 |
 |
 |
 |
| Using Fedora General support for current versions. Ask questions about Fedora and it's software that do not belong in any other forum. |
16th October 2006, 02:58 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Amarok gone from extras fc5 x86_64
Can't find amarok rpm files in fc5 x86_64 extras. They still exists for i386 and for FC4.
|
17th October 2006, 03:43 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Age: 35
Posts: 4,419
|
|
|
Now that you mention it, there's an update that is conflicting with my installed Amarok, libtunepimp? Maybe worth asking in Bugzilla?
__________________
If ain't broken, don't fix it! :eek:
If can be improved, go for it! :cool:
FedoraForum Community forums lurker.
Fedora user since RHL 5.2 :cool:
Systems: Laptop, Main System, Netbook.
|
17th October 2006, 07:32 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 15
|
|
|
Agreed. I can't see this either, although I do have the latest libtunepimp.
Any ideas? Are we waiting for a build from the amarokers?
Cheers
Mat
|
17th October 2006, 08:16 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Age: 35
Posts: 4,419
|
|
|
Don't know, but in the mean time I can upgrade libtunepimp due to Amarok being installed, and since Amarok is not in Extras ATM, I can't uninstall it, upgrade and re-install... Most likely there'll be a new Amarok compatible with the new libtunepimp. Also, wasn't Amarok moved to Livna? Just asking, I'll go check Livna and see if they've got it there or what the heck happened... Bugzilla time?
__________________
If ain't broken, don't fix it! :eek:
If can be improved, go for it! :cool:
FedoraForum Community forums lurker.
Fedora user since RHL 5.2 :cool:
Systems: Laptop, Main System, Netbook.
|
17th October 2006, 08:17 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Age: 35
Posts: 4,419
|
|
|
Sure enough, Amarok's not there, only the non-free extras package.
__________________
If ain't broken, don't fix it! :eek:
If can be improved, go for it! :cool:
FedoraForum Community forums lurker.
Fedora user since RHL 5.2 :cool:
Systems: Laptop, Main System, Netbook.
|
23rd October 2006, 03:41 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 45
|
|
|
Any update on this situation?
|
23rd October 2006, 02:31 PM
|
![[H]omer's Avatar](image.php?s=65e252f5587c37aef5ae7d01a4004f2c&u=23141&dateline=1145024189) |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 25
|
|
|
|
23rd October 2006, 07:29 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Age: 35
Posts: 4,419
|
|
|
It was good while it lasted.I'll stick to Listen, kthx.
Seriously, though... I hope the main developer changes his mind. If not, it'd be interesting to see Amarok in Livna altogether (linked against xine) and be done with it.
__________________
If ain't broken, don't fix it! :eek:
If can be improved, go for it! :cool:
FedoraForum Community forums lurker.
Fedora user since RHL 5.2 :cool:
Systems: Laptop, Main System, Netbook.
|
27th October 2006, 04:14 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
|
|
|
Thanks homer. I grabbed your srpm and rebuilt on FC6. Working fine.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 18:04 (Wednesday, 19-06-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
