PDA

View Full Version : Fedora Core 7 MPlayer ploblem =\


perdimonokl
29th July 2007, 10:01 AM
Hello. Have installed MPlayer with GUI and i can't watch videos. I don't know how solve this problem. Search in forum and google and does't find anithing what can help's me to solve this.

This error occours when i try whatch video

[root@localhost Download]# gmplayer
MPlayer 1.0rc1-4.1.2 (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz (Family: 15, Model: 2, Stepping: 9)
CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 0 3DNow2: 0 SSE: 1 SSE2: 1
Compiled for x86 CPU with extensions: MMX MMX2 SSE SSE2

Playing /mnt/Dump/Adio-Tour-Cheboksary.mpg.
MPEG-PS file format detected.
VIDEO: MPEG2 320x256 (aspect 2) 24.000 fps 700.0 kbps (87.5 kbyte/s)
It seems there is no Xvideo support for your video card available.
Run 'xvinfo' to verify its Xv support and read DOCS/HTML/en/video.html#xv!
See 'mplayer -vo help' for other (non-xv) video out drivers. Try -vo x11
Error opening/initializing the selected video_out (-vo) device.


Exiting... (Quit)

After xvifo i have this
[root@localhost Download]# xvinfo
X-Video Extension version 2.2
screen #0
no adaptors present

But yesterday i've finally installed ati 8.39.4 drivers from official site, have some problems with this but drivers working

[root@localhost Download]# glxgears
20958 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4191.449 FPS
23082 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4615.775 FPS
23089 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4617.745 FPS
23077 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4615.325 FPS

[root@localhost Download]# fgl_glxgears
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
3346 frames in 5.0 seconds = 669.200 FPS
3837 frames in 5.0 seconds = 767.400 FPS
3931 frames in 5.0 seconds = 786.200 FPS
3941 frames in 5.0 seconds = 788.200 FPS

[root@localhost Download]# glxinfo | grep render
direct rendering: Yes
GLX_ATI_pixel_format_float, GLX_ATI_render_texture
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON 9800 PRO

[root@localhost Download]# fglrxinfo
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON 9800 PRO
OpenGL version string: 2.0.6650 (8.39.4)

But still have a problem with this
[root@localhost Download]# aticonfig --initial
Found fglrx primary device section
Nothing to do, terminating.

And may be because of this bug video doesn't playing??? :confused:

[root@localhost Download]# uname -r
2.6.21-1.3194.fc7

I'm really don't know how fix it. May be you have this problem before or you know some about this bug.
Please help :)

ppesci
29th July 2007, 10:13 AM
Your kernel looks old, as root, try:

yum -y update

You will want to add the livna repo that has support for ati drivers in a more compatible way, but first, try to uninstall the fglrx rpms that you installed and then use pirut to install fglrx from livna.

HTH

leigh123linux
29th July 2007, 12:04 PM

try selecting the gl driver in mplayer instead of xv

leigh123linux
29th July 2007, 12:05 PM
Your kernel looks old, as root, try:

yum -y update

You will want to add the livna repo that has support for ati drivers in a more compatible way, but first, try to uninstall the fglrx rpms that you installed and then use pirut to install fglrx from livna.

HTH


Why ? ( there is no need )



I guess you will think my kernel is old then !!! ( the newer kernels aren't so great )


[root@localhost ~]# uname -r
2.6.18-1.2798.fc7
[root@localhost ~]#

LocutusOfBorg
29th July 2007, 12:53 PM
Section "Device"
Identifier "Videocard0"
Driver "fglrx"
VendorName "Videocard vendor"
BoardName "ATI Technologies Inc RV410 [Radeon X700 Pro (PCIE)]"
Option "VideoOverlay" "on"
#Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "OpenGLOverlay" "off"
EndSection

Section "Extensions"
Option "Composite" "Disable"
EndSection
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "AIGLX" "off"
EndSection

ppesci
29th July 2007, 05:50 PM
Leigh:

Is better to get the rpms from livna than install from ati, because there is a better chance to not have trouble. In example, before the las release of fglrx driver, you can generate the rpms for F7 from ati and it doesn't work. You post the fix in the forum, remember? :)

I agree with you with no new kernel is a better kernel but the kernel version sowed by perdimonokl is the original kernel for F7 and since then, some fixes has be done in the distribution. Is better to update

leigh123linux
29th July 2007, 06:39 PM
Leigh:

Is better to get the rpms from livna than install from ati, because there is a better chance to not have trouble. In example, before the las release of fglrx driver, you can generate the rpms for F7 from ati and it doesn't work. You post the fix in the forum, remember? :)

I agree with you with no new kernel is a better kernel but the kernel version sowed by perdimonokl is the original kernel for F7 and since then, some fixes has be done in the distribution. Is better to update


I like Livna :cool: as you can see I am collecting kmods :D

Installed Packages
kernel.x86_64 2.6.22.1-27.fc7 installed
kernel.x86_64 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 installed
kernel.x86_64 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 installed
kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-1.2798.fc7 installed
kmod-ndiswrapper.x86_64 1.46-1.2.6.21_1.3228.f installed
kmod-ndiswrapper.x86_64 1.46-1.2.6.22.1_27.fc7 installed
kmod-ndiswrapper.x86_64 1.46-1.2.6.18_1.2798.f installed
kmod-ndiswrapper.x86_64 1.46-1.2.6.22.1_33.fc7 installed
kmod-nvidia.x86_64 100.14.11-1.2.6.21_1.3 installed
kmod-nvidia.x86_64 100.14.11-1.2.6.22.1_2 installed
kmod-nvidia.x86_64 100.14.11-1.2.6.18_1.2 installed
kmod-nvidia.x86_64 100.14.11-1.2.6.22.1_3 installed
Available Packages

perdimonokl
30th July 2007, 05:57 AM
try selecting the gl driver in mplayer instead of xv

It helps and was easy :) i thought it will be harder to solve this.

Thx for all