Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > Fedora 17/18 > Using Fedora
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Using Fedora General support for current versions. Ask questions about Fedora and it's software that do not belong in any other forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st June 2007, 04:30 AM
The_Jaymz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 342
Arrow Yum - Package not signed. Fedora 7

Clean install. first thing I do is yum update. I get this error:

Package libwnck-2.18.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm is not signed

Anyone know what's going on?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st June 2007, 04:36 AM
charlie_D Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 9
I had the same problem, a 'yum update' from the terminal works fine though.

Not immensely helpful I suppose, but I have nothing else that needs updating after that

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 1st June 2007, 04:38 AM
The_Jaymz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 342
I ran it from the command line. Still no dice.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1st June 2007, 04:39 AM
The_Jaymz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 342
Arrow

Here's the actual output:
Code:
[root@JMH-LINUX ~]# yum update
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libwnck.i386 0:2.18.2-1.fc7 set to be updated
---> Package firefox.i386 0:2.0.0.4-1.fc7 set to be updated
---> Package mutt.i386 5:1.5.14-4.fc7 set to be updated
---> Package libexif.i386 0:0.6.15-1.fc7 set to be updated
---> Package yelp.i386 0:2.18.1-4.fc7 set to be updated

Dependencies Resolved

=============================================================================
 Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size 
=============================================================================
Updating:
 firefox                 i386       2.0.0.4-1.fc7    updates            21 M
 libexif                 i386       0.6.15-1.fc7     updates           229 k
 libwnck                 i386       2.18.2-1.fc7     updates           193 k
 mutt                    i386       5:1.5.14-4.fc7   updates           1.5 M
 yelp                    i386       2.18.1-4.fc7     updates           682 k

Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install      0 Package(s)         
Update       5 Package(s)         
Remove       0 Package(s)         

Total download size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:


Package libwnck-2.18.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm is not signed
[root@JMH-LINUX ~]#
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st June 2007, 04:44 AM
The_Jaymz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 342
Arrow

For anyone else with this problem, a quick-and-dirty solution is to edit /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo and set gpgcheck=1 to gpgcheck=0
That comes with a risk though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st June 2007, 04:46 AM
Demz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
why has packages still got the fc Tag? an not f7 ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 1st June 2007, 05:08 AM
SlowJet Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,002
The c in fc7 stands for collections, not core.

I think the yum reps are over lapping or mixed.

From fc7rc2 I have libwnck-2.18.0.3.fc7

yet his is way newr.
The only update I got for fc7rc2 was smolt.
I did not alter the repos at all. They were already pointing to the fc7 set.

The package was usighed because it didn't come from fc7 updates.


SJ
__________________
Do the Math
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st June 2007, 06:41 AM
danwaineo's Avatar
danwaineo Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 243
I have this same issue. If it didn't come from updates, then where is it from? I see those same packages here:

http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pu...pdates/7/i386/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 1st June 2007, 06:59 AM
The_Jaymz Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mobile, Alabama, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 342
I tweaked the repo file to get it working. Haven't had any problem since then, but I've only been installing software. I don't think any of the packages came from the updates repository.
__________________
[SIZE=3]-Jaymz
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 1st June 2007, 10:39 AM
PeTzZz Offline
Retired Community Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tartu
Posts: 1,550
I found it reported in the Bugzilla. It is fixed now. I don't know how pup (Software Updater) works and notices fixed packages, but you can do yum clean all in the terminal and then yum update.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 1st June 2007, 03:38 PM
danwaineo's Avatar
danwaineo Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 243
Thanks Petzzz,

I think they forgot to sign the packages. I downloaded new packages from the redhat download site, since I doesn't look like the mirrors have them yet. Everything works ok now.

-Dan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fedora, package, signed, yum

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie's quuestion: RPM package not signed featips Using Fedora 3 3rd July 2008 04:30 AM
package not signed problem iain454 Using Fedora 11 11th February 2008 07:45 PM
Package not signed. RajuTiwari Using Fedora 6 28th December 2007 12:59 PM


Current GMT-time: 14:38 (Saturday, 25-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat