 |
 |
 |
 |
| Using Fedora General support for current versions. Ask questions about Fedora and it's software that do not belong in any other forum. |

17th February 2010, 11:28 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3

|
|
|
How do you install Cinelerra to Fedora 12?
I've recently switched to Fedora and im having trouble getting Cinelerra to install at all. Can anyone help me with which files to download, and what commands to use? Need more info let me know.
|

17th February 2010, 03:15 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 345

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Van Halen
I've recently switched to Fedora and im having trouble getting Cinelerra to install at all. Can anyone help me with which files to download, and what commands to use? Need more info let me know.
|
Ive looked at cinelerra as I was looking for good video editing software. I really cannot help you with the cinelerra install on fedora Im sorry. However, If you are just looking for good video editing/creating software take a look at kdenlive. Ive been using it for a few days now and find it very nice.
coffee
__________________
Fedora 17 *LXDE
AMD X6 1090T / 8GiG RAM / 9500GT
No gnomes here.
|

17th February 2010, 04:24 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5

|
|
Hello Adolf!
You can do the follwing:
At the terminal tape as root:
1- rpm --import http://ATrpms.net/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
2- gedit /etc/yum.conf
At the end of the file add:
[atrpms]
name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms
baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/f$releasever-$basearch/atrpms/stable
gpgkey=http://ATrpms.net/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms
gpgcheck=1
3- At the terminal again tape:
yum update
4- yum install cinelerra
I hoppe this can help you!
|

17th February 2010, 04:50 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connellsville, PA, USA
Posts: 11,289

|
|
A word of caution: beware of mixing conflicting 3rd-party repos ("repo hell" syndrome), such as ATRPMs and RPMFusion: http://rpmfusion.org/FedoraThirdPartyRepos
However, there is no other reason not to use ATRPMs to get stuff like Cinelerra. You should keep one or the other(s) of conflicting repos disabled for automatic updates.
Also: here's their configuration page: http://atrpms.net/install.html
V
|

17th February 2010, 06:14 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3

|
|
|
well I think I'll hold off on cinelerra for a little while, little confusing getting that one to install. I'll try again when im not such a newb at this.
|

17th February 2010, 11:36 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 304

|
|
Hi
You can download Cinelerra here, the F11 version works great on F12. Just extract it and copy it to the location of your choice, nothing has to be permanently installed to your system and no changes are made, just a ~/.cinelerra will be created for your settings and thats it, it runs from your extraction folder.
http://heroinewarrior.com/cinelerra.php#download
As Hlingler mentioned, do not use the atrpms version.
|

22nd February 2010, 11:54 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2

|
|
I worked through the fun of getting a working RPMFusion rpm for cinelerra - it's up here if you're interested:
http://sites.google.com/site/electri...rra-Fedora-12-
I haven't had any problems with it...
Cheers,
Dan
|

22nd February 2010, 07:17 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connellsville, PA, USA
Posts: 11,289

|
|
|
I'm a bit unclear as to why you chose to re-build cinelerra from ATRPMs SRPM, rather than just install their pre-built binary RPM. Installing, but disabling ATRPMs repo (for automatic updates), seems easy enough to me. It can be manually enabled for one-time installs/updates (although the OP seems to be intimidated by this, which is understandable).
V
|

25th February 2010, 12:17 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2

|
|
|
Basically I looked at their prebuilt binary and it looked like it was going to try to pull down a bunch of possibly conflicting packages - I've had a bad experience doing this before and I guess I'm probably overcautious with it. Building the SRPM lets me take advantage of upgrades without the potential pain of a broken package or two... and it seemed a cleaner solution I guess as well.
Dan
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 11:41 (Tuesday, 21-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|