Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > Fedora 17/18 > Servers & Networking
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Servers & Networking Discuss any Fedora server problems and Networking issues such as dhcp, IP numbers, wlan, modems, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th December 2007, 02:51 PM
geek1234 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3
strange association issue with AP, cant route packets

I cannot route packets from the thinkpad x60 on fc8 even though wireless card is associated with an AP which is open and unsecured. Network mager just cannot get an ip address. Using dhclient returns no dhcpoffers even though I know it is on offer because windows and everyone else uses that. Static routes did not work either and I could not even ping my gateway. So it is something related to association with AP but cant figure out what.

I have th intel 3945 and fc8 has the iwl2945 driver. Here is some diagnostic output. Pay close attention to the output of dmesg below. Even though the network is open, i see messages that talk about authentication and deauthentication to AP. I feel that this 'deauthentication' is the problem and I am not sure what it is.

iwconfig output
---------------

wlan0 IEEE 802.11a ESSID:"XXX"
Mode:Managed Frequency:5.22 GHz Access Point: 00:133:10:5E:20
Bit Rate=11 Mb/s Tx-Power=17 dBm
Retry min limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr=2352 B
Link Quality=82/100 Signal level=-52 dBm Noise level=-86 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0


ifconfig output
---------------
wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1C:BF:26:37:FE
inet6 addr: fec0::9:21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Site
inet6 addr: 2002:a027:f3a1:9:21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: 2002:a027:fc0f:8:21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fec0::8:21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Site
inet6 addr: 2002:a027:fdf7:8:21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: 2002:a027:f6a0:8:21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: 2002:803b:9d69:8:21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::21c:bfff:fe26:37fe/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:107468 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:13 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:24194272 (23.0 MiB) TX bytes:1302 (1.2 KiB)




wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:13:c3:10:5e:20
wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:13:c3:10:5e:20 (capab=0x421 status=0 aid=255)
wlan0: associated
wlan0: CTS protection enabled (BSSID=00:13:c3:10:5e:20)
wlan0: switched to short barker preamble (BSSID=00:13:c3:10:5e:20)
wlan0: WMM queue=2 aci=0 acm=0 aifs=3 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 burst=0
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
wlan0: disassociate(reason=3)
wlan0: WMM queue=3 aci=1 acm=0 aifs=7 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 burst=0
wlan0: WMM queue=1 aci=2 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=7 cWmax=15 burst=30
wlan0: WMM queue=0 aci=3 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=3 cWmax=7 burst=15
wlan0: RX deauthentication from 00:13:c3:10:5e:20 (reason=2)
wlan0: deauthenticated
wlan0: RX deauthentication from 00:13:c3:10:5e:20 (reason=2)
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:13:c3:10:5e:20
wlan0: RX authentication from 00:13:c3:10:5e:20 (alg=0 transaction=2 status=0)
wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:13:c3:10:5e:20
wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:13:c3:10:5e:20 (capab=0x421 status=0 aid=3)
wlan0: associated
wlan0: CTS protection enabled (BSSID=00:13:c3:10:5e:20)
wlan0: switched to short barker preamble (BSSID=00:13:c3:10:5e:20)
wlan0: disassociate(reason=3)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13th December 2007, 05:09 PM
stevea's Avatar
stevea Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 8,302
I suspect it's your WAP.

What wireless router do you use ?

You should NOT have the SSID (aka ESSID) hidden, this is not a security feature (See the Cisco website for details).

What authentication method do you use ?

An "iwlist scan" post might be useful. Perhaps you are in same or an adjacent channel as another WAP. Normally you should arrange for your access point to be at least 2 away from any other in the neighborhood (channel 9 vs channel 11 for example).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13th December 2007, 05:22 PM
stevea's Avatar
stevea Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 8,302
Ignore the channel comment, you are on 802.11a - no idea about the issue there.

RX packets:107468 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:13 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

This looks very odd unless the system has been up for hours and not connected.
You received 100k packets but have only transmitted 13. 13 out makes sense if you are
just trying to connect but the 100k is odd.

Your 11mbit rate is quite low for an 'a'.
I'd suggest you fix your WAP to supply 802.11g only if possible.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
association, packets, route, strange

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
strange ip route problem andy2008 Servers & Networking 5 24th March 2009 07:27 PM
Permanently adding static route issue with FC7 sling1947 Servers & Networking 1 23rd June 2007 01:40 AM
Strange route dnar Using Fedora 1 28th July 2006 01:45 PM
FTP Issue: connect: No route to host Fungi2003 Using Fedora 5 9th June 2005 04:15 PM


Current GMT-time: 15:34 (Saturday, 25-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat