FedoraForum.org - Fedora Support Forums and Community
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 87
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    72
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    Quote Originally Posted by sonoran
    If I was into signatures, I would steal that line
    Actually, sir, I think I'll steal your idea and update my signature with it!
    Dave Shaw
    Registered Linux user #412525
    Dell Latitude D610 / FC13
    dshaw256@centurylink.net

    no problem is so bad that a moron with root can't make it much worse

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    you can download the RPM and use --force

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    4,333
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    shaw256: removing evolution is perfectly safe. removing evolution-data-server isn't, as various other bits of the GNOME desktop use it as a PIM data store. It should really be renamed, the evolution bit is something of a misnomer. The gnome-panel dep? If you have tasks and appointments stored in e-d-s, when you click on the clock in the panel, it'll show an expandable arrow thingy that shows the list of current tasks, and if you click on a date in the calendar for which there are any appointments, there'll be another expandable list with that day's appointments in it. The data doesn't have to be _created_ with Evo, either; I manage my tasks with the app that's just called 'tasks', but that stores them in e-d-s.

    As others have posted, this is simply a packaging error. The evolution maintainer sent out a version of evolution-data-server with a library ABI change as an update, without also rebuilding all packages which depend on e-d-s and including them in the update. Apparently, he just didn't spot the change (see the Bodhi page). Unfortunately, he also submitted the update to stable almost immediately after submitting it to testing. Several people caught the problem and filed negative feedback when it actually arrived in testing, but by then it was too late and the update was pushed to stable regardless.

    We have a couple of impending progress improvements which should mitigate this kind of problem in future. The 'proventesters' system of requiring updates to critical path packages to have positive testing feedback from a group of proven testers before they can be pushed to stable would have caught this issue, as e-d-s is a critpath package. That process should be implemented within the next few days, or next couple of weeks at least.

    The AutoQA project will also eventually implement an automated dependency check test which should prevent _any_ update being shipped if it causes new dependency issues, but that's slightly more long term, as AutoQA is a complex project with timescales of months rather than weeks...
    Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
    Fedora QA
    IRC: adamw | Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im
    http://www.happyassassin.net

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    72
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamW
    shaw256: removing evolution is perfectly safe. removing evolution-data-server isn't
    Yep. I caught that difference right after I removed the whole Gnome UI from my machine! Hey, no worries here. A learning experience.
    Dave Shaw
    Registered Linux user #412525
    Dell Latitude D610 / FC13
    dshaw256@centurylink.net

    no problem is so bad that a moron with root can't make it much worse

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,409
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    I took the precaution of making sure my IMAGE BACKUPS were up to date (before I got bit) so I can just reinstall if need be but I have to ask, are there any OTHER "gotchas" in all this mess I need to be aware of?
    Last edited by Chilly Willy; 29th June 2010 at 12:11 AM.
    Chilly Willy, Tux's little cousin...

    By its very nature, Windows is a PANE!

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    290
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem All my problems seem to be GHC dependency

    see attached file ghc.txt

    yum --skip-broken update does nothing with ghc updates because of dependenct problema.

    Many packages are successfully installed

    Skipped (dependency problems):
    PyXML.i686 0:0.8.4-17.fc13 SOAPpy.noarch 0:0.11.6-10.fc12 evolution.i686 0:2.30.2-1.fc13 evolution-data-server.i686 0:2.30.2-2.fc13
    evolution-data-server-devel.i686 0:2.30.2-2.fc13 evolution-help.noarch 0:2.30.2-1.fc13 ghc.i686 0:6.12.1-5.fc13 ghc-GLUT.i686 0:2.1.2.1-3.fc13
    ghc-GLUT-devel.i686 0:2.1.2.1-3.fc13 ghc-HTTP-devel.i686 0:4000.0.9-2.fc13 ghc-HUnit.i686 0:1.2.2.1-1.fc13 ghc-HUnit-devel.i686 0:1.2.2.1-1.fc13
    ghc-OpenGL.i686 0:2.2.3.0-1.fc13 ghc-OpenGL-devel.i686 0:2.2.3.0-1.fc13 ghc-QuickCheck.i686 0:2.1.0.3-1.fc13 ghc-QuickCheck-devel.i686 0:2.1.0.3-1.fc13
    ghc-cgi.i686 0:3001.1.7.2-2.fc13 ghc-cgi-devel.i686 0:3001.1.7.2-2.fc13 ghc-deepseq.i686 0:1.1.0.0-1.fc13 ghc-deepseq-devel.i686 0:1.1.0.0-1.fc13
    ghc-doc.i686 0:6.12.1-5.fc13 ghc-editline.i686 0:0.2.1.0-14.fc13 ghc-editline-devel.i686 0:0.2.1.0-14.fc13 ghc-fgl.i686 0:5.4.2.2-4.fc13
    ghc-fgl-devel.i686 0:5.4.2.2-4.fc13 ghc-ghc.i686 0:6.12.1-5.fc13 ghc-ghc-devel.i686 0:6.12.1-5.fc13 ghc-haskell-platform.i686 0:2010.1.0.0-1.fc13
    ghc-haskell-platform-devel.i686 0:2010.1.0.0-1.fc13 ghc-haskell-src.i686 0:1.0.1.3-3.fc13 ghc-haskell-src-devel.i686 0:1.0.1.3-3.fc13 ghc-html.i686 0:1.0.1.2-2.fc13
    ghc-html-devel.i686 0:1.0.1.2-2.fc13 ghc-mtl-devel.i686 0:1.1.0.2-5.fc13 ghc-network-devel.i686 0:2.2.1.7-1.fc13 ghc-parallel.i686 0:2.2.0.1-1.fc13
    ghc-parallel-devel.i686 0:2.2.0.1-1.fc13 ghc-parsec-devel.i686 0:2.1.0.1-2.fc13 ghc-regex-base.i686 0:0.93.1-2.fc13 ghc-regex-base-devel.i686 0:0.93.1-2.fc13
    ghc-regex-compat.i686 0:0.92-2.fc13 ghc-regex-compat-devel.i686 0:0.92-2.fc13 ghc-regex-posix.i686 0:0.94.1-2.fc13 ghc-regex-posix-devel.i686 0:0.94.1-2.fc13
    ghc-stm.i686 0:2.1.1.2-2.fc13 ghc-stm-devel.i686 0:2.1.1.2-2.fc13 ghc-utf8-string.i686 0:0.3.6-3.fc13 ghc-utf8-string-devel.i686 0:0.3.6-3.fc13
    ghc-xhtml.i686 0:3000.2.0.1-2.fc13 ghc-xhtml-devel.i686 0:3000.2.0.1-2.fc13 ghc-zlib-devel.i686 0:0.5.2.0-1.fc13 mutter-mbl.i686 0:2.28.1_0.12-1.fc13
    mutter-moblin.i686 0:0.43.8-4.fc13 python-fpconst.noarch 0:0.7.3-6.fc12 python-twisted-core.i686 0:8.2.0-5.fc13 python-twisted-web.i686 0:8.2.0-3.fc12
    python-zope-filesystem.i686 0:1-4.fc12 python-zope-interface.i686 0:3.5.2-2.fc12 syncevolution.i686 1:1.0-2.fc13 syncevolution-libs.i686 1:1.0-2.fc13
    syncevolution-moblin.i686 1:1.0-2.fc13
    Attached Files Attached Files

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    Quote Originally Posted by glennzo
    libedataserver.x0.x0.32.blahblah is part of evolution-data-server.
    Code:
    [glenn@phenom13 ~>$ yum provides */libedataserver-1.2.so.11
    Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto, refresh-packagekit
    Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
     * fedora: fedora.mirror.iweb.ca
     * rpmfusion-free: mirror.liberty.edu
     * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.liberty.edu
     * rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.liberty.edu
     * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.liberty.edu
     * updates: mirror.cogentco.com
    evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13.i686 : Backend data server for Evolution
    Repo        : installed
    Matched from:
    Filename    : /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.11
    Code:
    [glenn@phenom13 ~>$ yum list evolution*
    Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto, refresh-packagekit
    Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
    updates/metalink                                         |  14 kB     00:00
     * fedora: fedora.mirror.iweb.ca
     * rpmfusion-free: mirror.liberty.edu
     * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.liberty.edu
     * rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.liberty.edu
     * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.liberty.edu
     * updates: fedora.mirror.iweb.ca
    rpmfusion-free-updates                                   | 2.8 kB     00:00
    rpmfusion-nonfree-updates                                | 2.8 kB     00:00
    Installed Packages
    evolution-data-server.i686 2.30.1-2.fc13 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201005130056.i386
    I would imagine that you should be able to install evolution-data-server by itself. Anyone care to try?


    Here's what worked for me:

    [root@mysystem] # yum downgrade evolution-data-server
    ================================================== ========================================
    Package Arch Version Repository Size
    ================================================== ========================================
    Downgrading:
    evolution-data-server x86_64 2.30.1-2.fc13 fedora 2.5 M
    Removing for dependencies:
    evolution x86_64 2.30.2-1.fc13 @updates 37 M

    Transaction Summary
    ================================================== ========================================
    Remove 1 Package(s)
    Reinstall 0 Package(s)
    Downgrade 1 Package(s)

    Removed:
    evolution-data-server.x86_64 0:2.30.2-2.fc13

    Dependency Removed:
    evolution.x86_64 0:2.30.2-1.fc13

    Installed:
    evolution-data-server.x86_64 0:2.30.1-2.fc13

    [root@mysystem] # yum install gnome-panel
    ================================================== =====================================
    Package Arch Version Repository Size
    ================================================== ========================================
    Installing:
    gnome-panel x86_64 2.30.0-1.fc13 fedora 1.9 M

    Transaction Summary
    ================================================== ========================================
    Install 1 Package(s)
    Upgrade 0 Package(s)

    Total download size: 1.9 M
    Installed size: 9.8 M
    Is this ok [y/N]: y

    EDITED /etc/yum.conf
    exclude=evolution-data-server


    Now if I can post after dumping KDE and getting back to gnome, I will be happy. Thanks also to "GoinEasy"

    ---------- Post added at 04:17 PM CDT ---------- Previous post was at 04:13 PM CDT ----------

    YAY! I have gnome back!!! No more wrestling with KDE and NetworkManager!!!!! No wonder Linus Torvalds dumped KDE!!!! (not trying to turn this into a gnome vs KDE thing..., just happy).

    SEE POST #57 BELOW BY ADAMW
    Last edited by gid99; 30th June 2010 at 11:40 PM.
    someone@somesystem # cat /etc/passwd | grep :99

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    72
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    Quote Originally Posted by gid99
    Here's what worked for me:
    Brilliant! Worked for me as well.

    Thank you, sir, for the work-around.
    Dave Shaw
    Registered Linux user #412525
    Dell Latitude D610 / FC13
    dshaw256@centurylink.net

    no problem is so bad that a moron with root can't make it much worse

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,743
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    The problem has been fixed. At least with my mirror there is no longer a dependency issue.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    Quote Originally Posted by CSchwangler
    The problem has been fixed. At least with my mirror there is no longer a dependency issue.
    No it's not fixed, bug still seems open

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608212

  11. #56
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Posts
    209
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    Quote Originally Posted by gid99
    Here's what worked for me:

    [root@mysystem] # yum downgrade evolution-data-server
    Had tried something like this before (Not the downgrade command though) which didn't work. This seems to be working... I'm installing Gnome-panel. Let's see how it goes.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Okay, this has worked. Thanks gid!
    Now installing other dependencies that were lost. Everything seems to work though.
    Last edited by AceRoom; 29th June 2010 at 05:51 PM. Reason: Finished the Install
    Fedora 17 (Beefy Miracle) | Windows 7 Professional | Linux Mint 13 Cinnamon (Maya)

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    4,333
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    some of the dependent packages have now been rebuilt, and some have not yet. there's also the question of the updates getting from updates-testing to updates. so depending on which packages you have installed, which mirror you're using, and whether you have 'updates-testing' enabled, the issue may appear 'fixed' for you or not. it's likely to vary from person to person.

    The ghc issue is a separate (but similar) issue. Another case of a badly-handled incompatible update.
    Adam Williamson | awilliam AT redhat DOT com
    Fedora QA
    IRC: adamw | Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im
    http://www.happyassassin.net

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Dublin,Ireland
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    evolution-data-server issue is no more (for me). All is fine now.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    This problem has been resolved by the upstream package maintainer/developer (I think it was today)

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: new update problem

    whoops. deleted
    Last edited by gid99; 30th June 2010 at 11:41 PM.
    someone@somesystem # cat /etc/passwd | grep :99

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Yum update problem.
    By Reglash in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 3rd October 2008, 06:29 AM
  2. Update Problem
    By lplp2 in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 9th September 2005, 06:48 PM
  3. Amarok Update Problem from yum -y update
    By Raafi in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26th August 2005, 11:23 PM
  4. yum update problem
    By decrypt in forum Using Fedora
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 7th October 2004, 08:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •