PDA

View Full Version : The worst bill you’ve never heard of


Omega Blue
2006-06-08, 01:32 AM CDT
From the blog iPac (http://ipaction.org/blog/2006/06/worst-bill-youve-never-heard-of.html)


This will be a busy week in the House -- Congress goes into summer recess Friday, but not before considering the Section 115 Reform Act of 2006 (SIRA). Never heard of SIRA? That’s the way Big Copyright and their lackey’s want it, and it's bad news for you.

Simply put, SIRA fundamentally redefines copyright and fair use in the digital world. It would require all incidental copies of music to be licensed separately from the originating copy. Even copies of songs that are cached in your computer's memory or buffered over a network would need yet another license. Once again, Big Copyright is looking for a way to double-dip into your wallet, extracting payment for the same content at multiple levels.

Today, so-called "incidental" copies don't need to be licensed; they're made in the process of doing *other* things, like listening to your MP3 library or plugging into a Net radio station. If you paid for the MP3 and the radio station is up-to-date with its bookkeeping, nobody should have to pay again, right? Not if SIRA becomes law. Out of the blue, copyright holders would have created an entire new market to charge for -- and sue over. Good for them. Bad for us.

Don't let Big Copyright legalize double dipping. Fight SIRA today.

[Emphasis mine]

Sick. This is totally disgusting. Beyond pale. And they wonder why people cheer pirates on.

sailor
2006-06-08, 08:15 AM CDT
I can't beleive something like this would even pass...would be impossible to police...and will make us all pirates...arrrrrr!

Invader02
2006-06-08, 10:29 AM CDT
Actually, when some people on Digg tried calling their local reps on this, they said that they were going to reword this because temporary copies on ram is just ridiculous.

Here's the link to the actual act: Section 115 Reform Act (http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat051606.html)