koji log vs. missing builds?

[SlowJet]

Changelog * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0:3.4.0-0.41.1 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 17 2009 Guenther Deschner <gdeschner@redhat.com> - 3.4.0-0.41 - Fix Bug #6551 (vuid and tid not set in sessionsetupX and tconX) - Specify required talloc and tdb version for BuildRequires
* Fri Jul 03 2009 Guenther Deschner <gdeschner@redhat.com> - 3.4.0-0.40 - Update to 3.4.0
* Fri Jun 19 2009 Guenther Deschner <gdeschner@redhat.com> - 3.4.0rc1-0.39 - Update to 3.4.0rc1
* Mon Jun 08 2009 Guenther Deschner <gdeschner@redhat.com> - 3.4.0pre2-0.38 - Update to 3.4.0pre2
* Thu Apr 30 2009 Guenther Deschner <gdeschner@redhat.com> - 3.4.0pre1-0.37 - Update to 3.4.0pre1

41 never showed up so for 25 days no samba share.

rc1, pre2 never showed up - no testing on these for a month.

??????

SJ

[nirik]

The rc1/pre2 might have been when there were mirror issues?

The rebuilt -0.41.1 version is part of the currently ongoing mass rebuild.
All those builds are being done in a seperate tag, and once complete will be added to rawhide at the same time.

Expect that likely tomorrow...

[SlowJet]

koji doesn't have mirrors, the builds are shown in the 41.1 log but those builds mentions are not in koji.
They could be in a diff tag, but that would be pointless and a waste of compile time as no one could ever test the package. There is no reason to compile samba if it is not going to be released to rawhide.
I have 41.1 installed and it still get the same error are pre1.or 0 version.
What would happen if this were Firefox 3.n?
Or KDE or mono or ntfs-ng or a stinking kernel kmod?
The dev's don't have priorities straight for testing rawhide from the end user's perspective.
It's driven by ignorant demanding kids and head in the ground compile junkies.

SJ