BobNutfield
7th April 2009, 07:53 PM
Hello Everyone,
I have auxilliary laptop that I use as a workhorse on the move. I have been running F9 on it for several months and it worked satisfactorily. Knowing that F9 will no longer be supported sometime soon after F11 is released, I used Preupgrade and went ahead and upgraded to F10. The upgrade went fine, but there are little niggly issues that are more of an irritant than they are serious (Firefox fonts, etc.) But my main problem is that the lappy runs considerably slower now using no heavy graphics. Even screensavers just crawl now. The specs are:
Celeron M 1.4Ghz processor
1.5G memory
Intel 82852/855GM graphics
Overall, not the most powerful system, but I certainly thought it was meaty enough to run Fedora with a little pep. It has in the past, until F10.
My question is: I have read the release notes on F11 and I know faster boot times are a goal and greater general overall speed. Is it anyone's opinion that I can realize a speed increase with F11 using this laptop, or has Fedora just outgrown these specs to expect any degree of speed? I have even tried the live CD, but I know I can not get a true picture of the real performance I will get from a live CD. If I am not likely to realize any better speed performance, I will either stick with F10 for now or consider Slackware as a replacement. I would prefer to keep Fedora, but I need a little more speed.
Thanks for any thoughts
Bob
I have auxilliary laptop that I use as a workhorse on the move. I have been running F9 on it for several months and it worked satisfactorily. Knowing that F9 will no longer be supported sometime soon after F11 is released, I used Preupgrade and went ahead and upgraded to F10. The upgrade went fine, but there are little niggly issues that are more of an irritant than they are serious (Firefox fonts, etc.) But my main problem is that the lappy runs considerably slower now using no heavy graphics. Even screensavers just crawl now. The specs are:
Celeron M 1.4Ghz processor
1.5G memory
Intel 82852/855GM graphics
Overall, not the most powerful system, but I certainly thought it was meaty enough to run Fedora with a little pep. It has in the past, until F10.
My question is: I have read the release notes on F11 and I know faster boot times are a goal and greater general overall speed. Is it anyone's opinion that I can realize a speed increase with F11 using this laptop, or has Fedora just outgrown these specs to expect any degree of speed? I have even tried the live CD, but I know I can not get a true picture of the real performance I will get from a live CD. If I am not likely to realize any better speed performance, I will either stick with F10 for now or consider Slackware as a replacement. I would prefer to keep Fedora, but I need a little more speed.
Thanks for any thoughts
Bob