crackers
2004-06-02, 12:33 AM CDT
Gareth shows that he actually can write more that one-liners at http://www.madpenguin.org/cms/html/47/1570.html
Overall, I would tend to agree that FC2 is a leap above FC1, but I wouldn't trust a production (or a novice user) with it: there's just too many major/minor tweaks that you have to do to get a fully-functional system. Which is to be expected, since there were so many major changes (kernel, alsa, etc.)
My other biggest "gripe:" some of us do not like BlueCurve. I appreciate the effort into making a unifying desktop environment, but my personal opinion is that the icons look like badly drawn cartoons. I was a bit dismayed that OpenOffice was tweaked with BlueCurve icons. It's not going to stop me from using it, but I don't have to like it... :D
Overall, I would tend to agree that FC2 is a leap above FC1, but I wouldn't trust a production (or a novice user) with it: there's just too many major/minor tweaks that you have to do to get a fully-functional system. Which is to be expected, since there were so many major changes (kernel, alsa, etc.)
My other biggest "gripe:" some of us do not like BlueCurve. I appreciate the effort into making a unifying desktop environment, but my personal opinion is that the icons look like badly drawn cartoons. I was a bit dismayed that OpenOffice was tweaked with BlueCurve icons. It's not going to stop me from using it, but I don't have to like it... :D