View Full Version : SiI3512 support?
twgray
19th April 2004, 08:25 PM
Is there a howto for customizing the installation cd? I would like to add the patch for siI3512 SATA, so that I can install on my SATA drive.
ewdi
22nd April 2004, 03:19 PM
i did it by creating a boot floppy with patched kernel boot.
twgray
22nd April 2004, 04:23 PM
Thanks. I had hoped to respin the install cd since I don't have a floppy drive.
RitzUK
11th May 2004, 09:33 PM
That's exactly what i'm after, I have an AMD64 with a SATA hard disk using those drivers. You wouldn't have a shuttle, would you? ;)
twgray
11th May 2004, 09:45 PM
Yes, I have a shuttle with a 200GB Maxtor SATA hard drive. I currently have Gentoo64 on it, but would like to try Fedora. No luck so far. I guess I could install on an ide drive, recompile kernel with the siI3512 patches, and then copy it to the SATA...but by the time I've done all that, I may as well stay with Gentoo.
ewdi
11th May 2004, 10:21 PM
core 2 will have the support for it, the only with core one is creating a boot disk iumage with patched boot kernel
Bana
12th May 2004, 02:44 PM
http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1852&highlight=3512 There are instructions at the link in this thread.
cray
13th May 2004, 05:47 AM
Originally posted by Bana
http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1852&highlight=3512 There are instructions at the link in this thread.
Hi, I have looked thru Comment #3 from dijuremo about modifying the initrd.img on the iso on the thread on Bugzilla Bug 121834. However, I cannot seem to understand how I can replace the old image by a new one we create on point 4, specifically:
cp -rp /tmp/newinitrd.img /tmp/FC2T3/isolinux/initrd.img
I expect mounting the original iso as a loop back not to make it writable.
Care to shed a light here?? Thanks!
twgray
13th May 2004, 03:47 PM
I found it to be read-only after mounting iso. Ultimately had to copy all of cd into a temp directory, make modifications, then re-create iso image with mkisofs. Mount-iso or kiso are 'easier' to use than mkisofs, if you aren't familiar with it.
cray
13th May 2004, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by twgray
I found it to be read-only after mounting iso. Ultimately had to copy all of cd into a temp directory, make modifications, then re-create iso image with mkisofs. Mount-iso or kiso are 'easier' to use than mkisofs, if you aren't familiar with it.
yah..looking at it, you'll probably have to copy out the contents of /tmp/FC3T2 to another directory, apply the new initrd.img and then mkisofs the whole directory back to iso again.......
gee....no time to try out anything yet....hope to have some time next week to clear this thing up.....
snyberg
17th May 2004, 12:28 AM
Is there a way to make this modified boot floppy without having access to a linux system? I am new to linux and I have a SATA HDD with the SiI3512 controller and I need the patch so the Fedora (1.92) installation recognizes it.
triplehead
19th May 2004, 07:53 PM
Originally posted by twgray
Yes, I have a shuttle with a 200GB Maxtor SATA hard drive. I currently have Gentoo64 on it, but would like to try Fedora. No luck so far. I guess I could install on an ide drive, recompile kernel with the siI3512 patches, and then copy it to the SATA...but by the time I've done all that, I may as well stay with Gentoo.
I tried to install core 2 to shuttle 85G4 and install halted when installing sata and usb drivers.
I found out that if i turned off usb support in BIOS install worked ok (i have usb mouse so had to do install on text mode). After 1 boot i turned usb support on and kudzu configured everything OK :D.
ewdi
19th May 2004, 07:57 PM
try disable ports you dont use, i disable Serial Ports, Pararel Port on my shuttle and it runs fine even all USB is on
triplehead
19th May 2004, 08:04 PM
Originally posted by tux
try disable ports you dont use, i disable Serial Ports, Pararel Port on my shuttle and it runs fine even all USB is on
all unused ports are disabled. i have even sata and raid support disabled and still fedora "see" them ???
ewdi
19th May 2004, 08:06 PM
that's odd, it shouldnt get through into bios read.
triplehead
19th May 2004, 08:33 PM
i know it's odd. 64 vesion installer did not detect same hardware as 32 version. For example, with my matrox parhelia installer told "no videocard, assuming headless" ;) , did not detect my Nokia 446PRo monitor (is on the list) and so on. Anyway, i'm up and running so i'm happy (now) :D.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.