Fedora Linux Support Community & Resources Center
  #1  
Old 20th November 2008, 03:51 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Question Where can I find libdc1394.so.22()(64bit) ?

I just installed a new nVidia video card and am trying to install the Livna driver for it, but it says I am missing a dependency, libdc1394.so.22()(64bit).

I have searched and found that lots of other people have run into this, but no solutions. I have found some locations with libdc1394.so.22() but not for (64bit).

Does anyone have any idea where I can find this file so I can install my Livna driver ?

Code:
Error: Missing Dependency: libdc1394.so.22()(64bit) is needed by package ffmpeg-libs
Error: Missing Dependency: libdc1394.so.22 is needed by package ffmpeg-libs
[root@F8 oral]# yum clean all
Cleaning up Everything
[root@F8 oral]# yum update
livna                     100% |=========================| 2.1 kB    00:00
primary.sqlite.bz2        100% |=========================| 4.3 kB    00:00
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 100% |=========================| 2.7 kB    00:00
1d6d572588911216bb3dc61be 100% |=========================|  61 kB    00:02
fedora                    100% |=========================| 2.1 kB    00:00
primary.sqlite.bz2        100% |=========================| 5.8 MB    04:24
rpmfusion-free-updates    100% |=========================| 2.7 kB    00:00
61d4999fb9947e73f59853c0c 100% |=========================| 263 kB    00:10
rpmfusion-free            100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
primary.xml.gz            100% |=========================|  201 B    00:00
adobe-linux-i386          100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
primary.xml.gz            100% |=========================|  10 kB    00:00
adobe-linu: ################################################## 17/17
updates                   100% |=========================| 2.6 kB    00:00
primary.sqlite.bz2        100% |=========================| 2.2 kB    00:00
rpmfusion-nonfree         100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
primary.xml.gz            100% |=========================|  201 B    00:00
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libmad.x86_64 0:0.15.1b-8.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package unrar.x86_64 0:3.7.8-2.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package flash-plugin.i386 0:10.0.12.36-release set to be updated
---> Package x264-libs.x86_64 0:0.0.0-0.15.20080613.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package xvidcore.x86_64 0:1.1.3-4.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package faad2-libs.x86_64 1:2.6.1-6.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package fedora-release.noarch 0:8-6.transition set to be updated
---> Package a52dec.x86_64 0:0.7.4-13.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package faac.x86_64 0:1.25-7.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package lame-libs.x86_64 0:3.98.2-2.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package ffmpeg-libs.x86_64 0:0.4.9-0.48.20080908.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libdc1394.so.22()(64bit) for package: ffmpeg-libs
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libdc1394.so.22()(64bit) is needed by package ffmpeg-libs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20th November 2008, 05:22 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
I found a src.rpm version of it at http://hany.sk/~hany/RPM/f-updates-8...c8.x86_64.html

I installed it with rpm -ivv libdc1394-2.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm
and I tested by attempting to install ffmpeg

I got
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libdc1394.so.22()(64bit) is needed by package ffmpeg-libs

So it appears that even after it is installed it is still missing ?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20th November 2008, 12:56 PM
PatMcLJr Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 1,184
maybe you could compile ffmpeg from source?

I got this

Code:
svn checkout -r 11879 svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/ffmpeg/trunk ffmpeg
cd ffmpeg/ 
./configure
make 
make install 
make install-libs
from here
http://www.zoneminder.com/wiki/index.php/CentOS

Best of Luck,
Pat Jr.
__________________
x--x--x
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
Freedom is never Free.
Pat Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th November 2008, 10:53 PM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Well I found out why that after the sorce rpm was installed libdc1394.so.22()(64bit) was still missing. It seems it only installed the source files into /usr/src.

So I attempted to install with ./configure and got this:
checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes
checking for C/C++ restrict keyword... __restrict
checking for pow in -lm... yes
checking for raw1394_channel_modify in -lraw1394... no
configure: error: libraw1394 not found or too old. Please upgrade to 1.2.0 or a more recent version.
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]# make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]#

So I checked with Yumex and found that my version of libraw1394 is 1.3.0-6 which is more recent than 1.2.0.

Any ideas ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th November 2008, 11:53 PM
leigh123linux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try installing the devel


Code:
su
yum install libraw1394-devel
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21st November 2008, 12:59 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Thank you Leigh123. Actually I had tried that with Yumex, and was told that it was the wrong version. It seems that Yumex has me listed as having a newer version, 0-6, installed than the devel, 0-3, and wouldn't let me proceed.

So I tried it with yum in a terminal, and it went like this:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libraw1394 = 1.3.0-3.fc8 is needed by package libraw1394-devel
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]#

So now I'm going to uninstall libraw1394 1.3.0-6 and install libraw1394 1.3.0-3, then try again to install the devel. It seems like a good plan. I'll let you know how it turns out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21st November 2008, 01:04 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Well, here's how that grand plan played out:
Install 0 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 58 Package(s)

Is this ok [y/N]: n

Yes, I entered and n. It was about tot rip my installation's guts out
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21st November 2008, 01:13 AM
leigh123linux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try


Code:
su
rpm -e --nodeps libraw1394
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21st November 2008, 01:23 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Thank you Leigh. I was sitting here trying to find the correct syntax for yum remove libraw1394-1.3.0-6 --nodep and just wasn't having a bit of luck.

Well, we're closer. Here's what I got:
Code:
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]# rpm -e --nodeps libraw1394
error: "libraw1394" specifies multiple packages
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]# rpm -e --nodeps libraw1394-1.3.0-6
error: package libraw1394-1.3.0-6 is not installed
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]#
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21st November 2008, 01:25 AM
leigh123linux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try

Code:
su
rpm -e --nodeps --allmatches libraw1394
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21st November 2008, 01:27 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
So I entered yum list installed libraw1394 to verify what I am dealing with, and got this:
Code:
Installed Packages
libraw1394.x86_64                        1.3.0-6.fc8            installed
libraw1394.i386                          1.3.0-6.fc8            installed
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]#
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21st November 2008, 01:34 AM
leigh123linux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You could grab the devel from here

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b...?buildID=47534
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21st November 2008, 01:41 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Thank you Leigh.

So looking at the output from the list installed, there was a .386 and a .86_64. So If I left those out, like I was, how could it tell which to remove ? So I tried this:
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]# rpm -e --nodeps libraw1394.i386
[root@F8 libdc1394-2.0.2]# rpm -e --nodeps libraw1394.x86_64

and it worked

Then I told it yum install libraw1394 and it installed the 0-3 version for both .i386 and .86_64.

Then I told it yum install libraw1394-devel like you said, and it took it

Now I'm going to retry that ./configure
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21st November 2008, 02:06 AM
OralDeckard Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
And my libdc1394-2.0.2-1 ./configured, and made, and make installed.

So off I went to Yumex to get kmod-nvidia.
All went well, until it said:
Missing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.26.6-49.fc8 is needed by package kmod-nvidia-2.6.26.6-49.fc8

So updating to the latest kernel shouldn't be a problem, right ?
But yumex doesn't offer anything that high. My kernel is 2.6.25.9-40.fc8, and its green, meaning not red and urging me to upgrade.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21st November 2008, 02:11 AM
leigh123linux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try

Code:
su
yum install fedora-release
yum update


Code:
---> Package faad2-libs.x86_64 1:2.6.1-6.fc8 set to be updated
---> Package fedora-release.noarch 0:8-6.transition set to be updated
---> Package a52dec.x86_64 0:0.7.4-13.fc8 set to be updated

This should sort out all the yum problems
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
libdc1394so2264bit

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yum install libraw1394-devel & libdc1394-devel fails redawn Using Fedora 0 30th September 2008 03:30 PM
Vista 64bit and Fedora 64bit boot CrOwN. Using Fedora 6 6th July 2008 07:22 PM
Upgrading F7 64bit to F8 64bit errors out with strange error ajamison Installation, Upgrades and Live Media 3 30th December 2007 08:41 AM


Current GMT-time: 12:44 (Friday, 24-10-2014)

TopSubscribe to XML RSS for all Threads in all ForumsFedoraForumDotOrg Archive
logo

All trademarks, and forum posts in this site are property of their respective owner(s).
FedoraForum.org is privately owned and is not directly sponsored by the Fedora Project or Red Hat, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Term of Use | Posting Guidelines | Archive | Contact Us | Founding Members

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

FedoraForum is Powered by RedHat
Zorgo - Santa Barbara dOeste - Pemba Travel Photos