Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center

Go Back   FedoraForum.org > Fedora Resources > Guides & Solutions (Not For Questions)
FedoraForum Search

Forgot Password? Join Us!

Guides & Solutions (Not For Questions) Post your guides here (No links to Blogs accepted). You can also append your comments/questions to a guide, but don't start a new thread to ask a question. Use another forum for that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91  
Old 31st July 2015, 06:49 PM
debo2011 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: all world
Posts: 142
linuxfirefox
Exclamation Re: PostInstallerF

Quote:
Originally Posted by glennzo View Post
Here's what I get when I try to install this program under Fedora 21 I686.

Same issue as broadstairs?

I should add that all seems well with postinstallerf under Fedora 22.
Hi glennzo, yes is serious problem! Sourceforge experienced a storage fault; and I can't upload the new package ; but I hope tomorrow it will available for all.

http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourcefo...pdate-for-728/

My last option would COPR. But there is very limited, and I can not pack most packages, provided by PostInstallerF

Last edited by debo2011; 31st July 2015 at 06:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 23rd June 2016, 11:20 AM
bob Online
Administrator (yeah, back again)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colton, NY; Junction of Heaven & Earth (also Routes 56 & 68).
Age: 71
Posts: 22,950
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

David, used your script for F24 Gnome and it's generally working very well, however dnf updates now shows:

Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld x86_64 1.8.1-4.fc24 postinstallerf 178 k

Looks like a tweak is indicated.
__________________
Linux & Beer - That TOTALLY Computes!
Registered Linux User #362651


Don't use any of my solutions on working computers or near small children.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 24th June 2016, 03:54 AM
debo2011 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: all world
Posts: 142
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

Hi! thanks, I am updating now to 1.8.2; and it will solved the problem, gstreamer1 updated to 1.8.2 and affected the package.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 26th June 2016, 12:11 AM
ossandon Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chile
Posts: 1
linuxchrome
Re: PostInstallerF

Quote:
Originally Posted by debo2011 View Post
Hi! thanks, I am updating now to 1.8.2; and it will solved the problem, gstreamer1 updated to 1.8.2 and affected the package.

is rpmfusion necessary to use postinstallerf? When will 1.8.2 be ready?

Last edited by ossandon; 26th June 2016 at 02:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 26th June 2016, 04:30 AM
debo2011 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: all world
Posts: 142
linuxfedorafirefox
Smile Re: PostInstallerF

Quote:
Originally Posted by ossandon View Post
is rpmfusion necessary to use postinstallerf? When will 1.8.2 be ready?
Short answer: No. rpmfusion is necessary for some tasks in PostinstallerF (but not a dependency); if you see gstreamer1 isn't part of rpmfusion, gstreamer1-devel is necessary if you want compile all gstreamer1-plugins... Why I provide a 'gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld' in postinstallerf? well for "gstreamer1-plugin-openh264" the future...
Code:
dnf provides gstreamer1
dnf provides gstreamer1-devel

Last edited by debo2011; 26th June 2016 at 06:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 26th June 2016, 07:09 PM
lsatenstein Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,552
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

Quote:
Originally Posted by debo2011 View Post
Coming soon
I'm on F24. I click on mp4's and I get sound only.

I am able to dual boot Chapeau Linux F23, and view my mp4's. Any ideas about getting video to work?
__________________

Leslie
in Montreal


Interesting web sites list
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showth...40#post1697840
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 26th June 2016, 07:17 PM
antikythera Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,189
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

is ffmpeg-libs installed leslie? if not try installing that rpm
__________________
Fedora 25 MATE|Gigabyte GA-AM1M-S2H, Athlon 5350, 8GB Corsair Vengeance CML8GX3M2A1600C9 LP Kit (XMP mode), Seagate ST1000DM003, HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH24NSB
Fedora 24 MATE|Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A512, Intel Core i3-3110m, 16GB Crucial DDR3L-1600 Kit, Sandisk Ultra Fit 64GB USB3, Startech ECUSB3S254F, Samsung SN-208FB, Centrino Wireless-N 2230
--
Download, Install and Share Fedora - Official ISO Torrents | Live ISO Respins containing post-release updates
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 26th June 2016, 07:46 PM
smr54 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,800
linuxfirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

What player do you use, and it does it play x265 (HEVC) videos? This isn't yet consistent across distributions, and mplayer, at least, is usually able to play everything, but, for example, most Ubuntu offshoots have a version of mplayer that won't play x265 video. Their mpv will. At one point, Fedora's mpv wouldn't, but it does in its latest iteration.

To see if it's x265 encoded, if you have ffmpeg installed, you can run ffprobe -hide_banner <filename>.

If it does show that it's x265 (hevc) encoded, you may need a different player.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 26th June 2016, 11:56 PM
debo2011 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: all world
Posts: 142
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

rpmfusion-non-free isn't complete in this moment; but all can install unitedrpms , repository
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 27th June 2016, 11:33 AM
bob Online
Administrator (yeah, back again)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colton, NY; Junction of Heaven & Earth (also Routes 56 & 68).
Age: 71
Posts: 22,950
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

Before installing unitedrpms, I'd carefully read the description. Personally, there are things there that disturb me.
__________________
Linux & Beer - That TOTALLY Computes!
Registered Linux User #362651


Don't use any of my solutions on working computers or near small children.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 5th October 2016, 11:23 AM
BkkLQ Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 73
linuxubuntufirefox
Re: PostInstallerF

I'd also be careful with PostInstallerF, it has some major security flaws:

1. the .repo files disables GPG checks: repo_gpgcheck=0

2. some scripts (e.g. the RPMFusion installer) use --nogpgcheck without checking the signature of packages downloaded.

3. Some files are downloaded from an unencrpyted (HTTP instead of HTTPS) connection and no signatures are checked.


So as a general rule, don't ever open metadata files or run applications or installers for an insecure connection. To make a connection secure you should at least download it through HTTPS (and check the certificate validity) or check the signature (PGP or S/MIME) against a known key downloaded through a secure connection.

There are some more quality issues in this script, for example:

* the postinstaller will fail if a /tmp/.pictures folder already exists and is owned by different user. You should use mktemp instead.

* the "gnome" script is using zenity to get the password for sudo, but it is unclear whether to input the root or user password. Instead you should use pkexec, which you do sometimes.

* the software is inconsistent about using yad vs. using zenity. One of them should be enough.

If you want me to have a more detailled look at this software, please leave me a personal message.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
postinstallation fedora, postinstallerf, repositories, scripts, sudeenly

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Current GMT-time: 11:38 (Saturday, 03-12-2016)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat