependencies, downloads the 360 of so files, and gets to the point where it runs a transaction test. Then it spews hundreds of messages like the following:

Quote:
file /lib/modules/2.6.23.15-80.fc7/kernel/sound/core/seq/snd-
seq.ko conflicts between attempted installs of kernel-2.6.23.15
-80.fc7 and kernel-2.6.23.15-80.fc7
Huh? There's a conflict between two installs of the same kernel?

I'm guessing that I haven't trimmed my repository list enough . . . are there any there that should go?

Also, earlier on when I DID have freshrpms installed, it had trouble finding the online repository information. Has this changed? Should I even bother with freshrpms?

Thanks,

Stefan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22nd March 2008, 04:16 PM
StefanJ Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
I tried this again with livna disabled. Fewer packages downloaded, but same results: lots of messages complaining about conflicts between A and A.

DUH! My bad. I had copied the disable atrmps line twice. When I disabled livna, things went much better. I'm down to removing old libraries and their dependencies . . . old Myth related stuff it appears. Later I'll reenable atrpms and get the latest versions back.

Last edited by StefanJ; 22nd March 2008 at 05:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23rd March 2008, 05:50 AM
StefanJ Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 101
I thought I would complete this thread for the benefit of others.

Disabling livna was the key. After that, there was just the removal of a few leftover bits of MythTV to allow the upgrade to complete.

Then I had to RE enable livna, since it was the only repository with the kmod-nvidia package for the new kernel.

And then reenable atrpms to get MythTV.

Whew.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
conflict, message, puzzling, upgrade

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
font conflict error on upgrade / installation of software mamehmood Installation and Live Media 0 27th February 2009 06:58 PM
yum upgrade conflict cedtech23 Using Fedora 6 28th November 2008 06:34 PM
An NFS problem puzzling me ... georgesgiralt Servers & Networking 0 16th July 2008 11:50 PM
Puzzling Problem with XFS unixfanatic Using Fedora 0 14th January 2007 06:26 AM
yum update glibc conflict after FC3->FC4 upgrade AaronHarwood Installation and Live Media 0 12th March 2006 01:47 PM


Current GMT-time: 00:21 (Wednesday, 22-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat