 |
 |
 |
 |
| Hardware & Laptops Help with your hardware, including laptop issues |

9th May 2012, 08:59 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: virginia
Posts: 40

|
|
|
Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
Hey guys,
Not sure if this is the right sub-forum.
I'm looking to build a desktop. Should I go Intel or AMD? Which has better support by Fedora? I've been looking around and I always get mixed reviews.
My current idea of a build would use an i5 2500k in an Asrock Z68 extreme 3 gen 3 mobo with a Radeon HD 6870 graphics card. Anybody experience issues with these?
|

9th May 2012, 09:02 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,324

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
Hardware should do fine for a category.
Two pertinent questions:
How much money do you want to throw at this, and are you prepared to make the sacrifices you'll need to make to get a proper video card for the system? 'Cuz that's where the real power is going to need to be.
EDIT: My suggestion would be to avoid the Radeon. Nvidia drivers are generally a better bet in Linux.
|

9th May 2012, 09:14 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,324

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
My suggestion? Lose the Radeon, and go with this instead. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814121446
|

9th May 2012, 09:16 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: virginia
Posts: 40

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan
|
I'll do that, thanks.
So I should stick with the i5 intel based then for fedora?
|

9th May 2012, 09:34 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,324

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
Weeell, that's a matter of personal preference. My last monster was (and still is) AMD based. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=242277
That being said, if the power/heat/money wasn't an issue (which it always is) I'd probably opt for an i7. But the honest truth is, that's a lot like mounting a 1000hp turbocharged V10 in a daily-driver minivan. It'd be really cool ... but ...
... Sanity says go with the i5. <..  ..>
|

9th May 2012, 09:41 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: virginia
Posts: 40

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan
Weeell, that's a matter of personal preference. My last monster was (and still is) AMD based. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=242277
That being said, if the power/heat/money wasn't an issue (which it always is) I'd probably opt for an i7. But the honest truth is, that's a lot like mounting a 1000hp turbocharged V10 in a daily-driver minivan. It'd be really cool ... but ...
... Sanity says go with the i5. <..  ..>
|
According to benchmarks, the 8-core is better than the 2500k. Does it really consume much more power than the i5? I'm really only concerned about that, and support for linux and windows (mostly mostly linux)
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?...120+Eight-Core
|

9th May 2012, 09:53 PM
|
|
Official Gnome 3 Sales Rep. (and Adminstrator)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Age: 30
Posts: 1,857

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
I'm no gamer, but I doubt that the i7 has any real advantage over the i5 for gaming. The graphics card and drivers matter more, and as you've already been advised, like it or not, nVidia with the nVidia binary driver is unambiguously the best option for 3-D graphics performance on Linux. The alternatives either under-perform, or have horrendous driver issues (not that the nVidia blob situation is ideal...).
---------- Post added at 09:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:46 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by g2nightmare
|
I'm not sure what is being measured there. Remember that programs have to be multi-threaded with at least as many simultaneously-runnable threads as CPU-cores in order to actually benefit from extra cores. Cores beyond that will either sit idle or do occasional background tasks for the OS.
If that benchmark is measuring the performance of a single core, then fine, but if it's measuring all 8 cores, vs the i5's 4 cores, then you need to consider how many cores your games are likely to actually be able to use at once – the 8-core might be considerably slower in practise.
|

9th May 2012, 10:07 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: virginia
Posts: 40

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gareth Jones
I'm no gamer, but I doubt that the i7 has any real advantage over the i5 for gaming. The graphics card and drivers matter more, and as you've already been advised, like it or not, nVidia with the nVidia binary driver is unambiguously the best option for 3-D graphics performance on Linux. The alternatives either under-perform, or have horrendous driver issues (not that the nVidia blob situation is ideal...).
---------- Post added at 09:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:46 PM ----------
I'm not sure what is being measured there. Remember that programs have to be multi-threaded with at least as many simultaneously-runnable threads as CPU-cores in order to actually benefit from extra cores. Cores beyond that will either sit idle or do occasional background tasks for the OS.
If that benchmark is measuring the performance of a single core, then fine, but if it's measuring all 8 cores, vs the i5's 4 cores, then you need to consider how many cores your games are likely to actually be able to use at once – the 8-core might be considerably slower in practise.
|
I believe it was measuring all 8 cores, but I'm ok with that, since it's cheaper and will be better in the future. Do you know any AMD based motherboards that work very well?
Currently, my intel motherboard will be that Asrock Z68 extreme3 gen3
|

10th May 2012, 10:05 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,762

|
|
|
Re: Which has better support - Intel or AMD? Looking to build a gaming desktop
no contest ;-)
Unfortunately the performance of the new bulldozer APUs is very poor and they consume a lot of energy.
The only advantage is the built-in GPU, which you're not going to use in a gaming system.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 06:16 (Thursday, 20-06-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|