F14 TC1 Available

[tox]

http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/iso/ 32Bit 09-Sep-2010

http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/x86_64/iso/ 64bit 09-Sep-2010

get LiveCD Images from Here (http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/)

[taytong888]

Hi,

Did you actually mean RC1, not TC1? In any case, the links you gave show FC14 betas only.

[tox]

Hi,

Did you actually mean RC1, not TC1? In any case, the links you gave show FC14 betas only.

No, i meant TC , this is where i got it, http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-September/142755.html

http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/iso/ its a TC of the BETA

[taytong888]

Hi,

I guess TC = Test Candidate?

If I am not mistaken, in openSUSE there are a number of milestone releases before one get to beta(s) then release candidates (RCs). What about Fedora?

[tox]

Hi,

I guess TC = Test Candidate?

If I am not mistaken, in openSUSE there are a number of milestone releases before one get to beta(s) then release candidates (RCs). What about Fedora?

yes, TC means TEST CANDIDATE. which means its a Pre- Test Candidate before the final Beta. Fedora is a 6month cycle release, its different from OpenSuse.

[ultra magnus]

Thanks, installing later today :)

[leigh123linux]

I tried to install it in Vmware Workstation (I don't use Vbox because it's performance sucks) and it failed due to a kickstart file error.

[ultra magnus]

thanks for the heads up, maybe I'll try it on kvm before I attempt a bare metal install.

---------- Post added at 05:11 AM CDT ---------- Previous post was at 04:34 AM CDT ----------

install went fine, kde x86_64, however it fails to boot, stop after enabling swap.

[leigh123linux]

I tried to install it in Vmware Workstation (I don't use Vbox because it's performance sucks) and it failed due to a kickstart file error.

I managed to install it after changing the vm settings.

[tox]

http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC1/Fedora/i386/iso/ 17-Sep-2010

http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/ 17-Sep-2010
however i dont see a RC1 LiveCD

[tox]

http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC2/ 18-Sep-2010

Note: there is now a LiveCD available LiveCD is now up

[motnahp00]

I was unsuccessful running F14 in VirtualBox. It pretty much croaks with a black screen while running the loader.

[tox]

I was unsuccessful running F14 in VirtualBox. It pretty much croaks with a black screen while running the loader.

did you try RC2?

[struberg]

I have problems with suspending my Notebook (Sony Vaio VGN-SR21; 8400; ATI HD3400 rv620). I guess it's something radeon-drm + xf86-video-ati related because it used to work until kernel-2.6.35-rc3

[motnahp00]

Hello dexta,

No but I'm downloading the beta version now and will try again today.

[dwightpaige79]

Downloaded from:

http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC2/

and disturbingly got:

$ gpg --verify Fedora-13-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM
gpg: Signature made Wed 19 May 2010 07:53:08 PM CDT using RSA key ID E8E40FDE
gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (13) <fedora@fedoraproject.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 8E5F 73FF 2A18 1765 4D35 8FCA 7EDC 6AD6 E8E4 0FDE

$ gpg --verify Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-CHECKSUM
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: the signature could not be verified.
Please remember that the signature file (.sig or .asc)
should be the first file given on the command line.

$ gpg --verify Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: the signature could not be verified.
Please remember that the signature file (.sig or .asc)
should be the first file given on the command line.

$ sha256sum -c Fedora-13-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM
Fedora-13-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: OK

$ sha256sum -c Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-CHECKSUM
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso: FAILED
sha256sum: Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc1.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc1.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc2.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc2.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc3.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc3.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc4.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc4.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc5.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-disc5.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-netinst.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-netinst.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: WARNING: 6 of 7 listed files could not be read
sha256sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 computed checksum did NOT match

$ sha256sum -c Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM
sha256sum: Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: No such file or directory
Fedora-14-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso: FAILED open or read
sha256sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 listed file could not be read

Included the F-13-Live-KDE results for comparison.

[motnahp00]

I cannot get either alpha or beta versions of Fedora 14 to run in VirtualBox.

[shadesia]

about this beta version, does it support core i3 processor?
i've tried in f13 and that couldn't help.
now i'm with this windows and f12.

[tox]

about this beta version, does it support core i3 processor?
i've tried in f13 and that couldn't help.
now i'm with this windows and f12.

there is no reason why it wouldnt support the i3 Processor, how did F13 didnt help? F12 uses the 2.6.32 kernel, so if F13 and F14 uses a Newer Kernel with updated drivers it will support that Processor. however you dont really say why F13 didnt help?

---------- Post added at 05:44 PM CDT ---------- Previous post was at 05:43 PM CDT ----------

as far as im aware of the i3 Processor has integrated Graphics, maybe it was a Graphics issue?

[shadesia]

there is no reason why it wouldnt support the i3 Processor, how did F13 didnt help? F12 uses the 2.6.32 kernel, so if F13 and F14 uses a Newer Kernel with updated drivers it will support that Processor. however you dont really say why F13 didnt help?

I agree that f13 or 14 using newer kernel, that's understood but still I cant understand why if I do install f13, when rebooting, something like bridge at 0x00-somewhat unread or undetected or somewhat again. that's not good then I try f14 dvd i386, this is the worst. after 'waiting hardware to initialize' or something like this, I just see a blank screen in my laptop.
I'm still looking why this thing happens again and again. even in vm-ware, f14 dvd i386 is no go. :confused: :confused: :confused:

[tox]

I agree that f13 or 14 using newer kernel, that's understood but still I cant understand why if I do install f13, when rebooting, something like bridge at 0x00-somewhat unread or undetected or somewhat again. that's not good then I try f14 dvd i386, this is the worst. after 'waiting hardware to initialize' or something like this, I just see a blank screen in my laptop.
I'm still looking why this thing happens again and again. even in vm-ware, f14 dvd i386 is no go. :confused: :confused: :confused:

have you tried Ubuntu 10.10? it also uses the 2.6.35 kernel an X-Server 1.9.0

[shadesia]

have you tried Ubuntu 10.10? it also uses the 2.6.35 kernel an X-Server 1.9.0

not yet, I'm still in downloading it. ubuntu 10.04 works well for me, but it'wastes my battery faster. then only works to me until now is just opensuse 11.2 and 11.3.

[diamond_ramsey]

I cannot get either alpha or beta versions of Fedora 14 to run in VirtualBox.

I was able to get the Beta Fedora 14 to run in my VMware server's system.

Did you get some error?

[tox]

not yet, I'm still in downloading it. ubuntu 10.04 works well for me, but it'wastes my battery faster. then only works to me until now is just opensuse 11.2 and 11.3.

it could well be a Graphics problem your having? im not sure.

[motnahp00]

The background for F14 is terrible. Brown spots look like my monitor needs a touch of Windex and a good wipe.

[tox]

ok i just tested the LiveCD an works 'ok' however when i went to startup Gnome-Shell from Desktop Effects it told me i didnt have any 3D hardware :p, but my Nightly Compose dated 8/9/2010 works fine.

[baobab]

About virtualbox , work for me as guest at initlevel 3 (on a fedora 11 host), but the x is crashing and crashing hard :( , surely an incompatibility with X server 1.9 but i've been able to build the guest kernel module :confused: .

no support for now :( (http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=34083)

[ultra magnus]

KDE x86_64 beta rc3 installed on desktop and laptop.
desktop still suffering from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625894 (nvidia card), the patch in coment #8 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625894#c8) helps.
For any other 9500gt users: desktop effects with nouveau works now!, mesa-dri-drivers-experimental. :D

[tox]

Fedora14 RC3 i386 (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC3/Fedora/i386/iso/)

F14 RC3 64bit (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC3/Fedora/x86_64/iso/)

F14 RC3 LiveCD (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.RC3/Live/)

---------- Post added at 04:04 PM CDT ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 AM CDT ----------

this RC3 isnt any better than RC2, Gnome-shell does not work as it alledges i have no 3D drivers installed which i do, the opensource one

[tox]

32bit DVD & netinst (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1.1/Fedora/i386/iso/)

64bit DvD & netinst (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1.1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/)

Live Images (http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1.1/Live/)

Can anyone Boot either the CD or DvD?
the liveCD wont boot for me at all

[MorphingDragon]

Excuse my ignorance but... WTH does TC mean?

[Wayne]

"Test Compose" but I would have guessed "Test Case" ;)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Beta_TC_Test_Results

[mwesten]

Can anyone Boot either the CD or DvD?
the liveCD wont boot for me at all

Yes. Fedora-14-i686-Live-Desktop.iso boots fine for me.

[tox]

Yes. Fedora-14-i686-Live-Desktop.iso boots fine for me.

it gets as far as trying to get into plymouth then stops

[mwesten]

it gets as far as trying to get into plymouth then stops

I get a gray screen there for a few seconds, but it doesn't stop.

[ovadyah]

I had a problem awhile back when I downloaded from the nightly compose site....they did not boot correctly.
The download of the 64bit here worked just fine,,,,,,4 times:D
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1.1/Live/

[AdamW]

If you folks could help with the validation testing it'd really help...feedback in the forums is good but validation results are better :)

desktop testing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Final_TC1_Desktop
installation testing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Final_TC1_Install

it's pretty easy - get the TC images, look at the test cases, run them, and fill out the results tables on the Wiki pages. Let me know if you have questions or problems. It'd be really great to have some help with the desktop validation tests. Thanks!

[tox]

64bit DvD's (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.RC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/)

32bit DvD's (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.RC1/Fedora/i386/iso/)

Live Images (http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.RC1/Live/)

Fedora14 RC1 Final Available

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test

[sonoran]

Just installed the RC1 Final x86_64 Live Desktop - very smooth. Going to try to do some of their tests and help out before it updates. The only change I see so far from the TC 1.1 is that the wild splash image goes to a more reasonable blue desktop background when you log in.

Very impressed so far.

Oops - wrong again. Only when running from the cd does the desktop change. After you're installed to disk the background still looks like something just smashed your windshield.

[kkshethin]

Installed live image ( http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.RC1/Live/Fedora-14-i686-Live-Desktop/) on 8GB USB Drive with 2400MB persistent space. booted. no problem. booting screen--"looks like something just smashed your windshield" as stated by sonoran. In system>administration new thing is LVM management. Two screens took time to close. first is calculator and second is Firefox.

[AdamW]

Just installed the RC1 Final x86_64 Live Desktop - very smooth. Going to try to do some of their tests and help out before it updates. The only change I see so far from the TC 1.1 is that the wild splash image goes to a more reasonable blue desktop background when you log in.

Very impressed so far.

Oops - wrong again. Only when running from the cd does the desktop change. After you're installed to disk the background still looks like something just smashed your windshield.

That's because it's a bug. =) The smashed windshield is the F14 background. There was a bug in the initial RC1 live images which meant the background didn't display when booted live (sometimes). It's fixed in the re-spun live images we uploaded recently.

[ddkay]

I'm getting this error on boot after installing /stage/14.RC1/Live/Fedora-14-x86_64-Live-Security/Fedora-14-x86_64-Live-Security.iso to disk:

http://i.imgur.com/YWmcm.png