 |
 |
 |
 |
| Using Fedora General support for current versions. Ask questions about Fedora and it's software that do not belong in any other forum. |

27th June 2012, 08:44 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,241

|
|
Least troublesome video card - ?
It used to be that nVIDIA was "king", but even Linus "flipped them off" & given the track record on HERE it appears he had good reason. So, given all this, what IS the least troublesome of the bunch?
--- note that I didn't ask "best" as they all have issues, I know...---
Thanks
__________________
Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...
By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!
|

27th June 2012, 08:47 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posts: n/a

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilly Willy
It used to be that nVIDIA was "king", but even Linus "flipped them off" & given the track record on HERE it appears he had good reason. So, given all this, what IS the least troublesome of the bunch?
--- note that I didn't ask "best" as they all have issues, I know...---
Thanks
|
Linus loves ranting
P.S Nvidia is still number 1
|

27th June 2012, 09:24 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,241

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Yeah, I know he can get rather "mouthy" at times, but I'M not to thrilled with the way nVIDIA is going either, thus the question.
And if they are still #1, then that doesn't say much for video under linux (using proprietary drivers), IMO, as that would mark then ALL as crap.
So far, I'm having pretty good results with the "built in" driver (Nouveau), but they ARE limited. Would be nice if the team can get them up to par on the feature offerings though.
__________________
Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...
By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!
|

27th June 2012, 09:29 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,309

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Depends on the machine and use. My choice is Nvidia in a desktop, but for thermal considerations and simplicity's sake, I use Intel HD (x)000 on laptops these days.
|

27th June 2012, 09:33 PM
|
 |
Gnome-gasmic by choice!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Carolina
Age: 45
Posts: 1,038

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilly Willy
So far, I'm having pretty good results with the "built in" driver (Nouveau), but they ARE limited.
|
Probably stating the obvious, but I have stayed away from hybrid (video card) systems. Intel systems with integrated (intel) video has always worked well for me.
Though I am curious about AMD with ATI video cards and Linux support, might be the future go-to hardware for Linux
__________________
On quest for blue smoke and red rings...
|

28th June 2012, 01:53 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,241

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan
Depends on the machine and use. My choice is Nvidia in a desktop, but for thermal considerations and simplicity's sake, I use Intel HD (x)000 on laptops these days.
|
That is a pretty good point there, I'll keep that in mind.
---------- Post added at 08:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:50 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQdave
Though I am curious about AMD with ATI video cards and Linux support, might be the future go-to hardware for Linux 
|
I'm wondering the same... been hearing that others are having good results, but time will tell.
__________________
Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...
By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!
Last edited by Chilly Willy; 28th June 2012 at 01:55 AM.
|

28th June 2012, 02:47 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,409

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
This article may say something about the future for linux video cards. I'd say AMD's linux support is going to be a lot more motivated than Nvidia's in the very near future.
dd_wizard
Last edited by dd_wizard; 28th June 2012 at 09:33 PM.
Reason: Corrected the article link.
|

28th June 2012, 03:04 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,241

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dd_wizard
This article may say something about the future for linux video cards. I'd say AMD's linux support is going to be a lot more motivated than Nvidia's in the very near future.
dd_wizard
|
Sorry to say but, your link seems to circle back to THIS POST.
__________________
Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...
By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!
|

28th June 2012, 08:00 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,241

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Anyone ELSE have any input on this? (before I let it fade away)
__________________
Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...
By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!
|

28th June 2012, 10:09 PM
|
 |
Gnome-gasmic by choice!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Carolina
Age: 45
Posts: 1,038

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dd_wizard
|
Interesting read. Most interesting to me...
Bear in mind that this school PC project was just a pilot, while the full fledged program aims to place a computer on every desk in China's schools and replace as much paper as possible. While the kids in the West are stuck carrying their books around, the goal in China is to have children carrying no more than one or two paper notebooks, to be replaced with tablets in near future. What is considered science fiction in the West, due to numerous interest groups - is considered a plan in China.
And I am sure at some point China will be labelled as stealing something (Linux and AMD-ATI on machines), due to their pushing forward without high priced licenses from Micro$uck, plus China school children having access to tech while U.S. kids sit in the crap that is stagnate - troll battling - proprietary tech.
My hope would be that we (here in the U.S.) would advance opportunities for our kids, but probably easier to chew on an iShiney and sling mud at other countries who offer knowledge and futures to their kids
__________________
On quest for blue smoke and red rings...
|

28th June 2012, 11:00 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,241

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dd_wizard
|
Thanks for the link - a simular story is what triggered this post.
BTW: I feel I must warn those that go to the link that there is extremely foul language in Linus's comments.
__________________
Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...
By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!
Last edited by Chilly Willy; 28th June 2012 at 11:02 PM.
|

29th June 2012, 12:21 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 142

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
It seems Linus has caused some reaction from at least one Nvidia engineer:
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/0...tent=Google+UK
Perhaps things can change. They, probably rightfully as a market leader, want to protect their intellectual property from their rivals (AMD). They make great cards that are continually rated better than their rivals in performance so for those who dual boot with windows (especially gamers), nvidia products could be an advantage.
If you just need a basic x desktop then nouveau drivers work perfectly well and are free  The new generation of cpu's often have graphics capabilities built in; negating the need altogether for a seperate graphics card, unless you need gamers performance. As for Intel I have had nothing but success with their products.
__________________
OSS - the way forward
|

29th June 2012, 01:38 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,241

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
This IS giving me (& hopefully others) a lot of food for thought for my next build / NB purchase.
Thanks to all who posted so far, & keep the info flowing! Every little bit helps.
__________________
Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...
By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!
|

29th June 2012, 02:11 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 684

|
|
|
Re: Least troublesome video card - ?
On a laptop I'd always go an Intel chip. People with those always seem to be having pretty hassle free Linux lives it would seem when it comes to mobile PC's lol.
Unfortunately I made the mistake of getting a laptop with an ATI chip..
My gaming desktop has an NVIDIA GTX460 which is working perfectly...suspending, power management and all. However it must be said, I'm using the Official NVIDIA driver blob.
For a desktop, as I like to have performance available, I'd probably still go NVIDIA in future. Seems games, particularly WINE games and what not have generally behaved better with the NVIDIA card than the ATI GPU I had previously. YMMV and all that though.
And of course if you're not a gamer, than either a NVIDIA or ATI card with the FOSS drivers would probably work fine in a desktop, where thermals/power etc are perhaps not as much of a problem. Ugh sorry if I'm rambling
__________________
OS': Arch Linux (KDE 4.10) - Fedora 17 (MATE) - Arch Linux (E17) - now Windows-free thanks Valve!
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 05:28 (Wednesday, 22-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|