 |
 |
 |
 |
| Security and Privacy Sadly, malware, spyware, hackers and privacy threats abound in today's world. Let's be paranoid and secure our penguins, and slam the doors on privacy exploits. |

13th December 2007, 10:18 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 34
Posts: 40

|
|
|
Does anyone have an easy way to limit traffic per program? I am trying to limit the upload speed in linuxdcpp, as it kills my internet connection if someone downloads from me.
I've tried trickle, but it always crashes (I tried the redhat EL4 rpm). Building trickle from source it also crashes. (seg fault after a while when I run linuxdcpp with trickle)
I cannot get the tuxguardian module to load.
Any help with a way to limit the traffic used by linuxdcpp would be appreciated.
Thanks.
|

13th December 2007, 11:35 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 438

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nomisunrider
Does anyone have an easy way to limit traffic per program?
|
Personally I wouldn't mind a solution to that problem as well.
One solution that I find has possibilities is getting the SELinux people to implement a simple on/off net access policy boolean. If an app is net enabled as you install from the repo you could possibly enable or disable net access. OK it would be an on or off solution, but with a default of off, and a check mark OK required it could add a substantial security boost.
Of course enabling this type of control would have to be an additional optional policy, but sometimes simple on/off can be quite effective, especially if the default is off.
Last edited by RJFUatHOME; 13th December 2007 at 11:41 PM.
|

13th December 2007, 11:46 PM
|
|
Clueless in a Cuckooland
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Here now, elsewhere tomorrow.
Posts: 3,929

|
|
http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en...itle=Ldcpp_FAQ
Quote:
How about bandwidth limiting?
This will only get the client banned. There are tools to do bandwidth limiting at a lower level anyway.
|
|

14th December 2007, 03:21 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 34
Posts: 40

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pete_1967
|
Thanks for your help...
If I cannot limit my bandwidth, I won't be using it anyways, as it renders my internet connection useless.
|

26th December 2007, 05:53 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 34
Posts: 40

|
|
|
Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks.
|

27th December 2007, 01:08 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 548

|
|
|
__________________
* AMD Phenom 9750, 8GB DDR-1066, Gigabyte MA770UD3, ATI X550, F12 64bit
* Dual Athlon MP2800+, Gigabyte GA-7DPXDWP, 1GB, Centos 5.4
Linux Rules
|

31st December 2007, 04:54 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 34
Posts: 40

|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bradchaus
|
I guess I should have clarified, I'm asking for suggestions in response to my post above.
Does anyone have an easy way to limit traffic per program? I am trying to limit the upload speed in linuxdcpp, as it kills my internet connection if someone downloads from me.
I've tried trickle, but it always crashes (I tried the redhat EL4 rpm). Building trickle from source it also crashes. (seg fault after a while when I run linuxdcpp with trickle)
I cannot get the tuxguardian module to load.
Any help with a way to limit the traffic used by linuxdcpp would be appreciated.
Thanks.
|

7th October 2008, 09:08 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 524

|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJFUatHOME
One solution that I find has possibilities is getting the SELinux people to implement a simple on/off net access policy boolean. If an app is net enabled as you install from the repo you could possibly enable or disable net access. OK it would be an on or off solution, but with a default of off, and a check mark OK required it could add a substantial security boost.
Of course enabling this type of control would have to be an additional optional policy, but sometimes simple on/off can be quite effective, especially if the default is off.
|
I like that idea.
I can't believe there still aren't really any viable options for outgoing firewalls on Linux. Came across this, however:
http://linuxappfinder.com/package/linux-firewall.org
The comments are rather harsh though. I agree that it would be a little hard to justify installing this program from who knows who when it is closed source. However, the argument about checksums doesn't seem like as big of a deal to me. Most binaries are owned by root anyway, right? It is not as if they are especially likely to be compromised (and if they are, you've got bigger problems). Also, the fact that the user can turn it off doesn't completely negate its usefulness (with regards to controlling (or at least observing) Internet access for most applications).
Thoughts?
Has anyone found any other solutions that are open source as well as maintained?
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Current GMT-time: 23:40 (Friday, 24-05-2013)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|