Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 23rd August 2011, 08:13 PM
AdamW's Avatar
AdamW Offline
Fedora QA Community Monkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,762
linuxfirefox
Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Starting a new thread for Alpha discussion. Note that Alpha RC5 was blessed as Alpha, so if you have Alpha RC5, there's no point re-downloading Alpha, it's the same thing.

The 'announce' post is over in the News forum. Get Alpha here, and do remember to read the release notes and common bugs.
__________________
Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
  #2  
Old 23rd August 2011, 09:48 PM
Dan's Avatar
Dan Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,309
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Well ... it fails to boot off of a USB drive here. No root device found.
__________________
Signature Links | New Posts | Who's on the forums (right now) |

© ® ™ № ¿
  #3  
Old 23rd August 2011, 10:10 PM
AdamW's Avatar
AdamW Offline
Fedora QA Community Monkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,762
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

that's very non-specific.

what image? how did you write it to the usb stick?
__________________
Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
  #4  
Old 23rd August 2011, 10:23 PM
Dan's Avatar
Dan Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,309
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Listing backwards, Fedora USB creator, and the live x86_64 image. Might be a bit too soon to condemn F16, though. F15, then F14 just failed on the same USB drive. Methinks the jump drive is toast.
__________________
Signature Links | New Posts | Who's on the forums (right now) |

© ® ™ № ¿
  #5  
Old 23rd August 2011, 11:39 PM
Dan's Avatar
Dan Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,309
linuxfedorafirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

*Sigh!*

Strike two. Both the PNY and the Toshiba failed. It's starting to look like this is going to cost me a CD.
__________________
Signature Links | New Posts | Who's on the forums (right now) |

© ® ™ № ¿
  #6  
Old 23rd August 2011, 11:47 PM
glennzo's Avatar
glennzo Online
Un-Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Salem, Mass USA
Posts: 13,929
linuxchrome
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Quote:
It's starting to look like this is going to cost me a CD
Want I should mail you a nickel Dan?
__________________
Glenn
The Bassinator © ®


Laptop: Toshiba Satellite / Intel Core 2 Duo 1.73 GHz / 2GB / 160GB / Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME/943/940GML Integrated Graphics
Desktop: BioStar MCP6PB M2+ / AMD Phenom 9750 Quad Core / 4GB / 1TB SATA / 500GB SATA / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 1GB
  #7  
Old 23rd August 2011, 11:55 PM
smr54 Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,978
linuxchrome
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Where is the custom partitioning and not putting grub in boot at at this point? As far as I understood it, RC5 is not working unless one accepts one of the default layouts, and risks putting grub in the mbr, thereby requiring me to <gasp> see how to edit a grub2 menu. Some custom file out of the 40 or so in there, right? (Not a real question, when the time comes I'll look it up.)


All kidding aside, does the latest alpha install with custom partitioning? In other words, what I've always done in the past, when trying on hardware, is to put it in a partition, just making a / partition. As per other threads (here and mailing list) at this point, one gets a somewhat cryptic message (bug has been filed, message will probably be less cryptic) saying that one must create a small BIOS partition. Also, one can't just put grub in the first partition of the install at this time.

I'd like to be clear on whether that's changed or not. As it stood, what has worked for the last few years no longer does, and I haven't seen enough on it to know if that's still the case, or one of those gosh darn Just Me(TM) problems.

Thanks.
  #8  
Old 24th August 2011, 12:24 AM
dd_wizard's Avatar
dd_wizard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,409
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

It's running fine off a live USB here. I even went to the trouble of downloading the latest evolution, evolution-NetworkManager, and evolution-data-server so I could get the updates to gnome-[menu, panel, shell], nautilus-sendto, control-center, and folks. That was a total waste of energy!
Code:
Packages Altered:
    Updated control-center-1:3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64            @fedora
    Update                 1:3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64            ?
    Updated control-center-filesystem-1:3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64 @fedora
    Update                            1:3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 ?
    Updated evolution-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64                   @fedora
    Update            3.1.5-1.fc16.x86_64                   ?
    Updated evolution-NetworkManager-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64    @fedora
    Update                           3.1.5-1.fc16.x86_64    ?
    Updated evolution-data-server-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64       @fedora
    Update                        3.1.5-1.fc16.x86_64       ?
    Updated folks-1:0.6.0-2.fc16.x86_64                     @updates-testing
    Update        1:0.6.0-4.fc16.x86_64                     ?
    Updated gnome-menus-3.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64                 @fedora
    Update              3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64                 @?updates-testing
    Updated gnome-panel-3.0.2-3.fc16.x86_64                 @fedora
    Update              3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64                 @?updates-testing
    Updated gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.x86_64            @fedora
    Update                   3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64            @?updates-testing
    Updated gnome-shell-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64                 @fedora
    Update              3.1.4-2.gite7b9933.fc16.x86_64      @?updates-testing
    Updated nautilus-sendto-1:3.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64           @fedora
    Update                  1:3.0.0-9.fc16.x86_64           ?
This version of gnome-shell crashes so often, it's pretty useless. Still no luck getting it on a hard drive, but I haven't given up yet.

dd_wizard
  #9  
Old 24th August 2011, 12:34 AM
glennzo's Avatar
glennzo Online
Un-Retired Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Salem, Mass USA
Posts: 13,929
linuxchrome
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

'nuff said. I downloaded and am burning a disk as we speak (in mid process) but I think it will just be a coaster. If I still can't install to an existing partition I'm not going to bother.
__________________
Glenn
The Bassinator © ®


Laptop: Toshiba Satellite / Intel Core 2 Duo 1.73 GHz / 2GB / 160GB / Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME/943/940GML Integrated Graphics
Desktop: BioStar MCP6PB M2+ / AMD Phenom 9750 Quad Core / 4GB / 1TB SATA / 500GB SATA / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 1GB
  #10  
Old 24th August 2011, 12:45 AM
smr54 Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,978
linuxchrome
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Well, let us know--inquiring minds anxiously await.
  #11  
Old 24th August 2011, 02:31 AM
ah7013's Avatar
ah7013 Offline
Registered "Cashew" User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 614
linuxubuntufirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Currently downloading the 32-bit GNOME Live CD to try on my old laptop. I don't currently have a USB drive on me so I am going to have to burn a CD.

---------- Post added at 01:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah7013 View Post
Currently downloading the 32-bit GNOME Live CD to try on my old laptop. I don't currently have a USB drive on me so I am going to have to burn a CD.
Well it booted OK but because of the age of the hardware (Compaq Evo N800v) GNOME shell failed to load . However fallback mode works fine.

---------- Post added at 01:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:15 PM ----------

Now downloading the KDE Live CD to test that one out as well.
__________________
Running Mageia 3 (KDE 4.10) on an ASUS K55V (Core i5, 16GB RAM, 750GB HDD, Nvidia 610M)
  #12  
Old 24th August 2011, 02:46 AM
Adrian719's Avatar
Adrian719 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 22
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

I tried to install Fedora16 Alpha a few times today, all were unsuccessful.
It would install fine, but then I would log in, and I would get a message saying: "A problem has occured, and the system can't recover. Please log out and try again".

First time I installed with:
Code:
yum install fedora-release-rawhide

yum --disablerepo=16 --enablerepo=rawhide update
That gave me the error, the first time.

So I tried:
Code:
yum update yum
yum clean all
yum --releasever=16 --disableplugin=presto distrosync --nogpgcheck
Error again.

So then for the last and final time, I tried installing from a LiveUSB (changed all isolinux to syslinux).
Same thing

So I gave up, and am now back to F15 lol.
  #13  
Old 24th August 2011, 07:10 AM
tox
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

this Nightly crashed Fedora-16-Nightly-20110823.21-i686-Live-desktop.iso, when it tried to load the shell thats when it crashed, it gave me a ( ohh no something has gone wrong and cannot recover ) i thought it was a selinux problem as the first attempt at booting into it it did give me a AVC denial, ( of what i dont know - as selinux wouldnt load to tell me the exact error. then i rebooted and loaded again with the same thing as i said, the ( ohh no something has gone wrong and cannot recover )
  #14  
Old 24th August 2011, 03:06 PM
Dan's Avatar
Dan Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 22,309
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

Quote:
dracut Warning: No root device 'live:/dev/disk/by-uuid/EA73-A471" found

Dropping to debug shell.

sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
dracut:/#
Not much I can do with that. Sadly, for me, F16 Alpha=fail.
__________________
Signature Links | New Posts | Who's on the forums (right now) |

© ® ™ № ¿
  #15  
Old 24th August 2011, 03:38 PM
pkands Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 136
linuxfirefox
Re: Fedora 16 Alpha discussion thread

"A problem has occured, and the system can't recover. Please log out and try again".

This is what I get with my laptop and desktop PC with the LIVE CD version.
This occurs when trying to load the desktop ( I think).

Last edited by pkands; 24th August 2011 at 03:58 PM.
 

Tags
alpha, discussion, fedora, thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
vendor discussion -- split from another thread. Dan Wibble 8 21st March 2010 10:03 AM
Secondary bulldozer thread discussion Dan Wibble 18 26th February 2010 08:00 PM
The Z softs discussion thread spacefrog Security and Privacy 0 16th August 2009 01:43 AM


Current GMT-time: 15:46 (Tuesday, 21-05-2013)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat