<---- template headericclude ----->
Linux Ghost Imaging?
FedoraForum.org - Fedora Support Forums and Community
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Linux Ghost Imaging?

    I'm not quite sure which forum to post this in but I'm wondering if anyone can provide a ghosting solution for my linux boxes? A few people have recommended DD but I'd like to only copy the used area. I'm not sure if what I'm asking for is possible bc I'm fairly n00b but any help would be appreciated. I'd just like to install and play with various released without having to install from scratch each time. My computer is at a good comfortable point and I'd like to be able to return to this state if/when I break it.

    Thanks,


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you can use dd for creating images of your partitions but why don't you use virtual machines if you'd like to test stuff ? It's easier to backup and it won't take a long time to do it

    Debian
    Last edited by tuxthejedi; 2nd August 2009 at 11:22 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,729
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Then grab Clonezilla.

  4. #4
    scottro's Avatar
    scottro is offline Retired Community Manager -- Banned from Texas by popular demand.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    8,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There's also good old fashioned tar.

    From old notes of mine.

    Create 2 directories somewhere, i'll say /mnt/src and /mnt/dest.
    Mount the source drive on /mnt/src. Look in etc/fstab on the drive
    and make sure you mount all partitions in the appropriate places.
    Partition and format the destination drive the way you want it, and
    mount it as /mnt/dest. Run mkswap on a swap partition (if any). If you
    are using multiple data partitions, create the mount points and mount
    those partitions.
    Run this to copy the files. There are many other commands that will
    do this; this is just the one i use since tar seems to handle device
    and other weird files acceptably:
    (cd /mnt/src ; tar -cf - .) | (cd /mnt/dest ; tar -xvpf -)
    --
    http://srobb.net

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tuxthejedi
    you can use dd for creating images of your partitions but why don't you use virtual machines if you'd like to test stuff ? It's easier to backup and it won't take a long time to do it
    thanks for all the suggestions guys. basically, i'm running a 32bit F11 machine and i'm noticing an incredible difference in VM speed from my 64bit F10 machine. so i wanted to install F11 64bit and see how well the VM runs. if it runs better then i'll stick with it because i do have to use windows for a few things. mainly microsoft office.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi

    For cloning, you could try Clonezilla (as mentioned), G4L (Ghost 4 Linux) or PING (Partimage Is Not Ghost).

    My personal favourite is G4L. The reason being is that it is fast in both backing up / restoring partitions and creates just one image file whereas the others create a folder inc. many files. From my tests, Clonezilla is by far the quickest at backing up partitions and also inc's. partclone for your ext4 partitions.

    Of the 3 mentioned, they all use partimage (for linux partitions). G4L and Clonezilla also use NTFSClone (for windows systems) but with the new ext4 fs, only Clonezilla (AFAIK) supports this system at the moment.

    Hope this helps.

    Last edited by Graham1; 1st August 2009 at 02:02 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    82
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was used g4l and clonezilla, but not good

    Ex between Windows & Linux

    Ghost Windows: ghost all file, data => small size after ghost
    Ghost Linux: ghost partition to partition => large size (so, need 1 partition = parttion linux)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It seems like, from what I've read, that Windows and NTFS has the one-up on Linux with the truncated image sizes. I'm guessing it has something to do with the way it stores data and writes information. I'm sure there are some experts here that can clarify but I'm sure it isn't because there aren't any developers around clever enough to figure it out. I'm going to try G4L.

Similar Threads

  1. How To Ghost Linux G4L vs Acronis vs Symantec Ghost vs Other
    By mrbios in forum Guides & Solutions (Not For Questions)
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 28th February 2010, 10:19 PM
  2. Imaging HardDrive in Linux
    By SyntheticShield in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 19th January 2007, 05:22 AM
  3. Partition imaging in Linux
    By macgregor in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29th May 2006, 08:51 AM
  4. Imaging for Linux (Like Norton Ghost)
    By ewdi in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 18th September 2005, 04:17 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
[[template footer(Guest)]]