slacy
26th April 2005, 10:55 AM
Am I the only one who's feeling the pain of them not including cyrus-imapd in FC4T2?
I got screwed when they removed the "vanilla" imapd from FC1 and replaced it with cyrus in FC2. I thought they had decided to commit to cyrus, but I guess not. Now they expect me to move my entire site from cyrus to dovecot?
I tried compiling cyrus-imapd, but it doesn't seem to compile under gcc-4.0. I suppose this is one of their criteria for not including it. This is really rediculous policy: Let's go with everything hyper cutting-edge, and anything that doesn't work, we'll just toss it out of the distro. Our users won't mind! Oh, and by the way, we won't tell them that we're tossing required packages until their system boots up and dies in mysterious ways. No warning, no info, no nothing, just a non-functional machine.
At this point, it would be easier to switch to another distro than switch to dovecot. I used to love RH and FC, and now I pretty much despise them.
Anyone else feel the same?
I got screwed when they removed the "vanilla" imapd from FC1 and replaced it with cyrus in FC2. I thought they had decided to commit to cyrus, but I guess not. Now they expect me to move my entire site from cyrus to dovecot?
I tried compiling cyrus-imapd, but it doesn't seem to compile under gcc-4.0. I suppose this is one of their criteria for not including it. This is really rediculous policy: Let's go with everything hyper cutting-edge, and anything that doesn't work, we'll just toss it out of the distro. Our users won't mind! Oh, and by the way, we won't tell them that we're tossing required packages until their system boots up and dies in mysterious ways. No warning, no info, no nothing, just a non-functional machine.
At this point, it would be easier to switch to another distro than switch to dovecot. I used to love RH and FC, and now I pretty much despise them.
Anyone else feel the same?
